Advisers Slow to Respond to ESG Investing Demand

“Providing advisers with materials that can be used to educate clients about a firm’s approach to ESG investing is crucial in increasing adviser adoption,” says Ed Louis, a senior analyst at Cerulli Associates.

Forty-five percent of U.S. households prefer an environmental, social and governance (ESG) approach to investing, Cerulli Associates learned in a survey. Among those between the ages of 30 and 39, this increases to 64%, and for those younger than 30, it is 67%.

“In response to growing client demand and demographic trends, asset managers are clearly working to develop and launch environmental, social and governance product for client portfolios,” says Ed Louis, a senior analyst at Cerulli. “While wealth managers and other providers are developing the tools to support these efforts, advisers and investors are implementing them in portfolios more slowing than intended.”

Seventy-five percent of advisers who do not employ ESG strategies say they are moderately fearful of negative performance. For 35% of those advisers, it is a major factor. “Additionally, 41% of advisers believe that ESG and socially responsible investing (SRI) strategies do not offer necessary performance,” Louis says.

When asked about challenges to increasing client demand for ESG products, 29% of asset managers say that misperceptions about performance are a major challenge, and 68% say it is a moderate challenge.

“Asset managers recognize that increasing adviser adoption is a long-term project and are working diligently to address these concerns,” Louis says. “Their efforts are achieving some results, as one-fifth of all advisers are beginning to consider using ESG and SRI strategies.”

Additionally, 40% of asset managers say that investors’ lack of knowledge about ESG investing is a major challenge.  “Providing advisers with materials that can be used to educate clients about a firm’s approach to ESG investing is crucial in increasing adviser adoption,” Louis says.

DOL, Reliance Trust Settle ESOP Pricing Lawsuit

Reliance Trust will pay $4,545,454 back to the plan within 30 days.

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina has signed a consent judgment approving a settlement between the Department of Labor (DOL) and Reliance Trust Co. Inc. involving the Tobacco Rag Processors Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP).

The consent judgment requires Reliance Trust to pay $4,545,454 back to the plan within 30 days. Once the payment is made, the Department will assess a civil penalty of $454,545 against Reliance Trust Co. Inc.  

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Investigators in the DOL’s Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) found that, in May 2011, the owners of Tobacco Rag Processors Inc. sold 100% of the company stock to the plan for $82.5 million, purportedly for the benefit of the employees. The EBSA determined the sales price of the company’s stock exceeded fair market value and that Reliance Trust Co. Inc., as plan trustee, did not determine the sales price in good faith.

The agency alleged that Reliance Trust failed to ensure that the financial information provided to the appraiser and used in its valuation was accurate and complete. In addition, it charged that Reliance Trust failed to thoroughly understand the appraiser’s valuation and failed to meaningfully question the assumptions underlying the valuation. As a result, according to the lawsuit, the plan overpaid for the company stock, causing losses to the plan.

Under the terms of the consent judgment, Reliance Trust may not seek direct or indirect contribution or indemnification from Tobacco Rag Processors Inc. or the plan either to pay the judgment or to pay its legal expenses.

«