After some 50 years of operations, the American Society of
Pension Professionals and Actuaries (ASPPA) has taken a new name, the
American Retirement Association (ARA), to reflect an expanding mission.
The ARA and its affiliated organizations represent more than
20,000 members across nearly all retirement industry professions—including
actuaries, consultants and administrators, insurance professionals, financial
advisers, accountants, attorneys and human resource (HR) managers.
The ARA’s roots extend back to the 1966 founding of the American
Society of Pension Actuaries. Today its members work with retirement plans of
all types, from traditional defined benefit (DB) pension plans to 401(k)s, 403(b)s
and 457 plans.
Brian Graff, executive director and CEO of the ARA, says membership has seen strong growth in recent years.
“This new name and structure allows us to better acknowledge and represent the
distinct perspectives of an expanding array of retirement plan professionals in
a dynamic and complex legislative and regulatory environment,” he says.
Based in the Washington, D.C., area, the ARA is a nonprofit organization with the goals of educating retirement benefit
professionals and “creating a framework of policy that gives every working
American the ability to have a comfortable retirement.”
The organization is composed of four
distinct retirement industry associations. These are the American Society of
Pension Professionals and Actuaries (ASPPA); the ASPPA College of Pension
Actuaries (ACOPA); the National Association of Plan Advisors (NAPA); and the
National Tax-deferred Savings Association (NTSA).
As part of the launch of the American Retirement
Association, a new logo and brand identity have also been developed for each of
its member associations.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
Boosting Plan Participation Without Auto-Enrollment
Automatic
enrollment is touted as a must-use feature for defined contribution retirement plan sponsors to increase plan participation, but many plan sponsors
cannot use this feature.
Specifically, most 403(b) plans that are not governed by the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) cannot use automatic
enrollment. John Kevin, vice president for the K-12 market at VALIC in Houston,
says most K-12 public school systems’ hands are tied by state anti-garnishment
laws which say amounts may not be deducted from employee paychecks without
written permission. Ellie Lowder, of TSA Consulting and Training Services in
Tucson, Arizona, which provides consulting for PlanMember Securities Corp., the
National Tax-Deferred Savings Association (NTSA) and other clients in the
industry, points out that for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt entities that want to
maintain the non-ERISA status of their 403(b)s, ERISA says they must have
limited involvement with the plan, and auto-enrollment would run afoul of the
law.
These plan sponsors want to boost employee participation and
engagement with their plans to ensure retirement readiness of employees and
help employees retire when they want. Lowder adds that helping employees retire
when they want is a budget-saver, as salaries and certain benefit costs are
lower for new employees than for long-term employees.
Kevin tells PLANADVISER another reason it is important,
especially for public schools, to boost employee participation in their defined contribution (DC) plans—403(b)s and 457s—is the increasing uncertainty of public pension
benefits. Many public pensions have funding issues, and many have made changes,
such as lengthening service requirements and increasing employee contribution
requirements. “Boosting DC plan participation adds diversity to retirement
savings options for employees as well as employers,” he says. “If we increase
participation in DC plans, it will hedge against more uncertainty in the future
for pensions, and for Social Security.”
Lowder says the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has provided
another reason for increased interest in boosting participation in non-ERISA
403(b) plans. She tells PLANADVISER that in late 2013, she began to
receive reports that the IRS started a new focus in audits, specifically in the
K-12 public education market. The IRS had begun to check on effective
opportunity for employees to enroll and make changes, as required by 403(b)
universal availability rules. “They told me when I followed up with them that
they were selecting for audit plans with participation rates as low as 15% to
20%,” she says.
So, what is a non-ERISA 403(b) plan sponsor to do to boost
participation and engagement without auto-enrollment as a tool?
Lowder says, during a webcast following her conversation
with the IRS, an agent told attendees that to comply with effective
opportunity, 403(b) plan sponsors must employ year–round strategies; it is not
enough to provide an annual notice of the opportunity to participate in the
plan. According to the agent, efforts must include year-round education about
the plan and financial issues. Lowder says this should include newsletters,
workshops and face-to-face meetings with benefits staff and advisers to
encourage enrollment.
Kevin adds that employers should not forget tried and true
methods DC plans have been using to boost participation—various communications
with participants and one-on-one counseling with advisers. “Communication tactics
are already well-developed,” he says, suggesting plan sponsors use a
multi-tiered approach, using do-it-yourself calculators, websites, call centers
and meetings, to reach a broader set of the employee population. “Ultimately,
it’s just a matter of getting participants more engaged and helping them
recognize the value of these plans in the face of future uncertainty.”
According to Lowder, plan vendors or providers will need to
bring to the attention of employers the need to increase 403(b) plan participation
and how to do so because employers do not have expertise in these plans. For
example, she notes that K-12 plan sponsors are school business officials;
they’re not experts in supplemental retirement plans.
Most K-12 plans, and many other 403(b)s have multiple
vendors or providers. Lowder says vendors are approaching plan sponsors about
providing more financial education opportunities for employees, but the plan
sponsors are questioning how other vendors will react if the plan sponsor
allows one to provide financial literacy workshops. She says this can be done,
without slighting vendors, if the presenting vendor brings to every workshop a
list of all vendors and their contact information and is not allowed to tout
itself during workshops. “I’ve seen this, and participation increased for all
providers in the plan following the workshops,” she notes.
Lowder adds that the message to employees is important, and
education should include workshops about the basics—such as what is an annuity
and what is a mutual fund—as well as an offer to help employees calculate the
gap between what they will need in retirement and what other benefits and
Social Security will provide them. “The call to action is to identify this
gap,” she says.