How Auto-Portability Can Address the Wealth Gap

Research shows workers who cash out their retirement plan savings could lose roughly 1.5 years of accumulated wages, but auto-portability seeks to make it easier to prevent this.

Due to the power of compound interest, seemingly small amounts that leak from tax-advantaged retirement accounts when people change jobs can cause major erosion to their nest eggs down the line, a study explains. The research seeks to examine what people do with their 401(k) balances when they leave an employer and looks at the demographics of people who roll in balances to their new employer.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Citing previous research, the study by Alight Solutions notes that four out of every 10 people cashed out their balances after termination within a 10-year period. Not surprising, Alight says, the group most likely to cash out were those with the smallest balances, such that 80% of people who had an account of less than $1,000 cashed out, while 62% of those with balances between $1,000 and $5,000 cashed out.

The study suggests that both age and income have an impact on roll-in behavior. Workers in their 20s are least likely to roll in money from a previous account to a new account, followed closely by those who are in their 60s. Workers in their 30s are the most likely to roll in balances. People with higher compensation were also much more likely to roll in balances. New hires making at least $80,000 were more than eight times more likely to roll in balances than new hires making less than $40,000.

There is a severe leakage problem when workers move to a new employer, particularly with small accounts, meaning they must completely start over when it comes to saving for retirement, says Spencer Williams, Retirement Clearinghouse founder, president and CEO. Using technology to save both time and resources, he notes that automatic portability seeks to help limit leakage by automatically moving retirement accounts from the old employer to the new employer.

For its version of auto-portability to work, the Retirement Clearinghouse follows guidance released by the Department of Labor that specifies the conditions that must exist for the company to be allowed to transfer a worker’s account, Williams says. Both employers must be signed up for the service, the worker must be notified no less than twice that a transfer will happen, and the worker must have the option to opt out at any time.

To illustrate the impact cash-outs can have on the future retirement accounts of those who chose not to roll their assets over to a new account, Alight made projections using a new-to-the-workforce employee.

For purposes of these projections, the firm assumed that a 22-year-old starts saving in a retirement plan at 3% and escalates that amount 1% each year, up to 6%. The plan matches 50 cents-per-dollar on the employee’s contributions. Interest was assumed to be 5% per year. The individual’s initial compensation was $25,000 and grew by 2% each year. Retirement was assumed to be at age 67.

If there is no leakage, the employee’s projected balance at age 67 could be almost $500,000, in this particular example. The study found that taking one early cash-out can having damaging consequences, while taking three small post-termination cash-outs during one’s working years can lead to a nearly 20% reduction in the projected age-67 balance, depending on when the cash-outs take place.

In the example, one cash-out at age 24 of $3,000 leads to a $23,000 (5%) loss in the projected age-67 balance, which equates to roughly half a year of additional working wages. An additional cash-out at age 26 of $4,500 leads to a $56,000 (12%) overall loss in the projected age balance, or roughly one year of additional working wages. A third cash-out at age 28 of $5,000 leads to a $91,000 (19%) overall loss—roughly 1.5 years of additional working wages.

Alight warns that this striking example may, in fact, paint an overly optimistic picture of the situation. First, the projections assume a modest, net-of-fees return of 5% per year. Alight’s 2020 Universe Benchmarks shows that, for the decade of the 2010s, the median return earned by participants was almost twice that. Higher returns would make the impact of the early cash-outs even more profound. Assuming a worker earned 7% each year, Alight found that the impact of the three cash-outs would be almost $200,000, or a 25% reduction in projected retirement income.

Additionally, the amounts shown for the cash-outs do not reflect the impact of any taxes or withholdings. Withdrawals of 401(k) balances are usually treated as income and can incur substantial federal and state taxes, Alight says. In most cases, people who take money out pre-retirement are also charged a 10% penalty tax.

“So, if anything, the amounts shown for the cash-outs in the projection can be viewed as an overstatement of the money the person would receive,” Alight’s analysis explains.

Leakage is most prominently seen among Black, Hispanic, women and other minority workers, says Renée Wilder Guerin, Retirement Clearinghouse public policy executive vice president. Research shows there is an “enormous benefit” to keeping peoples’ money in the tax-advantaged retirement planning system, and auto-portability helps to keep the playing field level and improve the wealth gap by ensuring there is no cash-out leakage when someone is moving to a new employer.

“In today’s world of growing interest in diversity, equity and inclusion, auto-portability is a solution that is measurable—you can measure the impact of someone keeping their retirement account going,” Wilder Guerin says.

She notes that, through Retirement Clearinghouse’s efforts to address the inequities and economic challenges many minority workers face, auto-portability has secured endorsements from two civil rights organizations—the National Urban League and the NAACP.

Only One-Third of Households Report Having a Written Financial Plan

Research found written plans are associated with higher savings and bigger emergency funds.

The tangible benefits for employees of a having a written financial plan are clear, according to a Hearts & Wallets survey of 5,794 U.S. households.

The research found that Americans who have a financial plan enjoy increased savings, better asset allocation, more confidence in financial decisionmaking and more balanced portfolios, along with other financial wellness metrics. When it comes to asset allocation, those with a plan avoid the extremes in cash and equity allocations observed among households that don’t have a plan.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

According to the research, “The Power of Planning: Proven Benefits That Transform Consumer Financial Outcomes,” four of five U.S. households (82%) say they think about working toward long-term financial goals, with half (54%) having a plan. However, only one-third of households with plans report having written plans.

Americans with a written plan save more across all income levels. More than half (52%) of households with written plans save 10% of income or more versus 36% of households with unwritten plans. For households that think about goals but don’t have a plan, the most common behavior is to save modestly at 1% to 5% of income (29%) and about one in four do not save at all.

Written plans may be especially important for low- and moderate-income levels, the research suggests. One-third of households with less than $48,000 in annual income with a written plan save 10% or more of income, compared with about one in 10 households in that income range without written plans.

“Educating low- and moderate-income households on the benefits of written plans may help them to build a stronger financial future,” says Beth Krettecos, Hearts & Wallets subject matter expert.

Schwab’s 2018 Modern Wealth Index found that having a written financial plan can lead to better “daily money behaviors,” and this goes for those near the bottom of the income scale. According to the Charles Schwab analysis, among those without a written plan, nearly half (45%) say this is because they don’t think they have enough money to merit a formal plan. Next-most common, 20% say crafting a formal plan simply never occurred to them, and another 20% say they wouldn’t know how to go about getting a plan.

“The idea that financial planning and wealth management are just for millionaires is one of the biggest misconceptions among Americans, and one of the most damaging,” warned Joe Vietri, senior vice president and head of Schwab’s retail branch network, at the time of the study. “Whether people think they don’t have enough money, believe it would be too expensive or just find the whole concept too complicated, the longer they wait, the harder it is to achieve long-term success.”

Households with any kind of financial plan experience improved emotional financial wellness, such as feeling on track for retirement and being more confident in financial decisionmaking, the Hearts & Wallets survey found. Plans, and particularly written plans, are also associated with bigger emergency funds.

A previous Wells Fargo/Gallop Investor and Retirement Optimism Index found 43% of investors with a written plan are highly confident they are headed toward a comfortable retirement, whereas 23% of those without a written plan feel highly confident.

“Although we are experiencing rising account values and optimism, it’s important not to underestimate the importance of a thoughtful strategy and  a written plan not only for saving and investing, but also for drawing down funds in retirement given the complexities of longevity, taxes and when to begin Social Security benefits,” said Joe Ready, head of Wells Fargo Institutional Retirement and Trust.

The Hearts & Wallets report can be ordered from here.

«