IMHO: Naughty or Nice?

A few years back—when my kids still believed in the reality of Santa Claus—we discovered an ingenious Web site that purported to offer a real-time assessment of their "naughty or nice" status.

Editor’s Note:  There’s so much going on in the world of retirement saving and investing that I never feel the need (or feel like I have the opportunity) to recycle old columns – but this one has a certain “evergreen” consistency of message that always seems appropriate – particularly at this time of year.

A few years back—when my kids still believed in the reality of Santa Claus—we discovered an ingenious Web site that purported to offer a real-time assessment of their “naughty or nice” status. 

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Now, as Christmas approached, it was not uncommon for us to caution our occasionally misbehaving brood that they had best be attentive to how those actions might be viewed by the big guy at the North Pole.   But nothing ever had the impact of that Web site – if not on their behaviors (they’re kids, after all), then certainly on the level of their concern about the consequences.   In fact, in one of his final years as a “believer,” my son (who, it must be acknowledged, had been PARTICULARLY naughty) was on the verge of tears, worried that he’d find nothing under the Christmas tree but the coal and bundle of switches he surely deserved. 

Naughty Behaviors?  

One might plausibly argue that many participants act as though some kind of benevolent elf will drop down their chimney with a bag full of cold cash from the North Pole.   They behave as though, somehow, their bad savings behaviors throughout the year(s) notwithstanding, they’ll be able to pull the wool over the eyes of a myopic, portly gentleman in a red snow suit.   Not that they actually believe in a retirement version of St. Nick, but that’s essentially how they behave, even though, like my son, a growing number evidence concern about the consequences of their “naughty” behaviors.   Also, like my son, they tend to worry about it too late to influence the outcome—and don’t change their behaviors in any meaningful way.     

Ultimately, the volume of presents under our Christmas tree never really had anything to do with our kids’ behavior, of course.   As parents, we nurtured their belief in Santa Claus as long as we thought we could (without subjecting them to the ridicule of their classmates), not because we expected it to modify their behavior (though we hoped, from time to time), but because, IMHO, kids should have a chance to believe, if only for a little while, in those kinds of possibilities. 

We all live in a world of possibilities, of course.   But as adults we realize—or should realize—that those possibilities are frequently bounded in by the reality of our behaviors.   This is a season of giving, of coming together, of sharing with others.   However, it is also a time of year when we should all be making a list and checking it twice—taking note, and making changes to what is naughty and nice about our savings behaviors. 

Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus—but he looks a lot like you, assisted by “helpers” like the employer match, your financial adviser, investment markets, and tax incentives.  

Happy Holidays!  

——————————————————————————–

The Naughty or Nice site is still online (at http://www.claus.com/naughtyornice/index.php.htm).  An improved site and much better internet connection speeds produce a lightning fast response – more’s the pity.  I used to like the sense that a computer was actually having to crank through the data!   

New Report Says FAs Reassessing Business Model

A new report suggests that more financial advisers (FAs) at the national broker/dealers (B/Ds) are reluctant to follow home office model portfolio recommendations. 

Instead, they have become more engaged in portfolio construction and more interested in discretionary account management, according to a report from Strategic Insight, an Asset International company. 

The SI report notes that “action breeds confidence,” and that the “partly passive nature of outsourcing investment management through home office models eliminates some of the FA’s psychological benefits of being ‘in control’ of a client’s investment portfolio.”  Additionally, the compensation to the FA associated with managing discretionary accounts can be slightly higher than for nondiscretionary accounts.  That said, “with increasing presence of ‘Reps as PMs’ (including, for example, the highest selling platform in the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney system lately), opportunities for fund wholesalers to influence such FA choices are expanding,” according to the report. 

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Path Towards Fiduciary Standards 

This trend toward discretionary account management, which is typical for many registered investment advisers (RIAs),  but less so among FAs at national B/Ds, may accelerate as the path towards “fiduciary” standards becomes clearer. The SI analysis indicates that with such a standard, some advisers may shift even more to “fee-based, vehicle-agnostic home office models,” ostensibly for better time management and for shifting responsibility for results away from themselves.  That said, the SI report acknowledges that other FAs might prefer moving forward with the customization benefits of a fee-based discretionary approach as a way to address fiduciary standards.  

SI notes that the role of mutual fund wholesalers remains very significant, citing the fact that, at Merrill Lynch, “85% of flows lately were in platforms where the FA makes the decision,” while just 15% were based on home office determination (according to a senior Merrill Lynch executive presenting at a recent SI conference).  

Additional Education

Of course, with the added responsibilities that come with discretion over a client’s portfolio, FAs need not only deeper product knowledge from wholesalers but also portfolio construction guidance, education and training, according to the analysis.  

As part of their response to what it characterized as the “bubbly” demand for bonds and bond funds today, SI notes that some B/Ds have launched programs and road shows to encourage advisers to make client recommendation beyond just “searching for yields higher than cash.” These programs emphasize FA need/obligation to focus on investors’ future portfolio underfunding risk, and thus the need for equity allocations.  SI says that that education has advocated bond fund credit exposure over interest rate exposure, and globally, emerging markets allocations over developed capital markets.

More information about the report is available at http://www.sionline.com/published/2009-whitepapers/main.asp

«