Federal Reserve Data Offers Sweeping View of DC Plans

Workplace defined contribution plans serve as the collection mechanism for retirement savings, and IRAs serve as the resting place.

“The release of the Federal Reserve’s 2016 Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) is a great opportunity to see how a strengthening economy, the continued maturation of the 401(k) system, and steady stock market returns have affected workers’ retirement wealth,” say researchers with the Center for Retirement Research (CRR) at Boston College.

According to CRR white paper “401(k)/IRA Holdings in 2016: An update from the SCF,” the big advantage of the survey is it provides information not only on 401(k) balances—much of which is available from financial services firms—but also on household holdings in individual retirement accounts (IRAs), which are largely rollovers from 401(k)s.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

“Essentially, 401(k)s serve as the collection mechanism for retirement saving, and IRAs serve as the resting place,” the report explains.

The good news in the updated Federal Reserve data is a slight increase in participation rates and greater use of target-date funds; the bad news is flat total contribution rates, persistently high fees and significant leakage.

“The SCF shows, for households approaching retirement, an increase in 401(k) plan balances from $111,000 in 2013 to $135,000 in 2016,” CRR researchers . “But only about half of households have 401(k)/IRA balances, and, as defined benefit [DB] plans phase out in the private sector, the rest will have no source of retirement income other than Social Security.”

The analysis concludes that 401(k) plans “could work much better and balances would be higher if all plans were fully automatic.” Particularly important are mechanisms such as automatic enrollment—for both existing and new employees—and automatic escalation in the default contribution rate. Additionally, it would be helpful if “default contribution rates were set at realistic levels,” i.e., much higher.

Crucial to note, CRR says, is that participation rates in plans without auto-enrollment actually declined between 2013 and 2016. “To the extent that plans without auto-enrollment constitute a larger share of total participants than is often reported, the decline in their participation rate would noticeably slow the pace of improvement,” the CRR concludes.

Also troubling, average employee contribution rates declined between 2015 and 2016.

“The decline can be attributed mainly to auto-enrollment, which increases participation rates but has a depressing effect on contributions,” CRR notes. “The reason is that default contribution levels are often set at 3% or lower, and [as] less than 40% of plans with auto-enrollment have auto-escalation in the default contribution, many of those who are enrolled at low contribution rates remain at those rates. Employer contributions bring the total average deferral rate to around 11%.”

The full brief, including dataset, is available for download here

SEC’s New Form ADV Expands Scrutiny on Registered Advisers

Additional information RIAs must now disclose on the Form ADV may help the SEC develop an automated system to single out firms for examination. 

Registered investment advisers (RIAs) will need to share a lot more than they’re used to with the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) now that updates to the Form ADV are in affect.

The changes require RIA firms to disclose additional information about their social media activity, separately managed accounts (SMAs), the overall client base, and assets under management, among other topics.  

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

G.J. King, president of consulting firm RIA in a Box, tells PLANADVISER that over time, this additional data may allow the SEC to more easily “scan the RIA space to pinpoint which firms may pose significant market risks or compliance issues, among other problems.” When it comes to social media usage, King says the SEC can also use its expanded information set to make sure RIAs are complying with marketing standards. 

“As it relates to RIAs, social media is like any other form of advertising in the SEC’s eyes,” King explains. “We can assume that over time, the SEC will have better capabilities to programmatically scan social media postings for particular keywords or problematic posts. They’re going to be scanning for phrases like ‘guarantee’ or ‘beat the market,’ anything making a promise or testimonial which may be prohibited as it relates to RIA advertising.”

Some of those can be false-positives, of course. But recent changes have made it easier for the SEC to find this data. According to RIA in a Box, firms must be very cautious about what type of social media information they choose to display on their websites. As a rule of thumb, any websites should only link to or mention such accounts belonging to the firm and in which the RIA controls the content.

According to an SEC release speaking about the new Form ADV and other topics, “staff may use this information to help prepare for examinations of investment advisers and compare information that advisers disseminate across different social media platforms, as well as to identify and monitor new platforms.” King adds that, “Being active on social media is not a prohibited activity by any means. We’re seeing more RIAs utilizing social media as part of their marketing campaigns every day. Just like with any form of advertising, you need to make sure you’re archiving your social media posts.”

NEXT: Separately managed accounts 

RIAs will need to start to disclose additional details about SMAs including types of assets held in each account and where they are held, as well as the use of derivatives and borrowing. The SEC release states, “for purposes of reporting on Form ADV, we consider advisory accounts other than those that are pooled investment vehicles (i.e., registered investment companies, business development companies and pooled investment vehicles that are not registered (including, but not limited to, private funds)) to be separately managed accounts.”

For all accounts, RIA firms will need to identify the number of clients in different categories—such as individuals or institutions—as well as the total AUM for each client type.

“RIAs are now going to have to provide more data about the types of securities they’re investing in for clients and also where those assets are held from a custody standpoint,” explains King. “This will help the SEC scan and prioritize firms for examination. It’s also going to help them conduct a higher level of market-risk analysis. For example, if a custodian is having financial trouble, the SEC will have more accurate data to zero in on where those challenges may be and how impactful this is to the overall financial system.”

David Solander, counsel with Goodwin Law Group, points out that the last recession of 2008-09 caused the SEC “to realize they didn’t really have the information they thought they needed to be better prepared for a financial disaster. The SEC computer systems are now built to process more data and allocate trends and identify risk areas.”

Certainly a net positive for market stability, reporting the additional data needed to enhance the SEC’s visibility can be burdensome for advisers. King says the recent changes may require firms to “organize data in a different manner and to think about investing in new reporting and portfolio management systems to make sure they’re able to capture this data.”

However, the scope of this reporting also depends on the size and complexity of the firm, and smaller ones may get some wiggle room. As Solandar explains, there is even a cut off: “For example, RIAs that manage less than a certain amount in assets in separately managed accounts may have a little less onerous disclosure.”

NEXT: Other changes to consider 

Firms working with outsourced chief compliance officers (CCOs) will need to disclose this operation as well as any entities paying the CCO for services.

In addition, larger firms will need to list the 25 largest branch offices based on number of employees. Beforehand, RIAs only needed to disclose the five biggest braches.

“These are the ways the SEC is hoping to fill in the blanks about the RIA space,” King concludes. “This is why the SEC wants substantially more information regarding advisers’ separately managed accounts and other topics. The SEC has fairly good data about mutual fund holdings. There’s also more reporting on private funds. But they don’t really have this much information on separately managed accounts.”

Given that such a large percentage of assets in the RIA space are managed via separately managed accounts, “there is a cap in the data system,” King says. “And closing that gap, may allow the SEC to achieve greater ‘big data’ capabilities in terms of monitoring the securities space in an ever-evolving digital world.”

RIAs who have made changes after October 1, 2017, won’t need to disclose additional information about AUM, SMAs, or wrap-fee programs until they file their annual Form ADVs in 2018. However, they will have to report other changes if they are made after this date, but before they file their annual Form ADVs.

The SECs Final Rule on Form ADV can be accessed at SEC.gov, and an FAQ on Form ADV is also available. 

«