Vanguard Says Sweeps, Auto Enrollment Still Key in Combatting Savings Gaps

Retirement readiness is strong among many workers, but large gaps remain for plan sponsors and advisers to address.


Retirement savings research driven by new modelling methods from the Vanguard Group shows some good results for higher-income earners but a daunting retirement readiness gap for lower-income workers that needs continued attention from the industry.

The Vanguard report released Tuesday found that lower-income workers spend significantly more of their pre-retirement income than those in the middle- or higher-income ranges and therefore face a greater shortfall for retirement readiness, even after accounting for Social Security. The researchers found the following results by annual income:

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

  • $22,000: 96% of income spent before retirement (25th percentile)
  • $42,000: 83% of income spent before retirement (50th percentile)
  • $61,000: 68% of income spent before retirement (70th percentile)
  • $173,000: 43% of income spent before retirement (95th percentile)

The result of that income spend-down, Vanguard found, is a greater need for participants to self-finance retirement beyond Social Security for those in the 50th percentile or lower of income brackets.

Addressing that shortfall is still possible, according to Dave Stinnett, head of strategic retirement consulting at Vanguard, if the retirement industry can continue to get more workers saving in tax-deferred retirement plans, and at higher rates.

Advisers and plan sponsors can help workers save adequately by adopting best practices in retirement plan design: automatic enrollment, annual automatic escalation of savings rates and default investment into a portfolio of stocks and bonds appropriate for retirement goals,” Stinnett said in an emailed response. “Advisers have opportunities to help accelerate this progress.”

Automate It

The retirement industry may see auto-enrollment as a well-known tactic, and the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 will make it mandatory for new workplace plans in 2025. But Stinnett noted that, at the end of 2022, 42% of employer-sponsored DC plans on Vanguard’s recordkeeping system had not yet adopted automatic enrollment.

In the meantime, workers not participating in available plans can be brought in through re-enrollment campaigns, he noted.

“Plan sponsors can also amplify the impact of these design features by conducting re-enrollment campaigns that periodically default nonparticipants into the plan,” he wrote.

Finally, Stinnett points to automatic portability as a way for workers to keep their savings in tax-deferred workplace plans when moving jobs. One industry effort run by the Portability Services Network LLC—a collection of the country’s six largest recordkeepers—has begun a process this month to increase the use of auto-portability among member providers.

Vanguard’s research was based on a proprietary, internal tool using the asset manager’s capital markets forecasts and data on household balance sheets, savings rates and spending patterns to estimate retirement readiness across age groups.

The Vanguard Retirement Readiness Model was then combined with analysis of savers’ “sustainable replacement rate,” the percentage of pre-retirement income a worker can replace throughout retirement in 90% of market and mortality scenarios. That, as compared with the average retirement spending needs across generations, led to the projected savings gap.

Mixed Results

Overall, Stinnett noted, the model showed that younger generations have benefitted from defined contribution plan design, improved financial education and increased savings behaviors. But findings were mixed, with varying outcomes across 12 different income and generational cohorts.

For instance, among late Baby Boomers (ages 61 to 65), high-income workers are on track to meet their retirement spending needs, while low- and middle-income workers are off track. Millennial savers at the 50th income percentile, however, showed a greater chance of sustainable retirement income, according to Vanguard.

The asset manager created its baseline analysis assuming retirees depend on Social Security and financial assets from workplace retirement savings plans. Other factors that may increase or reduce retirement readiness include, according to Vanguard: access to home equity; working longer; investing in better-or-worse-than-expected capital markets; and experiencing a reduction in Social Security payments.

Beyond plan sponsors and advisers working to help participants meet retirement needs, the researchers also suggested changes policymakers—and individuals themselves—can make to create better outcomes.

House Bills Aim to Increase Use, Contribution Amounts For HSAs

Bipartisan legislation looks to address “outdated bureaucratic barriers and red tape” regarding the tax-advantaged health savings accounts.


In an effort to expand eligibility for those wishing to establish and contribute to health savings accounts, the House Committee on Ways and Means approved legislation on September 28 with the goal of making out-of-pocket health care costs more affordable.
 

