The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) announced safe harbor retirement plans can be amended mid-year for changes relating to language about same-gender marriages.
If a safe harbor 401(k) or 401(m) plan needs to be updated
to comply with the U.S. Supreme Court’s Windsor decision,
which recognizes the marriage of same-gender couples under federal law, they
have an exception to the typical beginning-of-the-plan-year time frame for plan
amendments, according to the IRS.
Following the Windsor decision, plans need
to be amended if, for example, they define the term “spouse” as only a person
of the opposite sex (see “Not
All Retirement Plans Must Be Amended for Windsor”). A plan must also be
amended if the plan sponsor chooses to reflect the outcome of Windsor for
periods prior to the date Windsor was decided.
According to the IRS, required amendments must generally be
adopted by the later of December 31, 2014, or the applicable date under the
IRS’ general amendment guidance for qualified retirement plans, Revenue
Procedure 2007-44.
More
information from the IRS about mid-year amendments in relation same-gender
couples can be found here.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
Between 2011 and 2013, T. Rowe Price Group instituted
permanent bans against 1,300 American Airlines employees and sent warning
letters to another 800 employees about their potentially disruptive trading
patterns (see “Airline
Employees Banned from Trading Certain Funds”). The 1,300 employees are
prohibited from trading among T. Rowe Price funds, but still permitted to trade
among the other investment choices in their plans. A recent article by CNN
Money notes certain participants of some American Airlines’ 401(k) plans have
been banned from trading into certain funds, some for a finite period of
time and some for life.
The issue with the airlines’ employees centers around
newsletters that offer trading recommendations to employees. The EZ Tracker LLC
newsletter has been noted, as well as 401k Maximizer, which caters to employees
of not only American Airlines, but also Southwest, U.S. Airways and Delta.
Though the instances reported in the media have been about airlines’ employees, fund companies may institute these restrictions when employees of any industry frequently trade within their employer-sponsored retirement plans. Vanguard has given warnings to employees of Southwest Airlines. When asked if there was a regulation requiring them to halt such trading, Linda S. Wolohan, a Vanguard spokesperson, told PLANADVISER, “It’s not primarily a
regulatory situation. The prospectus for our funds gives Vanguard the authority
to take action if there’s frequent trading or purchases by any type of
investor, whether or not through a retirement plan, that we determine to be
harmful to a fund.”
Wolohan explains that Vanguard took such steps only after
exhausting other avenues to resolve the issue, such as repeatedly asking the
newsletters to stop making recommendations on Vanguard funds.
“The issue is large, unexpected transactions that can also
be the result of frequent trading,” says Wolohan, who is based in Valley Forge,
Pennsylvania. “These transactions can be disruptive to all shareholders in a
fund because they can affect the fund manager’s ability to fully invest cash or
to liquidate securities in a timely or cost-effective manner.”
She
explains that it is the unexpected nature of these transactions that is the
crux of the issue, adding, “If we know well in advance of a scheduled plan
‘event’ that will trigger the need for massive transactions—for example, a
401(k) plan is substituting one or more funds in its investment lineup with
other options, thus necessitating the need to sell the assets of participants
in the old funds and buy the new ones—we can plan to execute those trades at
the lowest possible transaction costs.”
However, says Wolohan, if the fund manager does not know
about these large transactions in advance, they cannot plan accordingly. “All
transactions in 401(k) plans are aggregated at the end of the day, and we are
obligated to sell at the previous day’s net-asset value,” she says. “In that
time, prices may have changed, which can hurt the fund’s value and harm all
shareholders.”
Wolohan adds, “Some of these types of newsletters believe
they can best serve their subscribers by recommending that they move from an
existing fund to the ‘hot’ fund of the moment. This can lead to frequent
trading. But frequent trading can create transaction costs—and possibly tax
consequences for non-retirement investors—that the rest of the shareholders in
the fund must absorb.”
Wolohan explains that Vanguard is an advocate of a long-term
investing approach, with research showing some of the most significant factors
that derail an investment strategy are behavioral. These factors include the
failure to rebalance, the allure of market-timing, and the temptation to chase
performance. The latter two, she notes, are the issues for employees who are
frequently trading.
“We try to safeguard our long-term shareholders from
subsidizing frequent transaction activity by others,” she says. “We do this
through our frequent trading policy, which restricts fund investors from making
rapid out-and-back round trips. It prohibits shareholders who redeem or
exchange any amount out of a Vanguard mutual fund from purchasing or
exchanging, by telephone or online, back into the same fund for 60 calendar
days. The rule is designed to ensure that investors think long term, while
still allowing them to effectively manage their assets.”
As to whether there is anything that plan sponsors need to
be doing to make these investment restrictions clearer to participants, Wolohan
notes that this is not a widespread issue in the 401(k) space, so most plan
sponsors probably do not need to worry about it.
“But,
if there is a problem, fund companies will work with the sponsor, who will
likely use plan communications to educate the participants on the issue,” she
says.