Present Value for Future Payoff

A practice is more than just a way to collect a paycheck, says Jeff Concepcion. Many advisers think of it that way, but when they want to monetize the practice, they’re disappointed.

 

Concepcion,  CEO and founder of Stratos Wealth Partners in Cleveland, explores the steps advisers should take to change their mindset and create a scalable business in his case study, “Turning Your Practice Into a Business: Creating Profitable, Manageable and Sustainable Enterprise Value.”

Mindset can be vitally important, Concepcion tells PLANADVISER. “In the independent space, there’s more risk for someone passing away without a plan,” he says. In the case study, Concepcion speaks with one adviser who finds himself unexpectedly very ill, not at all sure he’ll even be able to return to work, and who admits he has not locked in a succession plan. The story could serve as a wakeup call to those who give only passing thought to the future of their firm.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

A change in business plan and mindset does not always have to have its origins in emergency. Concepcion describes the principal of a large and highly successful advisory practice who came to Stratos for help. “To say that it s unusual for an adviser who s generating well in excess of a million dollars in annual revenue from more than $200MM in assets under management (AUM) to be concerned about his business, would be an understatement,” he says in the case study. “But that was precisely the impetus that motivated this adviser to contact us.”

This successful adviser felt he had reached a point of maximum personal capacity and realized that the business had also reached its capacity and would no longer continue growing, and would likely no longer exist after the adviser’s retirement.

Concepcion describes the transformation of the practice into an organization that could and likely will exist without him. The adviser transferred most of his daily to-do list to a team of specialists, and evolved an individual practice into a scalable business generating nearly twice its previous annual revenue. 

Key Players

Concepcion’s case study asks the questions advisers need to answer about their own practices. Human capital is a vital element, he says. Concepcion suggests looking over the associates in a practice and ranking them in order of critical function. Then, he says, “I’d ask how I can lock in those people and provide incentives for them to stay, for the business as well as my family’s interest.”

The adviser who wants to build enterprise value must be prepared to answer some tough questions. “In my absence, is there still a business?” asks Concepcion. “Are there systems and processes in place that someone would be able to step in and use to continue providing advice to clients and reviews, and professional management, if I didn’t show up tomorrow? Would my staff stay on?”

Bigger practices rely more heavily on other people to do a range of things, such as education or business development. “The principal should absolutely strive to make himself irrelevant,” Concepcion says. “You can of course be as engaged as you like—but now you have something of value. That is a goal of someone who thinks of himself as a business owner. The business does not suffer in your absence.”

Key takeaways from the case study are:

  • Your firm must be more than just you. If it’s going to have real enterprise value, there has to be some type of infrastructure and a mechanism for knowledge-transfer.
  • Identify the unique thing(s) you contribute to your practice that nobody else can contribute at the same level, then offload everything else to others.
  • Select the individuals that you want to be part of the long-term future of your firm, and lock them in.

“Turning Your Practice Into a Business: Creating Profitable, Manageable and Sustainable Enterprise Value” was released by the Alliance for Registered Investment Advisors (aRIA), a research study group that comprises six RIA firms. The case study is available free of charge on the aRIA website

Vanguard Sees Increase in Use of Index Fund Investments

The use of low-cost index funds by participants in Vanguard 401(k) plans increased noticeably between 2004 and 2012.

The average participant now invests 60% of his or her account balance in such index funds, according to a new Vanguard study. The study, “Behavioral Effects and Indexing in DC Participant Accounts 2004–2012,” indicates that this percentage has doubled from 30% in 2004, largely as a result of the growing popularity of index based target-date funds.

The study also finds that the assets in actively managed funds and non-indexable assets, such as money market funds, stable value funds and company stock, decreased over that same eight-year period, going from 32% in 2004 to 19% in 2012.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

“The movement to index investing is good news for participants who are obtaining broadly diversified exposure to the market at a low cost, which can ultimately help them accumulate more money for their retirement,” says Cynthia Pagliaro, lead author of the study and an analyst in Vanguard’s Center for Retirement Research, based in Valley Forge, Pennsylvania.

The study highlights a steep drop in the number of participant accounts invested solely in actively managed funds and finds a concurrent increase in all-index accounts. In 2004, 39% of participants were invested exclusively in active funds. By 2012, this all-active group had decreased to 19%, a relative decline of 51%. Conversely, in 2004, 10% of participants were invested solely in index funds. By 2012, that figure was 38%, a nearly fourfold increase.

The study also finds that older, longer-tenured participants held 100% active portfolios, likely as a result of inertia, meaning these participants never changed their investments. This “inertia effect” is common among existing participants, many of whom never alter their initial allocations. Younger, shorter-tenured participants tended to hold 100% index portfolios, largely because they were automatically enrolled in plans with index based target-date funds as the default investment.

Pagliaro and the other authors of the study also examine how participants allocated their ongoing contributions, which are a better indicator of their future investing intentions than the current composition of their accounts. From 2004 through 2012, the percentage of contributions that participants directed to index funds rose from 32% to 64%, while the percentage directed to active funds declined from 38% to 20%.

Another factor influencing participants’ transition to indexed investments is their plan’s investment menu, according to the study. In recent years, more index funds—primarily indexed target-date funds—have been added to plans because of the sponsors’ desire to reduce participants’ investment costs and exposure to active fund risk. The increased prominence of index funds in plan investment lineups has contributed to participants’ increased adoption of these funds. In addition, for participants who want to voluntarily choose their investments, target-date funds can offer a simplified choice because they can be chosen based on the investors’ expected retirement age.

“The results of this study highlight the critical role that plan sponsors play in the investment strategy of participants,” says Pagliaro. “Due to these behavioral effects, it is likely that the sponsor’s decision will have a profound influence on the investment choices made by their participants.”

More information about the study can be found here.

«