SEC Adopts Final Liquidity Rules

Retirement plan sponsors clients may see some effects from the new rules.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted to adopt changes to modernize and enhance the reporting and disclosure of information by registered investment companies and to enhance liquidity risk management by open-end funds, including mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

Previously, John Hollyer, global head of Vanguard’s Investment Risk Management Group in Malvern, Pennsylvania, told PLANADVISER mutual funds have a very strong track record of managing risk and liquidity. “So you could argue that plan sponsors have been well-served by regulations so far, and … sponsors could benefit from knowing firms have higher standards for risk management,” he said.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

However, “If mutual funds were less fully invested in the market because of liquidity requirements, that could be a detriment, particularly to long-term investors,” Hollyer added. And, there could be the potential for increased costs passed to investors by mutual funds.

In order to provide funds with an additional tool to mitigate potential dilution and to manage fund liquidity, the SEC proposed amendments to rule 22c–1 under the Investment Company Act to permit funds—except money market funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs)—to use ‘‘swing pricing,’’ a process of adjusting the net asset value of a fund’s shares to pass on to purchasing or redeeming shareholders more of the costs associated with their trading activity. Those amendments were adopted by the SEC as well.

Hollyer explained that this means when cash flows in or out rise above a certain threshold, the mutual fund could choose to adjust the cost of the fund that day to account for the number of investors who bought or sold on that day. Long-term investors, such as retirement plan participants, would benefit from this because they would not bear the cost of frequent traders.

NEXT: The changes

According to the SEC, the reporting modernization rules will enhance data reporting for mutual funds, ETFs and other registered investment companies. With these rules, registered funds will be required to file a new monthly portfolio reporting form (Form N-PORT) and a new annual reporting form (Form N-CEN) that will require census-type information. 

The information will be reported in a structured data format, which will allow the Commission and the public to better analyze the information. The rules also will require enhanced and standardized disclosures in financial statements and will add new disclosures in fund registration statements relating to a fund’s securities lending activities.

The liquidity risk management rules are designed to promote effective liquidity risk management for mutual funds and ETFs, reducing the risk that funds will not be able to meet shareholder redemptions and mitigating potential dilution of the interests of fund shareholders. They will require mutual funds and ETFs to establish liquidity risk management programs that address multiple elements, including classification of the liquidity of fund portfolio investments and a highly liquid investment minimum. The rules also strengthen the 15% limit on illiquid investments and will require enhanced disclosure regarding fund liquidity and redemption practices.

The new rules and forms will be published on the SEC’s website and in the Federal Register.

For Advisers, Psychology Matters As Much as Economics

Investment decisions can be greatly influenced by childhood experiences, especially those associated with a perceived sense of loss. 

After spending the last 25 years serving as a wealth adviser to clients ranging from individuals to institutions, Chris White, a chartered financial analyst, believes that all sorts of investment decisions are influenced by much more than just market trends and numbers; he’s “seen firsthand that investing is as much an emotional experience as it is an analytical one.”

White explores the concept in his new book, “Working with the Emotional Investor: Financial Psychology for Wealth Managers.” In the book, he explains how peoples’ investment decisions and risk tolerance can be influenced by their upbringing and past experiences—especially traumatic ones that occur early in life.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

“Childhood experiences obviously tend to have a large effect on the makeup of individuals,” White tells PLANADVISER. “Up until around the time a child turns eight, the world revolves around that child, he or she is the center of the parents’ attention, and can do no wrong. Then, something happens. Something breaks that, and this child realizes they are no longer the center of the universe. It happens to all of us.”

White says these breaking points can be marked by events such as divorce in the family or the loss of a loved one—or it can be something more nebulous. By drawing from his own experiences and the latest research in the field of neuro science, he says he “learned that these painful memories can be triggered during high-risk situations like the prospect of saving for retirement. Along with the memories of those scenarios also come the strategies used to address or avoid them.”

White says that during these high-stake moments, investors often tap into what he calls their “emotional templates.” He breaks these personality types into three categories: fixer, survivor and protector.

