SEC Outlines 2014 Examination Priorities

The Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE), part of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), released its list of examination priorities for 2014.

The OCIE is tasked with administering the SEC’s National Examination Program (NEP). As part of the NEP, auditors in Washington, D.C., and in the commission’s 11 regional offices conduct reviews of SEC-registered entities, including broker/dealers, transfer agents, investment advisers, investment companies, securities exchanges, clearing agencies and self-regulatory organizations.

The list is divided into five sections that cover market-wide priorities and the NEP’s four program areas, which include the following: investment advisers and investment companies; broker/dealers; exchanges and self-regulatory organizations; and clearing and transfer agents.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

There are six market-wide priorities identified in the report:

Retirement Vehicles and Rollovers. The SEC staff will undertake several initiatives related to retirement vehicles and rollovers, including examining the sales practices of investment advisers targeting retirement-age workers to roll over their employer-sponsored 401(k) plan into higher-cost investments. Broker/dealers will also be examined for improper marketing practices and such things as product suitability, churning (excessive trading in a client account meant to generate extra commissions), and use of misleading professional designations.

Fraud Detection and Prevention. The U.S. capital markets are built on trust, says the OCIE, and such events as scams, theft, unfair advantage and other fraudulent conduct erode that trust and adversely affect investors and the efficient functioning of markets. For that reason, the NEP will continue to utilize and enhance its quantitative and qualitative tools and techniques to identify market participants engaged in fraudulent behavior.

Corporate Governance, Conflicts of Interest, and Enterprise Risk Management. The NEP will continue to meet with senior management boards of entities registered with the SEC, including their affiliates when appropriate, to discuss how each firm actively identifies and mitigates conflicts of interest and other legal, compliance, financial and operational risks.

Technology. The capital markets are experiencing a decades-long revolution in technology, says the OCIE, and the increasing complexity, interconnectivity and speed fostered by technology continue to challenge market participants and regulators. The NEP will continue to examine governance and supervision of information technology systems, operational capability, market access, information security and preparedness to respond to sudden malfunctions and outages.

Dual Registrants. The convergence among broker/dealers and investment advisers continues to be a significant risk for investors, argues the OCIE. Auditors will examine whether representatives of dual registrants may influence whether a customer establishes a brokerage or investment advisory account, which may in turn create a risk that customers are placed in inappropriate accounts.

New Laws and Regulation. SEC staff will review general solicitation practices and verification of accredited investor status under newly adopted Rule 506(c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The staff will also be conducting reviews to assess compliance with recently adopted rules by municipal advisers. Similarly, in the event that rules are put in place regarding security-based swaps dealers and other registered entities created or impacted by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the SEC expects to allocate resources to conduct reviews of those registrants.

For the investment adviser and investment company examination program, the SEC plans to examine such areas as safety of assets, conflictions of interest inherent in certain investment adviser business models, and marketing practices.

Other priorities in the investment adviser/company space include examining SEC-registered advisers that have not yet been subject to any examination, wrap fee programs, quantitative trading models, presence exams, payments for distribution in guise, and fixed-income investment companies. Money market funds and alternative investment companies are also slated for closer examination, along with securities lending arrangements.

For broker/dealers, the SEC plans to examine inappropriate sales practices and fraud risks, as well as general firm supervision levels and securities trading practices. Also of importance for the 2014 NEP are anti-money laundering programs.

Another area of regulatory concern for broker/dealers is the suitability of variable annuity buybacks, following reports that insurance companies are offering to repurchase variable annuity products with less favorable terms.

Looking to self-regulatory organizations (SROs) and market oversight, the SEC plans to continue regular reviews of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, and the national securities exchanges for both equity and options markets.

Specific priorities in this area include targeted examinations of perceived control weaknesses at the national exchanges. The staff will continue its review of order types by focusing on the options exchanges in 2014.

In addition, the examination staff plans to coordinate with the Division of Trading and Markets to conduct pre-launch reviews of new exchange applications to determine whether each has the capacity to carry out its responsibilities as an SRO by enforcing members’ compliance with federal law and the exchange’s own rules.

Finally, the SEC also announced priorities for its clearance and settlement exam program.

First, examiners will focus on the implementation of annual exams for clearing agents, as mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act. That law requires the SEC to annually audit the clearing agents for which it serves as the primary supervisory agency. These include the Depository Trust Company, the National Securities Clearing Corporation, the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation and the Options Clearing Corporation.

Areas for review will be determined through a risk-based approach that incorporates new rules and standards.

In examining transfer agents, SEC staff will focus on three core activities: the timely turnaround of items and transfers; accurate recordkeeping and associated retention; and the safeguarding of funds and securities.

Other areas of focus will involve transfer agents that service micro-cap securities and private offerings, policies and procedures adopted by transfer agents for handling and transferring certain damaged certificates, and agents serving as third-party administrators (TPAs) for parties other than the issuer of a Section 12 security (such as a retirement plan).

The complete list of 2014 examination priorities is available here.

Plan Sponsor Activity Changed Directions

Defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors were less active in certain areas in 2013 than in 2012, according to Callan’s 2014 DC Trends Survey.

The survey found slightly fewer plan sponsors reviewed their investment policy statements, conducted investment structure evaluations or made manager replacements in 2013 than in 2012. In 2013, 60.4% of DC plan sponsors updated their investment policy statement—down from 63.3% in 2012. The percentage of plan sponsors that conducted an investment structure evaluation to determine gaps or overlaps in the investment offerings was 61.6%, compared with 68.5% in 2012.

Lori Lucas, leader of Callan’s Defined Contribution Practice, tells PLANADVISER, “If you look at 2012, it was a really active year in a lot of these categories because plan sponsors were getting a lot of information about fees acting on that. There is still activity in 2013, but it is leveling off. A lot of the work has been done.” Lucas adds that it is not necessary to perform investment structure evaluations every single year, but plan sponsors should review their investment policy statements every year.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Thirty-one percent of plan sponsors replaced funds or fund managers for performance-related reasons in 2013, compared with 41% in 2012. “When the market is doing well, we won’t see as much manager replacement,” Lucas explains.

According to the survey report, 2013 was the first year in the survey more plan sponsors decreased the number of funds in their DC plan investment lineup (17.5%) than increased them (9.5%). Lucas says, “Plan sponsors have been giving lip service to a streamlined lineup for years, but there was always an attractive fund out there to improve diversification—for example, Treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS)—but fewer plan sponsors are looking for such alternatives, and many have already added them.”

While focused less on investment offerings in 2013, more plan sponsors offer automatic plan features and are doing so in a robust way. Is this part of the refocus on participant outcomes? What else does this say about plan sponsor thinking? “A very encouraging sign we saw in the survey was the amount of focus on savings,” Lucas says. “So [plan sponsors are] not only getting people into the plan via auto-enrollment, they are adding auto escalation." She points out that 87% of plans with auto-enrollment now have auto-escalation. In addition, fewer plan sponsors offer auto-escalation as an opt-in feature, not an automatic feature for which participants have to opt out. “Plan sponsors are saying, ‘not only do we want employees in the plan, but we want them saving at adequate percent,’” Lucas says.

“There’s certainly a lot of evidence that when plan sponsors are evaluating features in their plan, they are aware of the impact on participant behavior, and asking how adding certain feature impacts participant behavior,” Lucas concludes. “The focus used to be about participating, now it’s more about outcomes.”

Callan fielded its 2014 DC Trends Survey in the fall of 2013, with responses from more than 107 DC plan sponsors. The survey report is only available to Callan clients.

«