Managed accounts are often seen as highly personalized
and customizable investment vehicles that can closely match risk taking and risk tolerance; despite a growing number of managed account
offerings from providers, however, usage of the investment vehicle is
still somewhat low.
Tim McCabe, national sales manager at Stadion Money
Management, is squarely in the camp that would like to see managed account usage grow significantly. He estimates the market share for managed accounts (i.e., the number of plan participants who currently own managed accounts) to be around 6%. Matt
Brancato, head of Vanguard DC Advisory Services, puts that number even lower, at 4%.
McCabe attributes this low engagement to certain
“hurdles” the industry needs to overcome, including the high fees historically associated with managed accounts and the complexity they’re often perceived with. Nonetheless,
he says certain advantages such as new technological innovations and more advanced/responsive asset-allocation
strategies make modern managed accounts a compelling competitor for a given retirement plan’s qualified
default investment alternative (QDIA).
Stadion, for example, has built out a solution called StoryLine.
This managed account utilizes underlying exchange-traded funds (ETFs) rather
than the mutual funds typically available in plan sponsor investment menus to achieve significant cost savings.
“Managed account providers will always charge an overlaying
fee on top of the funds in the plan,” explains Stadion CEO Jud Doherty. “Historically that has made it difficult to compete with some of the lower cost options, such as indexed target-date funds. In our
case, we use a pool of ETFs to build the managed account, and they’re generally much less expensive than the funds in the
plan.”
McCabe explains that, by using ETFs in the StoryLine managed accounts that range between eight and 18 basis points, “it makes the proposition of building and offering managed accounts a lot less expensive.” He says this method brings down the costs of
StoryLine to levels “far below what the firm could have charged a decade ago.”
NEXT: Managed account basics have evolved
Leveraging the ETF structure, Stadion is able to deliver managed accounts that are within about 10 basis points of the average fee for an off-the-shelf TDF, McCabe says, “and with that you’re getting
fiduciary protection, phone service, and field support.”
Since StoryLine was launched last spring, Stadion says it
has signed on about 500 plan sponsors. McCabe says clients responded strongly to the simplified onboarding process and what he calls the program's “robo-like”
features, used to gauge and then manage client risk tolerance. At the very start, Stadion provides participants with a 9-point
questionnaire based on behavioral finance concepts. Then, through the plan’s online
interface, participants can also add outside assets and access models
estimating what retirement income would look like after changing contribution
levels.
“We kept it very simple and user friendly,” says McCabe.
“The questions deal with how they feel about investments. They ask things like
‘are they less risky or more risky than their friends?’ In doing that, we feel
we have a good gauge of what their risk tolerance is. And if we do that, we can
get them in the right glide path during their working life; so, they’re going
to stay in that asset allocation as opposed to not knowing what they’re getting
or getting something that doesn’t match their risk tolerance.”
Both Doherty and McCabe acknowledged that managed accounts still have a long way to go in terms of catching up to the popularity of TDFs. In fact, some providers are encouraging a type of hybrid approaching bringing together the best of both worlds.
“We think that target date accounts and managed accounts
work really well together,” says Matt Brancato, head of Vanguard DC Advisory
Services at Vanguard. “We encourage plan sponsors to include both of them in a
plan. They should use the TDF as default for all investors. That improves the
starting point in terms of asset allocation at a very low fee. Then the role of the managed account comes into play as participants build more assets and get more engaged.”
Brancato stresses that managed accounts are most
valuable when participants are most actively engaged with these vehicles, which typically happens as their account values and working tenure grow.
“In order to get the most value out of a managed
account, you have to be quite engaged in the retirement process and very few
investors before they’re close to retirement are engaged enough in managed
accounts to get the real value out of it,” he explains.
NEXT: Education is vital
One of the biggest barriers to managed account enrollment
is the fact that many plan participants simply don’t know that much about them, or they lack
the skills needed to actively manage these accounts. This issue gives employers
and plan sponsors key opportunities to better
educate participants.
In light of recent market volatility, managed accounts could gain momentum if they can prove to be better “shock absorbers” compared with TDFs or other options, argues Sangeeta Moorjani, senior vice president of Fidelity’s
Professional Services Group.
Like Stadion, Fidelity sees plenty
of fuel for managed account momentum, but notes that participants widely need more information about these investment vehicles and how to
use them. According to Fidelity’s client service data collected earlier this
year, 39% of those surveyed who were not investing into a managed account suggested they didn't understand the offering, and 25% said this lack of knowledge is a
major obstacle to future engagement. However, 52% said they would find one
useful after being educated on managed accounts.
McCabe suspects that managed accounts will grow in
popularity, especially as the Department of Labor’s Conflict of Interest mandate
or fiduciary rule goes into effect. He predicts some platform providers may start to offer multiple managed accounts to improve choice (and fiduciary protection) for plan sponsors.
“If the platforms are only offering one managed
account, or it’s a proprietary managed account, they are nervous that this could be construed as a recommendation,” explains
McCabe. “They don’t want to be seen as offering a single solution, so what
we’re seeing is that a good number of well-known national providers are moving towards having two or even three managed account offerings.”
He adds, “Before, it seemed like one was plenty. Now,
it looks like two or three is going to be the norm, and that makes me optimistic that our area of the business is
going to grow dramatically in the next three or four years.”
“We see a lot of evolution in that front,” Brancato
agrees. “There are a lot of great managed account programs today. It’ll be
interesting to see where we go from a technology standpoint. And looking at all
sorts of different options that can be incorporated into a managed account, I
don’t think in five years it’s going to be the same industry that we see today.”