Cost of Deferred Retirement Income Has Climbed

The estimated cost of purchasing future lifetime retirement income for workers in their 50s and 60s climbed during the first quarter of 2015, according to BlackRock’s CoRI Retirement Indexes.

The CoRI indexes suggest long-term interest rates have started to level out from prolonged historic lows—a benefit to retirees hoping to address longevity risk via deferred annuities. BlackRock says the start of 2015 is again demonstrating how important it is for pre-retirees to keep in mind that retirement investment strategies are often sensitive to interest rate changes.

The good news from the Q1 2015 index results is that fixed-income markets gave most pre-retirees a small assist in closing the gap between their current savings and the retirement income they want, BlackRock explains. The bad news is that the estimated cost of generating income in retirement still rose faster than the value of retirement investments.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

BlackRock reports the median nest egg for 55-year-old workers could generate only $16,252 per year starting at age 65—down from $18,422 at this time last year. The main reason for the drop year-over-year is lingering low interest rates, which have climbed some in 2015 on stronger economic data but continue to hover far below long-term averages. BlackRock finds the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note fell a “whopping 28.94%” in the 12 months ended March 31, despite the fact that many forecasters anticipated rates to start climbing towards normal during that period.

The Federal Reserve has opened the door to raising short-term rates later this year, but BlackRock warns it is still unclear how many rate increases the Fed will enact this year, or how substantial they will be. Even more challenging to address is speculation that interest rates have been depressed for so long that it remains unclear whether a small uptick in the shortest-term rates would do enough to penetrate the longer-term fixed income markets, which are depended on even more by pension funds and other long-term investors.

BlackRock says rates matter to individual pre-retirees as well, because they play a critical role in determining exactly how much deferred retirement income will cost via the annuitization pathway. Long-term interest rates are one of the primary drivers of annuity pricing, and are looked to as a key indicator of macroeconomic vigor (or weakness).

BlackRock concludes that, despite the possibility of bond portfolio volatility and losses in the near term, increased rates will likely make annuities more affordable. Looking back, BlackRock says when the 10-year Treasury yield rose almost 20% in the second half of 2013, the CoRI Index 2023 level fell by 5.17%, meaning every dollar in deferred annual retirement income cost about five cents less. 

Demographics Prompting Focus on Retirement Income

Changing workforce demographics are driving retirement plan policy and law, says Fred Reish, chair of the financial services ERISA team at Drinker, Biddle & Reath LLP.

Speaking to attendees at the 44th Annual Retirement & Benefits Management Seminar, hosted by the Darla Moore School of Business at the University of South Carolina and co-sponsored by PLANSPONSOR, Reish noted there is a focus on retirement income within the Department of Labor’s (DOL) regulatory agenda. For example, the new fiduciary investment adviser proposed rule from the DOL—he says the rulemaking is less about 401(k)s or other retirement plans and more about the 65-year-old who retires today and lives to 85. What are they going to do when not protected by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) bubble? Are they going to have any money left at age 85?

The Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) recently issued a report about a survey in which it found for those who died at age 85 or above, 20.6% had no non-housing assets and 12.2% had no assets. Among singles who died at or above age 85, 24.6% had no non-housing assets left and 16.7% had no assets left. Those who died at earlier ages were generally worse off financially.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

“Changing demographics are changing the focus on sustainability of retirement income,” Reish told seminar attendees.

The DOL is also working on a requirement that retirement benefits statements participants receive include a projection of how much monthly income their balance will purchase in retirement. Reish cited a September 2014 Towers Watson survey which found more than half of participants didn’t know how much they need to have a comfortable retirement or how much they can expect from their retirement plan.

He noted that some fear showing participants this information will discourage them, and they may give up. But, last year’s EBRI Retirement Confidence Survey (RCS) showed participants were not surprised by monthly income projections.

Reish said quarterly statements are the only ERISA mandated reporting that participants may actually read. The DOL is proposing to include a projection of the annuitized monthly value of current account balances for the participant and surviving spouse, and the same values projected forward to retirement—something Reish believes is a good idea to show. He said once the mandate is final, the retirement industry will step in with benchmarks (how much will participants need), gap analyses (how off-track are participants) and advice on deferrals. “While the government is the genesis of change, private companies will make sure it works,” Reish stated.

The DOL is also working on regulations to help plan fiduciaries with the selection of annuity providers because it wants to make sure plan sponsors are comfortable offering annuities to participants. According to Reish, the safe harbor the agency is working on is primarily focused on the plan sponsor determining whether the annuity provider is able to make good on promised future payments under annuity contracts.

Reish thinks retirement education will be the next big movement in the industry—not just retirement plan information or savings and investment education. The changing workforce demographics will lead the industry to focus on educating participants 50 and older about all retirement income options.

«