More than one-third of Generation X and Y (Gen X/Y) investors
surveyed by MFS Investment Management say their need for advice has
increased since the downturn.
The study showed that when compared with their older
peers, Gen X/Y are more likely to express an unmet need in all areas of
an advised relationship – particularly for portfolio management and
account review/rebalancing.
According to a press release, perceived cost is the main
barrier to obtaining financial adviser services. When asked why they do
not have an adviser, 53% of Gen X/Y said it is not worth it or did not
want to pay for it.
A third of survey respondents said they do not need an
adviser (they do it themselves or use friend/family member); 22% cited a
lack of trust; 28% said they do not have enough assets to warrant an
adviser; 10% do not know how to go about finding an adviser; and 12%
reported never being contacted by an adviser.
“Considering the median household investable assets of Gen
X/Y surveyed was $260,000, their responses about financial advice are
staggering – a significant portion of a large demographic group with
considerable assets to invest does not understand the value proposition
of an adviser,” said Bill Finnegan, director of Global Retail Marketing
for MFS, in the press release. “Advisers need to consider what motivates
younger investors and how they prefer to do business and then develop
new strategies to engage them. Failing to engage with Gen X/Y now
potentially limits advisers’ ability to sustain and grow their practices
and may damage Gen X/Y’s ability to establish both strong investing and
saving habits as well as long-term plans for life’s goals.”
MFS surveyed investors with at least $100,000 to invest and
asked them to compare their attitudes and behaviors about investing
today with those before the recent economic downturn and recession.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
Jeff Applegate, Chief Investment Officer of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney (MSSB), said that MSSB believes the theme in 2011 will be “recovery becomes expansion.”
He gave a quick wrap up of the midterm elections and says the results will have two areas of impact on the economy: 1) the Bush tax cuts will most likely be extended, because raising anyone’s taxes in this time of recovery would not make any sense and 2) the new Congress is more keen on free trade than the previous one, which is always good for markets, he said.
He also pointed to December 1 as being an important upcoming event for the economy–when the Deficit Reduction Commission publishes its report on the best ways the government can go about reducing the deficit.He believes it will be a “hard-hitting” report, and will focus in on entitlements such as Social Security and the age of retirement.
Charles Reinhard, a Global Investment Strategist with MSSB, discussed how emerging markets reacted to the global economic crisis.MSSB’s outlook for 2011 shows the global economy growing by 4%, with emerging economies expanding by 6%, and developed countries at a much slower 2%.
Reinhard highlighted two areas in which emerging markets are taking huge strides–their “middle classes” have been growing and strengthening over the past decade (whereas the middle class in developed countries has been shrinking and weakening), and emerging market equities have outperformed developed market equities for the past decade and are expected to continue to do so.The growing middle class in emerging markets will have huge implications for the global economy, Reinhard emphasized.As more people start to get a little bit more money, they’re demands will change–they’ll start traveling, eating different foods, and having higher standards of living.
As for the U.S. economy, Reinhard said we are at the forefront of a “multiyear bull market” and says we have been there since 2009.He said this is not uncommon following a recession; in fact, multiyear bull markets are the norm after recessions and have only not occurred after two recessions: once because of the Cuban Missile Crisis, and again when there was a double-dip recession in the early 1980s (he said we are in the clear from having a double dip recession and are experiencing a slow recovery).
David Darst, a Chief Investment Strategist with MSSB, laid out “background forces” that are currently affecting the economy.They are:
Quantitative Easing Two, more commonly known as QE2. Darst said there has been a big push back from emerging markets, because QE2 will be a good thing for U.S. job growth.
Monetary easing going on “like crazy” in the U.S. and is tightening most everywhere else, in places like China, Brazil, and India.
A “stampede to thrift” in Germany, France, and the U.K.They are avoiding the “financial swine flu,” as Darst put it, that Greece and Ireland are suffering from.
Congressional action or gridlock? How will the new Congress take care of such important issues as taxes, healthcare, and immigration?
Darst said that the government helped with many stimulus projects–what the economy needs now is structural reform in five areas:
Savings and investment reform
More emphasis on educating the public
Debt and deficit reform
Societal disparity (why has Brazil’s middle class grown enormously and the U.S.’s hasn’t at all?) and generational disparity (who is going to take care of the deficit, the Boomers or their kids?)
A strong currency
And lastly, Darst outlined five conclusions that MSSB sees for the global economy in 2011:
We’re in a multi-year bull market.
Even though it will be a bull market, growth will be relatively flat.
Beware of treasury bonds at 2.5% (MSSB is underweight.)
The U.S./China relationship is the most important relationship in the world regarding peace and progress.
It’s not all over for the U.S. We’re going through a “purging, cleansing, transitional period before the Blackberry generation takes over…with stem-cell research, nano-technology, and alternative energies will take the economy to a whole other level,” concluded Darst.