The bipartisan HSA Improvement Act and the HSA Modernization Act both aim to address “outdated bureaucratic barriers and red tape” that have stood in the way of individuals making the most of these tax-advantaged accounts, according to a release 

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Representative Jason Smith, R-Missouri, the chair of the committee, wrote in a statement that 78% of HSAs are owned by taxpayers making less than $100,000, which he said exemplifies that the accounts are a useful tool for middle- and low-income families. 

“However, we can help those same families better utilize HSAs, save more to cover more of their health care costs, and make more of their fellow citizens—like working seniors, veterans, and Native Americans—eligible to partake in the tax savings and flexible care options provided by HSAs,” Smith stated.  

An HSA must be paired with a high deductible health plan, and it allows a participant to set aside money on a pre-tax basis to pay for qualified medical expenses. The untaxed funds can be used to pay for deductibles, copayments, coinsurance and some other expenses.  

Devenir reported last month that the HSA industry has accumulated $116 billion in assets, as of the first half of 2023.  

However, a 2023 Voya Consumer Insights and Research study showed that knowledge around HSAs is still lacking among employees. The study, which compared employee HSA knowledge from 2020 with 2023, found that while general understanding that these accounts can be used to pay for health care expenses in retirement increased noticeably (to 55% from 43%), knowledge of other uses and benefits, such as using an HSA as an investment vehicle and only being able to contribute when enrolled in an HDHP, showed no discernable change. 

Voya suggested that employers collaborate with intermediaries—such as benefits brokers, financial professionals and consultants—and workplace benefits and savings providers to educate participants on HSAs and implement a program designed for a diverse employee population.  

The HSA Improvement Act 

The legislation (H.R 5688), sponsored by Representatives Earl Bluemenaur, D-Oregon, and Lloyd Smucker, R-Pennsylvania, proposes wider access to HSAs, as it would enable individuals who use key health services, such as direct primary care arrangements or worksite health clinics, to contribute to an HSA and transfer flexible spending account or health reimbursement arrangement dollars into an HSA.  

In addition, the bill would eliminate a prohibition against an individual establishing an HSA if their spouse has an existing flexible spending arrangement. The bill also would allow individuals to convert their own flexible spending or health reimbursement arrangement dollars into an HSA. 

In addition, the bill would eliminate a prohibition against an individual establishing an HSA if their spouse has an existing flexible spending arrangement. The bill also would allow individuals to convert their own flexible spending or health reimbursement arrangement dollars into an HSA. 

HSA Modernization Act 

In order to better align with what an individual might owe in total out-of-pocket expenses and deductibles, the HSA Modernization Act, backed by Beth Van Duyne, R-Texas, proposes increased contribution limits for HSAs. 

The maximum HSA annual contribution for self-only coverage is $3,850, $7,750 for family coverage. The legislation would increase the HSA contribution limit to equal the sum of the annual deductible and out-of-pocket limitation permitted under a HDHP. 

For example, with this legislation in place, the basic limit for 2023 would be $7,500 for self-only coverage and $15,000 for family coverage. Additionally, as present law allows, the basic contribution limit is increased by $1,000 for an eligible participant who has reached age 55 by the end of the tax year.  

The HSA Modernization act also would expand eligibility to participate in HSAs for individuals who are veterans receiving care through the Veterans Administration, working seniors on Medicare, Native Americans and those enrolled in certain health benefit exchange plans.  

Currently, anyone enrolled in any part of Medicare is disqualified from contributing to an HSA. According to a LinkedIn post from William Stuart, director of planning and business analysis at Voya, this provision would strike Medicare from the list of disqualifying coverage, thereby allowing anyone otherwise HSA-eligible to remain eligible to fund an HSA. 

Spouses  also could contribute “catch-up” funds into the same health savings account, rather than having to establish separate accounts for such contributions.  

Another provision would allow the use of an individual’s HSA funds to cover health care services that occurred up to 60 days before the HSA was established.  

The proposal would be effective for tax years beginning after 2025, and the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that this bill would cost an estimated $44 billion over 10 years. 

Both bills now move to the full House of Representatives for consideration.  

«