Regulations, Work Force Changes Challenge Plan Sponsors

Retirement plan sponsors surveyed repeatedly expressed frustration with regulatory complexity and concern about greater worker mobility.

Plan sponsors surveyed by Buck Consultants identified the creation of 401(k) plans as having the most significant effect on employers who sponsor defined contribution plans.

Survey respondents identified the Pension Protection Act of 2006 as having the most impact over the last 40 years on defined benefit plan sponsors. The two runners up were volatility exposed by increased accounting transparency, and demographic changes in the workforce—such as fewer long-term workers.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Apart from the statutory changes to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), respondents to the survey—fielded for the last in a series of articles from Buck commemorating the 40th anniversary of ERISA—noted other changes in the 40 years since ERISA was enacted that directly and indirectly impact employee retirement benefits. These include such trends as increased employee turnover and the decline of “career” employees, as well as a graying work force that might not be able to retire because they have not saved enough.

Several plan sponsors expressed particular concern with increased employee turnover and the increasing prevalence of defined contribution retirement plans. In particular, they worried that workers are far too tempted to cash out retirement savings each time they leave an employer. Some also lamented the decline of defined benefit retirement plans and expressed concern that some participants still are not prepared to successfully navigate defined contribution plans—particularly in terms of investment selection and monitoring.

The top challenges faced by plan sponsors in the survey were administrative complexity, designing effective employee communications, and balancing the needs of large, diverse work forces. Frustration with regulatory complexity was expressed repeatedly by survey participants. One participant even suggested that tax preferences for employee benefits be eliminated—observing that without the tax preferences, there wouldn’t be “so many rules to get in the way!”

However, asked what would happen if the favorable tax rules for employer provided retirement and health coverage were repealed, survey respondents overall predicted that employers would drop both types of benefits, and, for those employers that retained plans, that fewer employees would participate. Some expressed concern that employers would drop plans without a corresponding increase in cash wages—leading to decreased retirement savings.

Asked what one thing they would change about retirement plans or regulations, respondents cited nondiscrimination requirements and better education, advice and modeling tools that would enable participants to understand the long-term implications of savings decisions.

Some plan sponsors wished for a reinvigorated defined benefit pension system, and some wished for an end to lump-sum distributions from retirement plans, as well as retirement and health coverage offerings designed and sponsored by the federal government—as opposed to our employer-based system that exists today.

Also on the wish list for improvements to defined contribution plans was the ability to buy chunks of an annuity as an investment choice.

Plan sponsors expressed concern about retirement readiness and its impact on managing a workforce, with one survey respondent saying, “Folks who do not save enough and cannot afford to retire [make it] hard to manage employee attrition. ERISA needs to be better in getting people to transition into retirement.”

Buck Consultants fielded the survey in August and September of 2014, among approximately 40 plan sponsors.

Old-School Practices May Drag Down Valuation

If you are thinking about practice valuation, consider some steps to get it into the best shape possible for the highest valuation.

First, says Paul Saganey, founder and president of Integrated Financial Partners, bring your database into the 21st century. “You want to organize that back office and get the database in the best possible shape,” Saganey tells PLANADVISER.

The first step is dumping those file cabinets full of paper. “Get away from paper as much as possible,” he says. “Nobody wants file cabinets full of paper.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Jay Wells, an adviser at Foresight Wealth Management, agrees, noting that most advisers who are thinking about transition are old school. “They love their filing cabinets,” he tells PLANADVISER.

But when Wells bought a practice that had all client records on paper, he immediately thought, “We have to hire some part-timer to scan this stuff and put it into the system, and throw the paper away.”

Wells points out that the cabinets hold a great deal of vital information, but says his practice is almost completely paperless, which he maintains increases the value of a practice.

Cutting down on paper and last-century equipment is part of the general spruce-up that advisers who are selling need to pay attention to. “They need to do a better job or presenting their data to their prospective buyers,” says Danny Sarch, president of Leitner Sarch Consultants.

One possibility Sarch suggests: An up-to-date list of clients, without names, shown in a presentable and organized way, that shows household size, number of years as a client, frequency of conversations and meetings, and the age of members of the household can distill all the key facts about the client base.

The database should be ready to go, Saganey says, an example of how the practice operates efficiently and effectively. “The more organized you are, the more revenue can increase from a more efficient back office,” he says.

Wells says that not being completely familiar with the practice’s clientele can hurt valuation. “Clean up the books,” he suggests. Some advisers don’t know all their clients, and they don’t know the numbers. “Some books are full of old clients that are more maintenance than profitability,” he says, which is a definite negative. Someone may have 300 clients, but only 50 are actually generating profit. And one client with $3 million in assets will take the same amount of time as one with $200,000.

Client Relationships

Make sure there is more substance to the practice than just the personal relationship, Wells advises. Some clients are more loyal to the relationship with the adviser than to the practice, and may be difficult to bring over in a transition. Sometimes it’s the adviser’s methodology and practice management that clients like, which is easier to replicate than a personal relationship.

Advisers should make sure they are versed in current technology, such as making efficient use of the database, according to Saganey. “They can absorb and contain so much more client information than ever before,” he says. “They’re truly an extension of the practice, but all too often they’re just used for the most basic functions.” He suggests using the database to keep segmented data on clients, from assets, to activities they like to do, to what their accounts look like.

“Use the database to get your marketing message out there,” Saganey says. “They have the ability to continually keep your name in front of your clients.” This function can be adjusted to “set it and forget it,” sending information automatically so that it performs the functions of a marketing systems to keep the adviser’s name in front of clients and prospects.

Saganey is a proponent of establishing client financial websites that aggregate their account information and provide document vaulting. Clients can access these sites 24/7, and they are proving to be one of the most effective communication tools, he says. The information is not just the assets managed by Saganey’s firm, but all their financial information: wills, trusts, insurance policies.

He explains that just as most people have a junk drawer somewhere in their homes, so do they often treat their financial lives. Uploading all the information and having it organized in case of a catastrophe or emergency increases the adviser’s value to the client and increases the value of the practice, because of the level of detail and information on clients’ financial websites.

Keep an Open Mind

The websites are very popular with clients, Saganey says. One caution: he warns that financial planners and advisers should try not to bring their own biases to the table when it comes to new technology or practices. “Just because I wouldn’t like it, doesn’t mean my clients wouldn’t like it,” he says. The personal websites can also bring some efficiency to the practice by minimizing the number of face-to-face meetings.

“Many advisers believe that being busy is being productive, and that simply is not true,” Wells says. Inefficient use of time is one of the most common practices Wells says can keep advisers from expanding or improving. Noting that time is an adviser’s most valuable resource, Wells says it should be used to maintain and build client relationships.

“An adviser only generates revenue by meeting with clients,” Wells says. “All other activities should be outsourced as much as possible.”

But just because they can do the work themselves does not mean they shouldn’t hire an assistant, Wells says.

Saganey quotes a high-performing planner who said, “If you don’t have staff, you are staff.” He suggests that advisers get help in the areas they are less competent in, and try to maximize their abilities in the areas of their business in which they are highly competent.

Overall, Saganey says, he looks at the level of organization a practice displays, whether the financial planning is up to date and if the clients are well cared for. “The more organized you are and your practice is, the higher your valuation will be,” he says. And he emphasizes the need for older advisers to keep up with the current technology and tools that younger people use. “The more turnkey your operation is, the better valuation you’ll get,” he says. “And the new school of younger advisers is incredibly tech savvy.”

«