Here are the 17 finalists in the three categories: Individual, Team and Multioffice Team:
Individual Joe Connell, Retirement Plan Partners in Maple Grove, Minnesota Ellen R. Lander, Renaissance Benefit Advisors in Jamison, Pennsylvania Bruce Lanser, UBS Financial Services in Milwaukee, Wisconsin Thom Shumosic, MidAtlantic Retirement Planning Specialists in Wilmington, Delaware Dan Peluse, Wintrust Wealth Management in Chicago, Illinois
Team Ascende, Inc. in Houston, Texas Channel Financial in Golden Valley, Minnesota ClearPoint Financial in Bellevue, Washington Innovest Portfolio Solutions in Denver, Colorado The Kieckhefer Group in Brookfield, Wisconsin MHK Retirement Partners in Middleton, Wisconsin Spectrum Investment Advisors in Mequon, Wisconsin The Willhite Institutional Consulting Group of UBS in The Woodlands, Texas
Multioffice Team Retirement Benefits Group, headquartered in San Diego, California Cammack Retirement Group in New York, NY and Wellesley, Massachusetts Retirement & Benefit Partners, headquartered in Albany SageView Advisory Group, headquartered in Irvine, California
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
“We’re like a Good Housekeeping Seal
of approval for financial services,” Carlos Panksep, managing director of the Centre for
Fiduciary Excellence (CEFEX), tells PLANADVISER. With a growing number of
applicants, the designation functions as a sort of quality control for the
financial services industry.
The organization emulates the international standard ISO/IEC
17021, which outlines business, government and society standards, Panksep
explains. “In most industries, there are published standards for quality,” he
notes. The ISO provides a host of public standards, and CEFEX operates the same
way, issuing certifications that are based on set standards.
The fiduciary aspect of financial services is critical, and CEFEX
has a strong interest in firms that serve the retirement industry because of its
highly regulatory nature. CEFEX works with investment fiduciaries and industry
experts to improve risk management for institutional and retail investors, and
certification helps determine the trustworthiness of investment fiduciaries,
Panksep says.
In the last three months, CEFEX granted six certifications
to advisers, compared with two certifications for the same period a year ago.
In 2013, a total of 11 certifications were given. The designation has been
given out for eight years, and two substantial broker/dealers, LPL and NFP, have
both given weight to the organization. NFP entered a strategic
relationship with CEFEX to provide resources for its advisers to gain
certification.
Most of the adviser registrations—65 total, according to Panksep—are
for smaller firms that serve the small to midsize plan market, with plan assets
under $100 million, although a few manage plans with $100 million to $200 million
in assets. They are an elite group, he says, but they represent about $100
billion in invested assets, a combination of institutional and individual
assets.
Panksep describes these smaller advisers as “quite
transparent.” Some seek the designation in order to demonstrate that they are above-board.
“The program creates transparency and leads to accountability for the adviser,”
he explains.
Select Group
Not everyone who applies for the designation receives it. It
is rare, Panksep says, but some firms do not pass the audit. “Typically they
know what to expect because it’s an open standard,” he says. Anyone can prepare
adequately, but adherence to a fiduciary standard is especially critical. A former
investment adviser who was an outspoken 401(k) fiduciary advocate but who was
later found to have seriously breached his fiduciary responsibilities did not
make the cut.
At a recent informational meeting with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC), Panksep says the SEC acknowledged that CEFEX could
be a helpful mechanism to help determine the risk of an adviser. “They believe there
are methods and systems to help the SEC understand how to prioritize which
advisers to examine,” he says. “Having a private market drive assessment
complements the SEC’s
compliance program.”
Panksep points out that the industry is going through a lot
of discussion and debate about the right standards of practice. “Suitability
versus the fiduciary standard creates a fog,” Panskep notes. “This
certification allows an adviser to say, ‘Regardless of everything, here’s a fiduciary
standard that we adhere to. And we adhere to it sufficiently that we allow an
independent party to come in and audit our books.’ ”
Doug Prince, CEO of ProCourse Fiduciary Advisors, says the
firm sought the designation because it specializes in the retirement fiduciary
space, and the certification lends credibility to their operations. The process
was not cheap. Prince says the firm had to hire an outside accredited investment
fiduciary analyst (AIFA) to conduct the CEFEX audit, and gathering the
paperwork and data took two to three months.
Fiduciary Analysis
The process involves work and planning, according to Prince.
It is not immediate or quick, but it was worthwhile to help track the
consistency of products and services they deliver. Hearing from an independent appraiser
that the firm indeed delivers what it tells its clients it delivers was a
comfort. Prince says also that the designation helps his firm to differentiate
its service and model from that of other advisers, as well as from a
fiduciary perspective.
Panksep says advisers often explain to plan sponsor clients
that an adviser with the certification can help in the documentation process,
since plan sponsors are obligated to conduct due diligence on their service
providers and this brings the benefit of additional due diligence.
Prince says that in addition to a helpful value-add for plan
sponsor clients, in some rare cares, the client’s fiduciary liability provider
may even charge lower fees for working with an adviser whose process has been
vetted and analyzed, and is therefore less risky.
Going through the examination and audit led Prince’s firm to
make a few minor tweaks in language in a client’s investment policy statement,
in one case. The process helped to validate that the firm is acting soundly
because someone who has looked at other advisers can help improve other’s
practices. “It brought some things to light,” he says. Nothing was wrong, but
language could be added or reworded to improve it.
“Anytime you can get another adviser to look at everything
and give us comments on how we’re doing—how is that a bad thing?” Prince asks. “We’re
just trying to do the best we can for clients, and any advice we get is helpful.
We think it’s important to have someone come in and look at our clients to see
that we’re actually doing the things we say we’re doing. It puts our clients in
the best position possible.”