NEXT: Personality Traits and Investing 

White describes the “fixer” as a leader who is not afraid to take risks. A “protector” is someone who is less prone to risk and more defensive. Meanwhile, a “survivor” is someone who tends to stay the course of a defined strategy despite immediate challenges.

“Each has his strengths and weaknesses, and each is expected to react to high-risk situations such as market volatility differently,” White explains. “Therefore, it’s crucial for advisers to know which ‘emotional templates’ their clients reflect.“

This knowledge, he argues, would help consultants anticipate how clients may react during times of market turmoil, while also understanding what approach they should take to guide these individuals through turbulence.

“When the market sells off, the fixer would take risks to get even or to get ahead of everyone else,” says White. “They have to win.”

White explains a different outlook for protectors.

“They’re so anxious that they can’t stand the pain of loss and may flee the markets,” White adds. “The survivor is sort of the opposite. The survivor hangs in there maybe longer than they should. They’re committed to their causes and are almost risk neutral.”

White adds that “Survivors can stay invested in stocks longer than they should be, so the adviser needs to gently tie back that indifference and say, ‘We need to make a change and resolve this issue.’”

The author explains that working with a “fixer” is a different story.

“The fixer will actively ignore what the adviser is saying,” White warns. “It doesn’t do any good to oppose a fixer. You have to work with them to address problems, not against them.”

NEXT: Client fear is widespread and influential 

According to a recent poll by Eaton Vance, more than eight in 10 advisers cited fear as the primary motivation for their clients. A 2016 Employee Financial Wellness Survey by PricewaterhouseCooper found that more than half of respondents reported stress about finance, and 45% said it increased in the last 12 months.

White argues it’s crucial to take a gentler approach with some clients; it is also important to note that people tend to find the threat of loss more significant than the anticipation of equal gain.

“Researchers have discovered that losing money in the stock market, say $1,000, was twice as painful as the amount of pleasure gained from winning twice that amount,” says White. “The ratio can be 2 to 1, but some researchers suggest it could be even higher than that.”

In his book, White dives into the idea that people react to the markets based on their childhood experiences. Of course, this isn’t always something the average person would want to spend time talking about with a financial adviser.

White describes learning about a client as a process that involves plenty of active listening. He reflected on one instance when he was talking to a client on the way to lunch, and ended up learning about how his family lost almost everything following a house fire when he was a child. This helped White analyze the client’s “sense of loss” and “emotional template.”

Carla Dearing, CEO of online financial-planning service Sum 180, often works with people who have lost a lot. She stresses that it’s important to help these people understand that they’re not doing as bad as they think.

She says she has found people to be somewhat relieved when they find out financial burdens such as their credit card debt is not as bad as the national average, for example. “The first thing a lot of people say to me is, ‘I found out I was doing something right,’” Dearing explains. From there, she tries to help clients identify their financial goals and provide them with “bite sized” steps to meet them.

NEXT: Other recommendations for advisers 

Despite the technical and analytical systems that go into creating personalized roadmaps for her clients, Dearing says simply sitting down and listening to clients talk can be just as important in her line of work. White agrees that keeping an ear out for what clients are saying (or not saying) can help advisers determine the emotional templates they reflect.

“Through meetings, you’ll hear more and more stories and they will often venture and tell stories about their life and even their childhood,” White says. “That will bring forth a wealth of information. Pay attention to language they are using … I believe it is the secret ingredient for making much better decisions and having much better relationships.”

 While learning clients’ personality traits can be extremely helpful for advisers, White and Dearing conclude that it’s also crucial for advisers to understand their own emotional templates. By learning their own personality traits, White believes advisers can better understand the kind of approach one should take when consulting a particular client.

“Don’t go in full force with a protector, they’ll just get terrified,” suggests White. In addition, White says it’s critical to understand these concepts before times of heightened market volatility and peril.

“They need to get to know their clients before the market is in turmoil because you want to build a sense of trust and relationship while things are relatively calm,” White explains. 

«