SmartPlan
Enterprise will help educate and engage employees in preparing for their
retirement future. It is an interactive, video-based online retirement
education service created by vWise. Mutual of Omaha is offering the service at
no additional cost to retirement plan advisers or plan sponsors.
SmartPlan
increases plan participation and helps fulfill fiduciary duty while enhancing
print communications and on site meetings, the company says. It uses a
proprietary mix of video and interactive technologies to discuss specific plan
features and benefits along with interactive applications to educate
participants about risk tolerance, plan investments and other key features.
It
also helps plan participants better understand complex information and
ultimately make personalized choices that meet their needs.
SmartPlan
is fully customizable for each sponsor plan. They can brand it with the
provider and/or sponsor logo, and choose which plan provisions the hosts will
discuss, such as auto enrollment, loans and matching contributions.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
Fred
Reish, ESQ, partner and chair of the Financial Services ERISA Team at Drinker
Biddle & Reath, LLP, explained that with the final regulations, the DoL
included a sample guide with details on how to comply with the regulation.
Larry
H. Goldbrum, general counsel, The Spark Institute, added there is a significant
concern with details provided in the sample document by the DoL. He says some service providers think the document does not easily
clarify the details of the regulation. Some
service providers are therefore creating their own high-level
summaries of the regulation
Reish
explained that the requirement for the 404a-5 disclosure of fees from plan
fiduciaries to plan participants will shift the burden onto the service
provider to make sure that the plan sponsor has all the information needed to
deliver the participant disclosures. He said this was not required before.
According
to the DoL documents, this includes, “information or data about the designated
investment alternative that is within the control of, or reasonably available
to the covered service provider and that is required for the covered plan
administrator to comply with the disclosure obligations described in 29 CFR
2550.404a-5(d)(1).” The document adds that 404a-5 information “must be
disclosed as soon as practicable, but not later than the date the investment
alternative is designed by the covered plan.”
Goldbrum
said these regulations are going to cause difficulty for recordkeepers. “I
think in those situations, recordkeepers are going to have to think about their
protocols and their practices,” he said.
Brokerage Accounts
Reish
said that according to the 408(b)(2) service provider fee disclosure
regulation, providers do not have to disclose the expenses of each brokerage
account. “The covered service provider must disclose all applicable information
concerning the brokerage window that is required by the other provisions of the
final rule.”
Reish
added that the provided description must contain information that is sufficient
to permit a responsible plan fiduciary to evaluate the reasonableness of such
compensation in advance of the service arrangement. The description has to be
detailed so a fiduciary can evaluate it.
The
DoL adds that if the information, such as the identity of the payer and
specific descriptions of indirect compensation, are unknown at the time of the
disclosures, then the description does not need to identify the specific payer
prior to the service arrangement. Instead, the description can provide
information that would allow the responsible plan fiduciary to compare the
expected compensation with compensation that would be received by competing
broker/dealers for similar investment services.
Reish
stated that the industry needs to request guidance on when a person picks a
specific investment for which the information is no longer general, whether the
broker has the right to give specific information.
He
added that most broker/dealers provide brochures with information on their
compensation already, including commission structure, forms of compensation,
revenue sharing, etc.
Goldbrum
added, “Our main focus has been dealing with the indirect compensation. This
unknown distinction creates a problem. You are trying to provide the plan
fiduciary with enough information. There should be a way to provide enough
information to evaluable the arrangement with disclosure of the worst-case
scenario.”
Part
of the concern of making a specific disclosure is that many brokerage
firms consider that information proprietary. The revenue sharing or the
indirect compensation arrangement is not unique to the retirement plan. That
might be information that is tied to the entire firm's fund. They consider that
very proprietary. With fee disclosure, this information is going to become
regularly accessible to their competitors, which is a concern.
Plan Sponsor Responsibilities
After
the disclosures are made, Reish said plan sponsors will need to “determine if
all of the covered service providers have made all of the required disclosures.
That is a tough burden. "If they do not get everything from everyone, they
need to request the disclosures in writing,” said Reish.
If
the information is not provided within 90 days, the plan sponsor will need to
terminate the covered service provider. “They can do it in an orderly fashion,
but they will still have to [terminate]. They will also need to report the
covered service provider to the DoL,” said Reish.
He
added that plan sponsors also need to evaluate the disclosure information
provided to them from the covered service providers.