White Paper Gives Firms a Checklist Ahead of DOL Rule Change

A white paper outlines the rule changes, what it could mean for practice management and ways to avoid the excessive time and cost to comply.

FolioDynamix and Beacon Strategies LLC, an industry research group, have released a white paper to help advisory firms and advisers drill down to the actual impact of the upcoming fiduciary rule from the Department of Labor (DOL).

The content draws on study groups that discussed the rule change with broker/dealer, insurance, and RIA firms across the industry, facilitated by Beacon.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

The two firms aim to help advisers affected by the expansion of the “best interest standards” to individual retirement accounts (IRAs) and 401(k) rollovers. With confusion over both the dates involved and the actual provisions of the lengthy legislation, many firms are under the gun with some version of the legislation inevitable.  

“Understanding the DOL Fiduciary Rule Change and the Utilization of Fee-Based Products” explains the highlights of the legislation and covers ideas for best practices to avoid the expense and time that could potentially go into the new best interest contract exemption (BICE). The researchers believe firms should consider moving client accounts into the advisory space with its clearly disclosed fees and transparency into underlying investments.

The paper answers a range of questions, starting with a solid definition of the rule change and how it could impact firms, and recommends some best practices. Also covered are business basics that need to be considered in developing due diligence requirements for a fee-based advisory platform provider and why firms might consider fee-based product alternatives.

FolioDynamix is offering a complimentary “DOL Risk Exposure Assessment,” during which an FDX analyst will run through a firm’s retirement business and offer suggestions to allow firms to meet the regulations by the deadline.

“Philosophically, we are strong believers in fee transparency and believe it helps advisers build strong long-term practices,” says Steve Dunlap, president of FolioDynamix, “but recognize there are many circumstances in which commission business also makes sense. Our immediate concern is that this new rule will be both time-consuming and potentially difficult for firms to administer. Our goal is to help firms navigate these waters while minimizing the cost increases resulting from compliance to the rule.”

“Understanding the DOL Fiduciary Rule Change and the Utilization of Fee-Based Products” can be downloaded from FolioDynamix’s website.

TDFs Affect Retirement Plan Participant Trading Activity

Aon Hewitt says 2015 was the lightest trading year on record for DC plans.

According to the Aon Hewitt 401(k) Index, 2015 was the lightest trading year on record for participants in defined contribution (DC) plans.

Overall, 1.52% of balances were transferred in 2015—well below the historical average of 2.88%. There were 39 days of above-normal daily transfer activity in 2015. The number of above-normal days in 2015 (39) is in line with the average number of above-normal days over the past five years (35) and past 10 years (35), Aon Hewitt says.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Part of the light trading activity can be explained by the prevalence of target-date funds (TDFs), which are now the largest asset class in the 401(k) Index. As of year-end 2015, target-date funds represented 23.1% of total assets, slightly edging out Large U.S. Equity (22.7%).

When participants made trades, they tended to favor fixed income funds over equity instruments. The number of fixed income-oriented days was 139, compared to 109 for equity-oriented days. GIC/stable value funds received the most inflows (41%) while the majority of outflows came from TDFs (37%) and company stock (30%).

However, TDFs received the most contributions in 2015 (42% or $498 million).

After reflecting contributions, trades, fund changes, and market activity, participants ended the year with 65.4% in equities—a decrease from 66.4% of assets invested in equities at the end of 2014.

More information is here.

«