Most American workers spend less time per year managing an individual retirement account (IRA) than it takes to choose a restaurant on a special occasion, according to an annual survey.
The survey, aptly titled the “TIAA-CREF IRA Survey,” shows
that fewer than two in 10 (17%) working American adults make regular
contributions to an IRA, down from 22% in 2012. Workers age 45 to 54 are the most
likely to contribute to an IRA regularly, at 30%, followed by workers
in Generation X (20%) and Generation Y (11%).
Survey respondents say they are more likely to spend two or more
hours selecting a restaurant for a special occasion (25%) or shopping for a flat
screen TV (21%) or tablet computer (16%) than planning an IRA investment (15%).
Even among those who already have an IRA, more than half (55%) say they spent
less than an hour planning for the investment.
In addition, the number of Americans who would consider an
IRA as part of their retirement strategy has fallen sharply since 2013. Fewer
than half (47%) of those not contributing say they would consider starting an IRA in 2014, down
from 57% last year.
One encouraging result from the survey shows a majority (60%)
of respondents who contribute to an IRA are also putting money aside through an
employer-sponsored retirement plan, such as a 401(k) or 403(b).
Among those with both an IRA and an employer-sponsored plan, a little more than half (53%)
say they contribute to their IRA regardless of whether they’ve reached their
employer-sponsored plan’s employer match limit or employee contribution limit, which
means they could be leaving money on the table.
An executive
summary of the survey is available here.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
Traditional
broker/dealers are considering more direct, digitally enhanced advice models to
meet competitive demands, according to a new analysis from research and
analytics firm Cerulli Associates.
Cerulli draws that conclusion in the first quarter 2014 issue
of The Cerulli Edge – Managed Accounts
Edition, which analyzes the growing impact of direct and online advice
providers on traditional advisory and investment services arrangements.
Overall, firms within traditional advisory channels are
beginning to consider direct broker/dealers as legitimate competitors and are adapting
their business models accordingly, explains Patrick Newcomb, a senior analyst
at Cerulli. This is happening for a number of reasons, according to Cerulli’s analysis,
but one important factor is that investors across all wealth tiers appear to be
growing more accepting of an advice arrangement that does not involve a
face-to-face relationship.
In previous periods, industry decisionmakers assumed that an
in-person relationship was a necessity, especially with higher net worth
clients, but Cerulli has found investors across wealth tiers are increasingly
accepting of alternative arrangements.
Newcomb says there are several benefits to launching a
direct sales and advice platform for traditional broker/dealers and others that
provide financial advice, including creating a funnel for younger advisers on
staff that need help prospecting new clients. Direct models may also help advisory
businesses cultivate younger clients with small account balances, Cerulli says,
who are likely to favor digital forms of advice and who often represent
unprofitable business for advisers working in traditional models.
Cerulli
warns that firms outside of the direct channel need to tread carefully when
entering the direct advice space and building out digital capabilities. If
positioned incorrectly, home offices could wind up competing with their own representatives
and advisers in the field, instead of offering them an additional support service.
Cerulli says the continued evolution of direct service
providers, which generally began operations as discount brokerage trading
platforms but have evolved to offer financial advice and other services,
represents one of the main challenges for traditional firms moving forward. This
is especially true regarding the burgeoning “eRIA” model, under which firms
present a limited and inexpensive advice offering to clients primarily through
electronic means.
Other findings in Cerulli’s analysis show direct providers
have been busy evolving from strictly providing transactional services to
offering investment advice, and in some cases, comprehensive financial
planning. This development is an example of industry convergence rather than external
disruption, Cerulli explains, but it still represents a major challenge for
firms that lack the ability to adapt.
Direct providers are typically advantaged by scalable call
centers and technology platforms, Cerulli says. In many cases, these advances
stemmed from pent-up demand from current clients who were happy with their provider
relationship, but wanted more assistance than was originally available within the
firm’s model.
Key takeaways from this trend, in Cerulli’s analysis,
include the fact that eRIAs are difficult to categorize under one strict competitive
umbrella. Some firms view themselves as computerized
certified financial planners (CFPs) and look to actively replace advisers,
whereas others consider themselves as chartered financial analysts (CFAs) and
see their role more as a distributor of low-cost packaged portfolios—presumably
leaving more room for traditional advisers.
Cerulli says that,
so far, eRIAs appear to be targeting mostly Generation Y investors and younger Millennials
just entering the work force, rather than trying to take away legacy businesses
from traditional firms, which have a stronger standing among older and more
well-established clients. The investors targeted by direct providers also tend
to have lower account balances and are not as attractive for traditional asset
managers, Cerulli says.
Another important
trend is that eRIAs are predominantly using exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to
bring low-cost investments to clients, and they are favoring alternative index
weighting and “smart beta” strategies within client portfolios—in particular equal
weighting, fundamental weighting, and sector weighting.
More about how to obtain a full copy of the Cerulli
analysis is available here.