SEC Issues FAQs About Share Class Selection Disclosure Initiative

If an adviser reduced their fee due to the receipt of 12b-1 fees, the SEC might not ask for any disgorgement; for instance, the SEC says, if an adviser regularly charges an annual management fee of 1.25% of assets but lowered that to 1% in light of the 12b-1 fees, the SEC says it is unlikely to ask for any disgorgement.

The Division of Enforcement of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued FAQs regarding its Share Class Selection Disclosure Initiative (SCSD) that it introduced in February, allowing investment advisers to self-report that they failed to disclose conflicts of interest associated with the receipt of 12b-1 fees by the adviser or an affiliated broker/dealer.

The SEC says that the settlement terms will apply only to the announcement and those advisers that meet the definition of a self-reporting adviser. Additionally, the settlement terms only apply to 12b-1 fees, not amounts tied to higher-cost share classes. There is no minimum threshold of assets for self-reporting, the SEC says.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Furthermore, the SEC says that its settlement terms will be standardized and not vary based on the severity and scope of the conduct. Investment advisers must report failures to disclose conflicts of interest to the Division of Enforcement, not to another SEC department, such as the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE). Should the OCIE have examined an investment firm for such failures, the firm can still self-report their failure to the Division of Enforcement.

If the Division contacted a firm on or after February 12, 2018, when the SEC announced its SCSD initiative, they are still eligible to participate in the program. If the Division contacted  a firm prior to that date, the firm should contact the SEC enforcement attorney working on the investigation to ask whether they are eligible for the SCSD program.

The program applies to investment advisers recommending share classes to clients for any type of account, including brokerage accounts, the SEC says. The SCSD program applies to instances when an adviser fails to disclose that they made an investment decisions in light of the receipt of 12b-1 fees or selected the more expensive 12b-1 fee share class when a lower-cost share class was available for the same fund. It applies to any type of fund sold, including money market funds.

The SEC says that advisers should know that a lower-cost share class is available to clients when their investments meet the applicable investment minimum or if the fund prospectus says it will waive the investment minimum for a lower-cost share class. If the fund prospectus contains such language, it is the adviser’s duty to contact the fund to inquire if it will waive the investment minimum, the SEC says. Additionally, if the adviser purchased a lower-cost share class for other clients, it is their responsibility to do so for all clients.

The deadline for self-reporting failures to disclose conflicts of interest regarding receipt of 12b-1 fees is June 12, 2018. By that date, advisers need to give the SEC their name and contact information and within 10 business days from their notification, the adviser must complete a SCSD questionnaire. Should an adviser want an extension of time to submit the questionnaire, they need to contact the SEC at least two business days before the June 12, 2018 by emailing the Commission as SCSDInitiative@sec.gov.

Any adviser who participates in the program must disgorge any 121b-1 fees they received, either directly or indirectly, back to their clients. The SEC is also giving self-reporting advisers the opportunity to explain, in a document of no more than 20 pages in 14-point font, double-spaced, what led to the disclosure failures, and whether they do not plan to disgorge all 12b-1 fees. The SEC staff will then communicate with the adviser about the appropriateness of their disgorgement.

If an adviser reduced their fee due to the receipt of 12b-1 fees, the SEC might not ask for any disgorgement; for instance, if an adviser regularly charges an annual management fee of 1.25% of assets but lowered that to 1% in light of the 12b-1 fees, the SEC says it is unlikely to ask for any disgorgement. Additionally, if the adviser takes the 12b-1 fee money and applies it to their own annual management fee to lower it below 1%, the SEC may lower the disgorgement.

Within 60 days of the SEC’s determination of disgorgement, advisers are required to inform the SEC how they plan to perform the distribution. Once the Commission reviews the calculation, advisers then have 90 days to distribute the funds. If an adviser believes they will have difficulty issuing the disgorgement, they should tell the SEC in the questionnaire and be prepared to provide financial information to support this claim. Any settlement made with the SEC will require advisers to agree that they willfully violated the Advisers Act, meaning that they knew what they were doing.

Advisers who are unsure whether they should participate in the SCSD program should consult with counsel. They may also contact the SEC at SCSDInitiative@sec.gov.

Leveraging the Popularity of TDFs to Provide Retirement Income

In a Q&A with BlackRock Managing Director Anne Ackerley, PLANADVISER hears about emerging opportunities to deliver retirement income solutions to DC plan participants, including through TDFs.  

