Women in More Urgent Need of Savings Help than Men

An analysis found a 26% gap in the shortfall between men’s and women's retirement savings.

A new study from Financial Finesse suggests that, in general, working women will need to save more—and at a much faster pace—than men to satisfy the average cost of expenditures in retirement.

The analysis found a 26% gap in the shortfall between men’s and women’s retirement savings. The analysis included a look at median incomes, deferral rates, retirement savings, life expectancies, and projected health care costs to determine how much the median 45-year-old man and woman would need to save in order to replace 70% of their income in retirement.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Further analysis revealed a “purchasing power” gap of 95% between men and women in terms of extra dollars needed to fund retirement expenses. Greg Ward, director of Financial Finesse’s Think Tank, who is based in Hickory, North Carolina, explains that, using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Expenditure Survey, Financial Finesse found the average expenditure for someone age 65 or older is around $45,000 today, so 20 years from now, assuming a 3% rate of inflation, it will be about $78,000 per year.

“Looking at how much the median 45-year-old man and woman have saved and are contributing, right now neither men nor women are on track to have enough to meet the average expenditure, but the shortfall for women is substantially greater,” he tells PLANADVISER. The analysis found the median 45-year-old man is projected to have a shortfall of $267,233 in savings to meet average retirement expenses at age 65, compared to a $522,262 shortfall for the median 45-year-old woman.

NEXT: How plan sponsors and advisers can help

“We have seen a lot of studies that indicate employees in general, and especially women, trust employers for education and advice, in some cases more so than the financial services industry as a whole,” Ward notes. “So employers are uniquely positioned to help women identify the need to save aggressively and the obstacles they face.”

Financial Finesse also found what it calls a “confidence gap.” For example, men are more likely than women to express confidence that their investments are allocated properly (48% of men vs. 34% of women). Similarly, men showed more confidence in their decision making related to general investment knowledge (84% of men vs. 67% of women), having an emergency fund (63% vs. 48%), and paying off debt (67% vs. 50%).

Ward says this shows there is a great opportunity for retirement plan sponsors and advisers to provide financial planning, as well as retirement planning to employees, and especially to women. “Women have a tendency to take advantage of [financial wellness] benefits when available,” he says. “It helps to close the retirement savings gap as well as the confidence gap. Money management is so important; sponsors and advisers should make sure employees have this foundation under control.”

According to Ward, women tend to learn well through collaboration, so plan sponsors and advisers should consider a workshop environment that allows hands on work with colleagues. He adds that providers have some great information in writing and online, but if it is not personalized and not written in such a way that relates to women, it won’t be as helpful. Women want less jargon, Ward notes.

Women like face-to-face advice as well, so Ward suggests advisers understand and speak the language women can relate to. “If you’re talking about accumulating wealth and rates of return, that doesn’t resonate with women as much as men. Talk about quality of life, independence, and time with family,” he says.

A summary of Financial Finesse's findings can be viewed here.

Safe Harbor Plan Launch Deadline Closes In

A safe harbor plan requires an initial plan year that is at least three full months, making October 1 the effective deadline for creating a new plan in 2015. 

There probably aren’t many better proxies for measuring small businesses’ interest in creating retirement plans than the sales figures for a company like ShareBuilder 401k.

The firm specializes in helping small businesses and mid-sized employers launch safe harbor and tradition design 401(k) plans. Stuart Robertson, president of ShareBuilder 401k, tells PLANADVISER sales are up a strong 23% to 24% year over year.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

“In our corner of the business, there is a lot of energy and strength in the marketplace,” Robertson says. “Some of that is our own sales success, but some of that is also the confidence that small businesses have right now in the U.S. economy.”

The past couple weeks have seen a market reassessment, but the weakness and uncertainty ruffling the markets is pegged mainly to Europe and Asia, not necessarily the economy here in the states.

“It’s the fundamentals that are driving interest in safe harbor plans and other plan designs,” Robertson says. A survey his firm completed in 2014 found that 86% of small-business owners who currently offer a plan are willing to spend more on their plan in return for increased support for the plan and for their employees. This includes paying for access to investment advisers (37%) and employee guidance tools and materials (35%).

The survey further suggests that if an adviser can stress the importance of paying reasonable fees and show how he can strengthen the plan and participants’ results, his firm may be able to win more small-business accounts.

“So far, we have not seen a change in the buying behavior based on increasing market volatility,” Robertson adds.

NEXT: Discounts available on safe harbor startup 

Robertson says ShareBuilder 401k is, like last year, offering small business owners $100 in savings if they establish a new safe harbor 401(k) plan before September 15.

The big benefit of safe harbor plans is their simplicity, he notes. Traditional 401(k) plans are subject to annual nondiscrimination testing to ensure that the average deferral rates and employer match contributions of the highly compensated employees do not exceed the average deferral rates of the nonhighly compensated employees by more than (i) 125% or (ii) two percentage points and two times such deferral rates. If the average deferral rates of the highly compensated employees exceed the average deferral rates of the nonhighly compensated employees by more than the legally permitted percentage, then potentially costly remedial steps must be taken.

Safe harbor 401(k)s are not subject to the Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP) and Actual Contribution Percentage (ACP) tests. Robertson points out that this provision allows highly compensated employees to max out their annual contributions to defined contribution retirement plans, sans testing problems. In exchange for more relaxed testing requirements, plans of this type must make certain minimum employer contributions and meet other requirements related to vesting, withdrawal restrictions, and participant communications (see “Matching Contributions Under Safe Harbor Plans”).

A helpful publication from Legacy Retirement Solutions’ President Steve Warner warns safe harbor 401(k) plans “must be adopted before the beginning of the plan year and maintained throughout a full 12-month plan year.”

“In the context of the first year that the plan or 401(k) feature is established, a plan is permitted to have a no shorter than three month plan year for purposes of the safe harbor 401(k) feature,” he explains. “Therefore, it is possible to establish a calendar year, safe harbor 401(k) plan as late as October 1st and still obtain the exemption from the ADP and ACP tests in relation to the remainder of the year.”

More information on the ShareBuilder 401k promotion is here.

«