Investment Product and Service Launches

Pacific Life announces collaboration with Wespath and WTW on qualifying longevity annuity contract option; Principal Global Investors launches active real estate ETF; and BNY Mellon Investment Management partners with UBS to offer model portfolios.

Art by Jackson Epstein

Art by Jackson Epstein





Pacific Life, Wespath and WTW Partner on QLAC Option  

Pacific Life has announced a new collaboration with Wespath Benefits and Investments and WTW to provide the qualifying longevity annuity contract option in Wespath’s LifeStage Retirement Income program.

According to the firms, the optional longevity income protection feature helps protect participants against the risk of outliving their savings. With Pacific Life’s QLAC, participants are guaranteed a retirement income stream starting at age 80, regardless of how long the participant and, if applicable, the participant’s spouse, lives. In addition, the QLAC can help to reduce required minimum distributions, providing additional tax planning options.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Any associated guarantees are subject to the claims-paying ability and financial strength of the issuing insurance company. Product availability and features may vary by state.

Principal Global Investors Launches Active Real Estate ETF

Principal Global Investors has announced the launch of the Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF.

According to Principal Global Investors, this is the firm’s first semi-transparent exchange-traded fund, and it is now available for trading on the New York Stock Exchange. The actively managed fund has a focused concentration on the non-traditional property sectors of the publicly traded U.S. real estate market. Its objective is to seek total return.

Jill Brown, managing director of the U.S. wealth platform at Principal Global Investors, says the new fund combines two core strengths of Principal—active management and real estate investing—to provide clients with a strategy that seeks to improve portfolio outcomes. She notes that the fund is thematic and gives investors exposure to in-demand real estate sectors, with the benefits of a liquid ETF structure.

Due to its concentrated exposure to non-traditional property sectors, Brown says, the Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF can enhance core equity portfolios for investors as a satellite allocation. According to the firm, this approach creates the potential for better portfolio outcomes and higher total returns, with improved diversification generated by the resilient growth characteristics of many public real estate investment trusts in the non-traditional sectors.

Non-traditional real estate sectors include property types like data centers, life sciences facilities, single-family rentals, medical offices and self-storage spaces. According to Principal, these sectors have been highly resilient the past few years. Shifts in the economy and structural themes ranging from demographics and infrastructure to globalization and technological innovation are driving change and opportunity for these non-traditional property types.

BNY Mellon Investment Management Partners with UBS to Offer Model Portfolios 

BNY Mellon Investment Management has announced the launch of a suite of model portfolios designed specifically for clients of UBS Wealth Management USA. Moving forward, UBS’s wealth management clients will have access to BNY Mellon Investment Management’s suite of six model portfolios on the UBS ACCESS platform.

According to BNY Mellon, the models are designed to adapt to market swings and help deliver more consistent results over time. They can provide a foundation to help financial professionals meet their clients’ income-generation goals with disciplined risk mitigation. Featuring an open architecture structure, the portfolios can also identify the most relevant products to contribute toward achieving each model’s investment objective. To help further optimize the portfolios, each portfolio invests in both active and passive investments.

The suite of portfolios capitalizes on three distinct model approaches for income-seeking clients and are also available in tax-aware versions. The first is Stable Income, which allows clients to focus on income in an effort to mitigate downside risk, with a short investment horizon; the second is Strategic Income, which focuses on seeking a higher level of sustainable yield and aims to optimize yield per unit of risk on a longer investment horizon; and the third is Growth and Income, which is designed for multi-generational investing and focuses on providing near-term income while seeking to grow principal.

NFP Named as Defendant in Parallel Molina Healthcare ERISA Suit

The plaintiffs in the suit, who have already sued their plan sponsor, are now bringing a service provider into the litigation.

A new Employee Retirement Income Security Act lawsuit has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, naming NFP Retirement Inc. as the defendant.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The new lawsuit against NFP is closely related to a complaint filed in March, and it includes the same named plaintiffs, who are engaging in litigation individually and as representatives of a proposed class of participants and beneficiaries in a retirement plan offered to the employees of Molina Healthcare.

The original lawsuit targeting Molina Healthcare directly says the defendants caused plan participants to invest in flexPATH’s “untested target-date funds,” which allegedly replaced “established and well-performing target-date funds” previously offered to participants. The defendants are also accused of failing to use the Molina Healthcare plan’s size and bargaining power to obtain reasonable investment management fees.

The new lawsuit almost completely mirrors the original compliant, though it is distinct in that it argues that NFP is also a fiduciary to the retirement plan in question, based on the nature of the advice it allegedly provided to the plan sponsor, and it should therefore face the court’s scrutiny alongside the Molina defendants.

NFP shared the following statement regarding the litigation: “We believe this case is without merit and will vigorously defend ourselves against the plaintiffs’ allegations.”

“Instead of acting in the exclusive best interest of participants, NFP caused the plan to invest in flexPATH’s untested target-date funds, which replaced established and well-performing target-date funds used by participants to meet their retirement needs,” the complaint states. “NFP also caused unreasonable investment management expenses to be charged to the plan.”

Both the new and original lawsuit allege that because flexPATH invested the underlying assets of the TDFs in BlackRock TDFs, additional fees were charged compared to the fees that would have been charged to investors had they invested directly in BlackRock’s funds. The BlackRock LifePath Index TDFs allegedly charge 8 basis points, while flexPATH charged plan participants 26 bps.

“Molina added the flexPATH Index target-date funds to the plan, and NFP presented them to Molina for use in the plan, even though flexPATH’s target-date fund management style had never been used in any target-date fund offered in a 401(k) plan,” the complaint states. “The novel and untested management style of the flexPATH Index target-date funds was magnified by the inexperience of the funds’ investment manager (flexPATH), which had no established track record as an investment manager, had only managed assets for investors since June 2015 and only recently completed the launch of the flexPATH Index target-date funds in January 2016. Despite these facts, Molina placed flexPATH’s target-date funds in the plan on or about May 16, 2016.”

The complaint alleges that the decision to add the flexPATH Index target-date funds to the plan benefitted NFP and flexPATH by providing an immediate and substantial transfer of over $200 million of the plan’s assets into these “brand-new, untested target-date funds.”

“When NFP recommended the flexPATH Index target-date funds to Molina for consideration, those funds did not yet exist,” the complaint alleges. “As a result, there was no actual performance history for NFP to consider when evaluating how the flexPATH Index target-date funds performed under actual market conditions or relative to alternative target-date fund strategies available to the plan.”

The full text of the new complaint is available here.

«