New WIPN Research Compares ‘Advocates’ and ‘Mentors’

Mentors are like gurus—they are critical sources of information and inspiration—but the group says a true workplace ‘advocate’ can do a lot more to help people from underrepresented groups succeed in the financial services industry.


The financial services employment equity advocacy group known as WIPN has published its latest white paper, “The Story of Us: 2021 Evolution of Women in the Retirement Industry,” developed in collaboration with T. Rowe Price and OneDigital Retirement + Wealth.

The publication comes about two months after WIPN’s rebranding, first announced by PLANADVISER Magazine, from the “Women in Pensions Network” to “WE Inspire. Promote. Network.”

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The update in vision and mission detailed by WIPN’s leadership with the rebrand clearly rings through in the new research, which dissects the experiences of women—positive and negative—in the financial services space and provides a blueprint for those with power in this industry to address the gender and racial employment gaps that persist.

According to the analysis, the well-documented struggle experienced by professional women trying to find a better work-life balance is prevalent in the retirement planning and financial services industries. WIPN’s analysis shows women in the retirement plan industry experience the same challenges of time, personal workloads and dissatisfaction with the division of labor with their partners as do women in other industries. For context, the survey included some 800 women who are employed in the financial services space.

One in three women places work-life balance as a top factor that makes them feel successful at work—but it’s an area with some of the lowest overall satisfaction in the survey. Fortunately, WIPN finds, women are becoming more inclined to take time out of their schedules to recharge and engage in activities that foster well-being.

Speaking with PLANADVISER about the new report, Jennifer Norr, WIPN’s president and a marketing and strategy executive for CUNA Mutual Retirement Solutions, says one eye-opening finding is that just shy of half of the women in the survey report being the primary wage earner in their family—yet a strong majority of those surveyed also report being more responsible than their spouse for family-related household tasks and caregiving.

“This is just a very telling set of statistics that shows how important caregiving and managing the household is for our respondents,” Norr says. “Fortunately, we do see that 39% often take time for activities to support their well-being, and 85% do this at least sometimes. While time available may be scarce, many women are still finding opportunities for important self-care.”

The survey report says the experience of the coronavirus pandemic has proven that providing remote working options and more schedule flexibility can support caregiving women and help them to excel in their careers, while also allowing them to have more personal time.

“We’ve seen a move toward understanding that doing a good job and being committed is about the output, rather than the amount of time spent sitting in an office,” Norr says. “Stepping back, for women, satisfaction with career performance comes mostly from having a promising career path, more so than reaching the highest possible position. Unfortunately, only half agree that their career path looks promising, representing one of the largest gaps in this research between defining and achieving success.”

The survey shows two in five women have considered leaving their employer over the past year due to a lack of opportunities for advancement, and one in five continue to consider this often. Norr says these statistics should concern all employers.

“Further, one in three respondents don’t believe they have the education and training needed to advance, demonstrating there may be a need for employers to revisit training offerings to employees,” she says. “Employers also need to clearly communicate career paths for all levels to enable upward growth for those who seek it.”

Norr emphasized the importance of the communication aspect of career paths. Simply put, people will not assume they have opportunity to advance, especially over the mid- and long-term, if they are not told so and if they are not given clear guideposts along the journey from employment to promotion to leadership. This is true for everyone, including white men, but it is an especially pernicious problem when considering the outlook of women and people of color. When there is nobody who looks like them at the highest levels of leadership, it is natural for people to question what their own future at any employer looks like, WIPN says.

In terms of actionable takeaways from the research, Norr says there are plenty, but perhaps the most important is the central role of—and the differences between—what WIPN refers to as “mentorship” and “sponsorship.”

“Mentors are like your guru,” Norr says. “They are critical sources of information and inspiration, but they may not be in a position to provide you with direct support in your workplace. A true ‘sponsor’ or ‘advocate’ is someone you can identify and work with on the job, who can and will use their own influence to help someone else succeed in the financial services industry.”

According to the survey data, mentorships and sponsorships are both valuable, but women agree that a sponsor is more likely to help with advancement than a mentor (64% and 47%, respectively). The value of having a mentor or sponsor is recognized by many—as not having one is cited among the top five barriers to success—but only 17% of respondents feel they have a sponsor, though this increases to 42% of women with a mentor.

“The lack of mentors and sponsors is a particular concern among women of color,” Norr notes. “Almost a quarter cite the lack of a mentor/sponsor as a barrier to career growth. Women of color who do not have a mentor say that this is often due to an inability to find one who is a fit. Additionally, the data show that a significantly higher proportion of women of color feel excluded from formal and informal networks at work as compared to white women.”

The analysis goes on to show women of color not only express higher levels of dissatisfaction with their careers, but they also bear the dual burdens of having to “represent” their race and ethnicity and not being able to bring their full selves to work.