PLANADVISER: Why do you believe that target-date funds (TDFs) should incorporate retirement income components?

Anne Ackerley: I’d start by saying that we need to be thinking about retirement income solutions, in part, because future retirees will face a very different environment. BlackRock research finds that current retirees aren’t spending down their retirement savings very fast. A substantial portion of retirees today have 80% or more of their savings nearly 20 years into retirement. This can largely be attributed to the fact that retirees have benefited from additional sources of retirement income, like Social Security and strong equity market returns.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

We believe the environment for future retirees will be different. The option to not spend down retirement assets will likely be off the table, so we need to help people understand how to spend in retirement.

Both plan participants and plan sponsors agree on this. Our annual DC Pulse survey found that 93% of participants are looking for guidance on how to spend their assets and 90% of plan sponsors feel responsible to help. That’s where target-date funds (TDFs) can provide a solution. Target-date funds have functioned as great products to help people save. Why not use this successful, existing product set to help people spend down their assets? We think this makes a lot of sense.

PA: Is this how you define “auto retirement”?

AA:  As we talk about it, “auto retirement” is the new frontier of auto features. Think about what has been successful in helping people save—plan design features like auto-enrollment and auto-escalation, paired with “set it and forget it” investment vehicles like the target-date fund as a qualified default investment alternative (QDIA). In other words, what’s worked has been a combination of tools and products that leverage what behavioral finance has proven to be true. People tend to be subject to inertia, so let’s make that work to their benefit, during accumulation and decumulation.

Auto retire applies these same principles to the spending phase. There will be a range of solutions. But we believe this new term calls for a combination of products, tools and technology to help participants translate a lump sum into a consistent stream of retirement income.

PA: How can plan sponsors make TDFs part of the “auto retire” framework?

AA: There are three things that plan sponsors can do to make a target-date fund part of an auto retire framework. First, when evaluating a target-date fund, they should look for one that is designed both for accumulation and decumulation of assets. Not all target-date funds are.

Second, plan sponsors need to make sure that their plans allow for periodic distributions. Very early, when 401(k) plans were first being started, plan sponsors set up their plans for a one-time lump sum. They need to go back to review their policies and work with their recordkeeper to make this adjustment.

Third, plan sponsors should think about a spending tool that can be integrated with the target-date fund. The BlackRock LifePath spending tool, for example, provides retirees with an estimate for how much they can spend in retirement each year. By putting in their age and retirement savings, a retiree immediately receives an estimate for current-year spending and its impact on their savings up until the age of 95. 

PA: How difficult is it for recordkeepers to support target-date funds that include a retirement income component?

AA:  Most plans today aren’t set up to allow for flexible distribution options. To enable that, plan sponsors can absolutely work with recordkeepers toward solutions that would allow retirees to automatically receive consistent income throughout retirement, including more frequent and periodic withdrawals.

PA: And what if the target-date fund includes a guaranteed income component in the form of annuities?

AA: The need for retirement income is going to result in a spectrum of products. The BlackRock LifePath funds, combined with a spending tool is one approach. Certainly, another could be to include some form of guaranteed income in the target-date fund. We currently offer the Lifetime Retirement Income product with annuities embedded. However, we are still in the early days of in-plan annuity use. Plan sponsors are only just starting to consider the full spectrum of options.

PA: What are the upsides and downsides of including an annuity in a TDF?

AA: The upside is that because participants have become very familiar with TDFs for the accumulation phase, we think that adjusting TDFs for retirees to help them spend their assets down is going to be a real advantage. As far as downsides are concerned, while our Lifetime Retirement Income product is straightforward, other TDFs with annuities embedded in them have been complex and require a fair amount of participant education.

PA: Are you finding that more plan sponsors are interested in retired workers remaining in the plan?

AA: Yes, particularly as more people are retiring every day. The benefit is that the employee continues to enjoy institutional pricing. And certainly the fiduciary rule, while it is going through some changes, has put a focus on what happens to assets in retirement.

More and more plan sponsors and participants are focusing on what happens in retirement. Our DC Pulse survey found that nine in 10 plan sponsors feel responsible for helping people with their retirement planning needs, and 93% of participants want more guidance. Across the industry, there is more focus on how to manage retirement income, and BlackRock believes target-date funds can offer a good in-plan solution.

«