Retention, Optimism Are Top of Mind

A narrowing optimism gap puts advisers and investors in a more similar state of mind. Retention and improving service are top concerns.

Advisers and investors are increasingly on the same page, Russell Investments finds in its Financial Professional Outlook Survey from the fourth quarter of 2013. 

In the last quarter of the year, adviser optimism dipped to 79% from 83% in the previous quarter, and investor optimist rose slightly, to 36% from 31% in Q3. These may not seem like significant moves, but investor optimism as reported by advisers in fact matched its previous high point reached in February 2011. Similarly, the “optimism gap,” or the difference between adviser and investor optimism, narrowed to a record low of 43%.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

This narrower optimism gap could have an impact on adviser conversations with clients, according to Sam Ushio, director of practice management for Russell Investments’ U.S. adviser-sold business, and author of the report. “Advisers need to be proactive and engage their clients in outcome-oriented conversations,” Ushio tells PLANADVISER.

“On the heels of last year’s dramatic market gains, it’s important to emphasize goals-based discussions rather than take the easy opportunity to discuss performance that’s now in the rearview mirror,” Ushio says. The most successful advisers, according to Russell, are those who anchor their value on achieving goals and not just portfolio management. Clients need an adviser to provide focus and clarity across different types of market conditions. 

More In Common

A surprising survey result, Ushio says, was the commonality of topics initiated by advisers and clients, particularly portfolio rebalancing—the highest-ranked topic for advisers in this most recent survey. “There is a window for advisers to reinforce the benefits of diversification while delivering value in terms of rebalancing back to the plan,” Ushio says. “We encourage advisers to establish an ongoing dialogue with clients to spotlight progress toward goals, rather than recent market performance.”

Growing the book of business and deepening client relationships were mentioned as top concerns of advisers. “Deepening client relationships is a product of first identifying the client’s objectives with a thorough discovery, followed by consistent value delivery that aligns with the client’s goals,” Ushio says. Russell’s coaching program focuses on helping an adviser to gather a deep understanding of a client’s goals. Progress toward these goals must be a focus, Ushio says. A simple process can become complicated if an adviser loses sight of the fact that the primary responsibility of the adviser is helping a client achieve their goals.

To improve retention, advisers need to take action and initiate client conversations and contact. Ushio says a more proactive approach to service is preferable to simply allowing the client to determine when or how often service is necessary. 

The reactionary model often leads to the emergence of two potentially problematic participant segments, Ushio says. “Clients who are at risk because of little to no service, and clients with service demands that weigh down the business’ ability to proactively engage the larger client base.”

To deal with this, Ushio suggests first deciding which clients fall into which segment. Next, set service strategies for each, so that the adviser knows the best proactive efforts to make. Many advisers have inherent business conflicts within their client relationship strategies—not to mention, he says, a lack of strategies. “Observing the economics that drive client profitability can help advisers improve retention by delivering consistent value that aligns with the adviser’s segmentation model,” Ushio says.

Russell Investments conducted the Financial Professional Outlook Survey in November. Responses are from a broad group of 257 U.S. financial advisers representing over 120 firms. The report can be downloaded here.

 

 

 

Social Security, 401(k) Savings Work Together

New analysis concludes that Social Security benefits, along with 401(k) savings, can provide workers with an annual income level representing more than half of preretirement pay.

The analysis from the Washington, D.C.-based Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) finds that, assuming current Social Security benefits are not reduced, 83% to 86% of employees with more than 30 years of eligibility in a 401(k) retirement plan could have sufficient funds to replace at least 60% of their age-64 wages and salary.

When the threshold for a financially successful retirement is increased to 70% replacement of age-64 income, the analysis finds that 73% to 76% of the employee set will still meet that threshold through 401(k) assets and Social Security payments combined. At an 80% replacement rate, the analysis finds that 67% of the lowest income quartile will still meet the threshold if they have had 30 years of access to a 401(k).

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Automatic enrollment in 401(k) plans can also play a role in successful saving for retirement. The EBRI analysis examines auto-enrollment with an annual 1% automatic escalation provision and empirically derived opt-outs, and finds that the probability of success increases substantially for employees in those plans, as follows:

  • Between 88% and 94% could potentially achieve 60% threshold;
  • Between 81% and 90% could achieve a 70% replacement threshold; and
  • Between 73% and 85% could achieve an 80% threshold.
EBRI notes that the use of auto-enrollment as a plan feature has grown significantly since the enactment of the Pension Protection Act of 2006.

With regard to Social Security benefits, Jack VanDerhei, EBRI research director, says that such benefits are an integral component of retirement income security, particularly for lower income workers.

VanDerhei, who is also the author of the analysis, explains, “If we assume, as an example, that a proportional 24% reduction would be applied to Social Security retirement benefits for all simulated workers, the percentage of the lowest-income quartile under voluntary enrollment 401(k) plans with an 80% replacement threshold drops 17 percentage points, from 67% to 50%, while the highest-income quartile—which receives less proportionate benefits from Social Security—drops by only 9 percentage points, from 59% to 50%.”

EBRI research from 2010 indicates that the accumulated retirement savings deficit of American workers, assuming current Social Security retirement benefits, stands around $4.6 trillion, with an individual average of approximately $48,000. The newer analysis finds that if Social Security benefits were to be eliminated, the aggregate deficit would jump to $8.5 trillion and the average would increase to approximately $89,000.

VanDerhei explains that these numbers are present values at retirement age, and represent the additional amount each person in that group would need at age 65 to eliminate their expected deficits in retirement. The analysis also notes that the presence of a defined benefit accrual at age 65 increases the probability of not running short of money in retirement by 11.6 percentage points, and is particularly valuable for the lowest-income quartile but also has a strong impact on the middle class.

More details about the EBRI analysis are discussed under the title, “The Role of Social Security, Defined Benefits, and Private Retirement Accounts in the Face of the Retirement Crisis,” which can be found in the January issue of EBRI Notes.

«