Perspective: Cash Balance Plans: The Brighter Side of the Coin

Today’s retirement plan market reflects two sides of a coin; one silver, the other gold. 

On the silver side, the contribution limit for 401(k) plans in 2011 is $16,500 plus another $5,500 for plan participants who are age 50 and older.  The silver is a little tarnished, though, because only 7 percent of participants ever come within $500 of the limit, according to a Financial Engines survey.  Frankly, most participants never contribute anywhere near the limit.

On the gold side of the coin are business owners and professionals who may be able to accumulate as much as $49,000 annually by implementing advanced defined contribution plan designs and significantly increasing employer contributions.  Yet, the gold does not shine brightly enough for the most affluent who still struggle to accumulate enough assets to continue their comfortable lifestyles when they vacate the “C” suite. 

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Business owners and professionals who earn high six-figure and seven-figure incomes need help from a financial adviser in finding new ways to set aside greater portions of their paychecks.  One of those ways is to establish a cash balance defined benefit plan to complement a defined contribution retirement plan with an advanced design.  The combination may result in as much as $250,000 being earmarked annually for retirement benefits to fund the plan’s liabilities as a whole.

Cash balance plans are becoming increasingly popular. As of 2007, the most recent year for which data is available, there were 4,797 active cash balance plans, according to the Internal Revenue Service.  That represents a 359 percent increase from 2001, the IRS reports.  So why the dramatic increase?

Owners of successful businesses and professional practices are learning that cash balance plans can help them enhance their retirement benefits while potentially reducing their taxable income. If you’re a baseball fan (or a doctor, dentist or lawyer), that’s akin to winning a double header.

Cash balance plans can also help “balance” the risk inherent in equity-oriented retirement investments.  Unlike a defined contribution plan, the plan participant does not bear the investment risk within a cash balance plan.

As previously mentioned, employer-funded contributions made to the cash balance plan may generally be deducted on the firm’s federal- and, where applicable, state-income tax return.  And the special rules for cash balance plans allow their benefits to be more heavily weighted in favor of business owners and key employees than they can through defined contribution plans, provided certain requirements are met.

But keep in mind that a cash balance plan is not a perfect fit for every business.  These defined benefit plans must be funded by an employer annually, which can mean a significant financial commitment.  Not every business owner has the financial wherewithal or the desire to accept such an obligation.

Nevertheless, there are plenty of firms with advanced plan designs that are ready, willing and able to squeeze more out of their retirement plans.  You can locate many of these firms by tapping public data bases such as freeerisa.com, larkspur.com and many others.  The search should focus on those commercial or professional entities that already have retirement plans with advanced designs.

You will find that the principals of many of these firms want and need to set aside significant amounts of coinage for retirement.  For them, the two-sided coin of retirement planning shines brighter on both sides.

E. Thomas Foster Jr., Esq., is The Hartford’s national spokesperson for qualified retirement plans. Foster works directly with broker/dealer firms and advisers to help them build their qualified retirement plan business and educate them about industry issues.

This information is written in connection with the promotion or marketing of the matter(s) addressed in this material. This information cannot be used or relied upon for the purpose of avoiding IRS penalties. This material is not intended to provide tax, accounting or legal advice. As with all matters of a tax or legal nature, you should consult your own tax or legal counsel for advice.

Cash balance plan designs are complex and require the assistance of a financial professional and third-party administrator.  Additionally, cash balance plans require annual employer funding and they may not be suitable for some businesses.  The Hartford’s materials highlight cash balance plan advantages, but certain restrictions and limitations will apply based on plan design and retirement plan rules, among other factors, which may affect tax deductions, funding levels and distributions of plan benefits. 

Many tax planning strategies emphasize the deferral of current income taxes, on the basis that your federal income tax rate may be lower at retirement.  Please keep in mind that federal income tax rates are unpredictable and may be higher when you take a distribution than at the time of deferral.  Other factors, including state tax rates and your income, may also affect your overall tax rate upon distribution.  Please consult with your tax advisor for individual tax planning strategy and advice.  The Hartford does not predict or in any way guarantee favorable tax results.
 

“Client-Facing Professionals” Most Trusted in Industry

Client-facing professionals (brokers, advisers, agents, and bankers) are the most trusted source of information in the financial services industry, according to a recent survey.  

The 2nd annual “Trust in U.S. Financial Services” survey from Edelman Public Relations found trust levels are suffering throughout the industry.Forty-six percent of individual investors participating in the survey trusted financial services companies less in 2010 than 2009. Of that substantial percentage, 57% said it is because financial services companies are “acting in a greedy manner” and 18% said the “industry itself has made the problems worse.” For the survey, “Individual Investors” are those with household incomes of at least $50,000 and that have at least $10,000 of investable assets.

“The way people perceive companies has changed significantly since the pre-crisis era, and the reputations of financial services companies in the U.S. have been some of the hardest hit,” said Matthew J. Harrington, CEO, Edelman U.S. “The decline in trust in these institutions – even as the financial markets were recovering – underscores the long road back they must travel to re-earn the lost trust.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

The survey also found that half of the respondents acknowledged needing help managing their money more effectively, but six in 10 are uncertain of the value that large financial services firms can provide in managing their money.

Investors said “honest communication” (91%) and “open and transparent business practices” (84%) are most important to them when considering the merits of a financial services company. Traditional marketing tactics – “fair and competitive prices” (75%), “available customer service” (74%) and “website with easy financial transactions” (62%) – ranked lower, as did “consistent product delivery” (75%).

Moving away from “big, bad banks” 

Edelman found less than half (49%) of respondents trust financial institutions in general. Community or regional banks scored highest in the survey (67%), with mutual fund companies coming in second at 55%. Life insurance companies (42%) and property/casualty insurers (37%) ranked in the middle of the pack, and investment banks (35%) and private equity firms (32%) were least trusted.

One silver lining large financial firms may want to pay attention to - "Entry-Level Affluents" – a sub-set of the survey with an annual income of more than $150,000 and investments of more than $100,000. They have significantly higher trust in both large, national banks (52%) and brokerage firms (49%), than the overall Individual Investor survey population (45% percent and 43% respectively).

Respondents viewed client-facing professionals – brokers, advisers, agents and bankers – as the most credible sources of information (37%) from financial services firms, with portfolio managers seen as the second most credible (15%).    

Fifty-six percent of those surveyed believe that financial institutions need to be regulated more, even after the passage in July 2010 of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Additionally, two out of three respondents believe Dodd-Frank doesn't address some problems, and 65% believe government agencies, financial services companies and Congress must work together to address the problems facing the financial services industry.

«