Products September 21, 2017

Voya Bringing Framework Retirement Program to 403(b) Market

The program’s open-architecture design offers access to hundreds of best-in-class mutual fund families. 

Reported by

Framework, the mutual-fund based retirement program by Voya Financial, is now available to plan sponsors across all full-service retirement plan markets served by the firm. These include sponsors servicing 403(b) and 457(b) qualified retirement plans for government, health care, non-profit and higher education employers, as well as those running non-qualified plans.

The program offers recordkeeping services and an open-architecture design providing access to investment options from more than 250 best-in-class fund families. These include active and passive target-date funds (TDFs) managed by Voya Investment Management. The firm says an open platform also offers the ability to work with nearly any fund traded through the National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC).

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Framework also offers optional features including access to third-party services that manage 3(21) and 3(38) investment fiduciary responsibilities. These services are becoming ever more important as portions of the Department of Labor’s Fiduciary Rule undergo implementation.

In addition, Voya’s program offers an in-plan retirement income option, as well as advisory and managed account services.

“We want to make it easier for our partners to work with Voya as they grow their business and demonstrate value to clients” says Heather Lavallee, president of Tax-Exempt Markets for Voya Financial. “While every sponsor has different needs and goals for their benefits programs, one constant is the opportunity to increase access to workplace savings plans and to improve individual savings rates through flexible, comprehensive solutions. Extending our Framework product from the 401(k) space to all workplace retirement plan markets is a way to partner more closely with plan advisers and third-party administrators as we work toward these objectives. This is also an example of how Voya is bringing its strategic business investments to life through products and services that simplify the process for our clients and partners, and provide a more seamless, end-to-end experience for our customers.”

Voya’s Framework specifically is designed to support plans that have between $1 million to $75 million in plan assets.

For more information, visit Voya.com.

Client Service September 21, 2017

Millennials Prefer Human Financial Advisers

A majority of young investors believe human advisers can generate a better ROI than robo-advisers, a recent survey finds.
Reported by

A poll commissioned by the loan refinancing firm LendEDU found that 46.41% of Millennials who are currently saving for retirement use a human financial adviser as opposed to only 24.30% who use a robo-adviser.

In fact, 61.68% of respondents who don’t use an automated adviser say they’ve never heard of one, possibly giving light to an underserved market in the financial services industry.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Still, the survey found that the majority of respondents were somewhat reluctant to letting a machine manage their investments. More than half (62.35%) said robo-advisers are more likely to lose their money, and 51.59% said robo-advisers are more likely to make a mistake managing their money. In addition, 68.92% said human financial advisers are more likely to get a better return on investment (ROI).

When asked what they liked about working with human financial advisers, 53.65% said they make it easy to get started, and 15.88% said they offer the most cost-efficient way to get started. However, only 3.86% said they offered excellent tax efficiency, suggesting advisers may benefit from maximizing client satisfaction in this area.

Perhaps even more surprising, only 9.01% said the main selling point of working with a human was the human touch. Similarly, only 12.3% of respondents working with robo-advisers said they preferred this option because of the technology. LendEDU notes, “The difference is minimal, and technology, one of the huge selling-points of robo-advisors, is really not all too preferred to having the human touch guide your investment strategy.”

A more well-received benefit of robo-advisers, preferred by 17.6% of users, was 24/7 accessibility. Because market swings can happen at any moment, it’s understandable this feature will stand out among investors. Still it’s clear that above all else, Millennials in the study value ease of entering the stock market, and cost-efficiency when it comes to services.

Today, firms are pumping plenty of capital into enhancing the technology that drives robo-advisers – some, with substantial results. However, some research suggests investors prefer robo-advice with a human touch. Thus, several providers including Fidelity Investments, Betterment and RobustWealth are rolling out hybrid solutions that combine the technical features of automated advice with the skills of a financial professional. And although robo-advisers initially sought out the retail investor market, the combination of automated and human advice is also being seen in the defined contribution (DC) space.

Data from the LendEDU study was gathered from a survey of 502 Millennial respondents between the ages of 18 and 34 who are saving for retirement. The full study can be found at lendedu.com. 

«