“Together, these factors can serve to inhibit career growth and a sense of belonging,” Norr warns. “These sentiments are not just home-spun, but rather stem from the cultures of many workplaces where employers’ actions often do not align to their stated values, even when formal diversity, equity and inclusion efforts exist.”

 

Excessive Fee Lawsuits Expected to Continue to Rain Down on Plans

Settlements have totaled more than $1 billion, making insurers think twice about new fiduciary insurance policies.


There have been approximately 200 “cookie-cutter” Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action lawsuits filed against retirement plans since 2015, including more than 90 cases filed in 2020 alone, says Jon Chambers, managing director at SageView Advisory Group, in a recent white paper, citing numbers from an industry insurer.

This includes an increase in lawsuits against smaller plans—i.e., those with less than $100 million in assets and fewer than 1,000 participants.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

With more “cookie-cutter” cases being filed, especially when the qualified default investment alternative (QDIA) is a “big ticket” target-date fund (TDF), Chambers writes, there is no sign of these suits slowing down.

All this has largely been due to what Chambers calls “the Schlichter Blitzkrieg,” referring to the barrage of lawsuits the Schlichter Bogard & Denton law firm filed against 401(k) plans and univesity 403(b) plans beginning in 2006. Several years later, in mid-2015, numerous other plaintiffs’ law firms began filing “copycat” style lawsuits against 401(k) plan fiduciaries and recordkeepers, generally following Schlichter’s “proof of concept” excessive fee claims, he writes.

“Over the past 15 years, ERISA fiduciary litigation in defined contribution [DC] plans has grown from a rare event … to a seemingly everyday occurrence,” Chambers writes.

‘Insurability Risk’

Amid the rush of litigation, fiduciary liability insurance underwriter Euclid Specialty says claims are so commonplace that fiduciary liability insurance could disappear.

“We have reached an inflection point in the war against [DC] plans because the risk has become virtually uninsurable,” Chambers says in his white paper, quoting a Euclid report. Thus, insurers to plan sponsors and plan fiduciaries are now beginning to talk about “insurability risk,” according to Euclid.

“Insurance companies have paid well over $1 billion in settlements, but this economic model cannot continue,” Euclid says.

For now, insurers are starting to hedge their exposure by considering reducing coverage and increasing retention, according to Euclid.

To protect themselves against ERISA litigation, which is “clearly significant for fiduciaries”—particularly when it comes to excessive fee cases—Chambers says, “thankfully, there are many strategies that plan sponsors can employ to mitigate ERISA litigation risk.”

Strong Governance Procedures

The wall of defense should start with “risk-mitigation strategies based on governance procedures,” Chambers says.

“Appoint a committee to oversee the plan’s fiduciary responsibilities,” he continues. “Define the duties of the committee in writing (via a committee charter) and have the committee review the duties and charter periodically. Have the committee develop, adopt and periodically review an investment policy statement (IPS), possibly with the assistance of an independent investment adviser. Hold periodic meetings (e.g., quarterly), distribute agendas and materials in advance, and prepare minutes that memorialize actions and decisions taken at meetings.”

Chambers goes on to say that it is also important to “consider involving qualified legal counsel in committee meetings/plan review process[es]” and to “ensure fiduciaries are properly appointed and appropriately trained.”

It is also smart for retirement plan committees to review fiduciary liability insurance coverage, ensure limits and deductibles are appropriate, and review communications from plan vendors to participants, he says.

Law firm Hanson Bridgett says plan sponsors can often avoid participant complaints through regular, clear communication. It adds that plan sponsors must be sure to “follow up on any participant complaints.”

Of course, sponsors must also have set procedures for monitoring service providers. Best practices, it says, include reviewing performance, including adherence to contractual performance standards; reviewing fees for reasonableness; and negotiating fees where appropriate.

All of this must be accompanied by a formal annual review process, and thorough plan document and operational compliance, the firm notes.

Plan sponsors should also be on the lookout for claims and appeals issues, as well as service provider issues, Hanson Bridgett says. Data security and fraud prevention are becoming more and more critical, for example.

Along the lines of data security, plan sponsors also need to have strict governance rules for committee meetings that are held remotely and should look for updates from the DOL on general fiduciary issues, the firm advises.

Legislative and Regulatory Priorities

Hanson Bridgett goes on to say that plan sponsors should also stay abreast of any legislative and regulatory changes. Priorities for this year include the possible passage of the so-called “SECURE Act 2.0,” and a potential new fiduciary rule from the Department of Labor (DOL), it notes. Both actions would have a big effect on the retirement plan industry and could also affect plan sponsors.

Environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing has also been a topic of hot discussion and changing guidance. Retirement plan experts say sponsors should continue to look for the latest guidance from the DOL if they are interested in using such investments.

Finally, the DOL is likely to issue continuing guidance on including private equity in employer-sponsored DC plans, the law firm says.

«