In addition to offering an overview of what the firm calls “Five
Components of a Successful Nonqualified Plan Strategy,” the website provides a
number of interactive tools.
Benchmark My Plan is one such tool and allows
nonqualified plan sponsors to see how their plan compares against others. The
site also offers the NQIQuiz, a test of plan sponsors’ knowledge of NQDCs, as
well as a Plan Review tool that enables sponsors to upload plan-related
documents and receive complimentary nonqualified plan due diligence review.
“The new website presents plan sponsors with a comprehensive
framework for how to think about their plan, what some of the common pitfalls
are, and how to address them to make their plan work for both the company and
participants,” said Mike Curran, Captrust senior vice president of nonqualified
executive benefits.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
This agenda should include a legislative update, economic
update, investment review, plan administration review and plan roadmap. The
quarterly meeting is a great time to discuss these issues in depth, said Greg
Cimmino, managing director at Institutional Investment Consulting.
For the legislative update, it is no surprise that panelists
noted 408(b)(2) and 404(a)(5) fee disclosure regulations, which went into
effect July 1 and August 30, respectively. The Department of Labor (DOL)
website remains a good source for reading about these updates, Cimmino added.
An economic update should involve looking at indexes and
analyzing what has been driving the market during this period, said Sean Laird,
institutional sales, Wells Fargo Advantage Funds. Jobs and housing remain the
top two issues for the economy, he added.
Plan administration should also be reviewed during the
quarterly meeting. Benchmarking against similar plans and reviewing the plan
design is a good idea, said Paul Temple, vice president, national sales
manager, DCIO at OppenheimerFunds. “These plan design issues help set the stage
for participants’ success measures,” he said.
Plan advisers should also have available the previous plan
review to demonstrate follow-up and results achieved since the last review,
Temple said.
“I think a quarterly review is a good time to look at the
service agreement,” Temple said. Advisers and sponsors can discuss whether the
agreement has been followed and if there is a need for changes to that
agreement because of factors like legislative changes, a reduction of employees
or an acquisition.
Plan advisers can also help sponsors look for potential
asset allocation issues, such as high-cash positions in which inflation is
insidious, as well as a domestic investing bias that can result in missed
return opportunities. Participants may have a lack of knowledge about market
performance and a misconception of risk, Temple said.
For example, they may misunderstand global versus
international funds — only 7% of defined contribution (DC) assets are invested in
international equity funds, and 1% are invested in global equity funds.
Plan sponsors must be alert for asset allocation models that
detract from participants’ success, Temple said.
Quarterly reviews are also a good time for plan advisers to
educate sponsors on rate of return, Temple continued. “Rate of return I think is
something plan sponsors really need to pay attention to,” he added.
The last part of the quarterly review agenda is the plan
roadmap. “Just like the agenda, it’s something that changes all the time,”
Cimmino said. His company also combines all four quarterly
reviews for an annual, which he referred to jokingly as the “roadmap on
steroids.”
When performing a quarterly review, panelists agreed that it
is vital to document the meeting minutes. Some committees do not think the
meeting minutes are important, but Cimmino stressed that the documentation is
crucial to protect the plan fiduciary as well as prepare for the next meeting.
“It makes it easier and quicker to prepare for your next quarterly meeting,” he
said.