Near-Retirees May Be at Risk for Retirement Income Shortfall

A DCIIA report written by industry players looks at how rising interest rates and inflation are cutting into common retirement income tactics, as well as the new tools generating interest among plan fiduciaries and sponsors.

Near-retirees and retirees could face a retirement-income shortfall due in part to the extended period of low interest rates, according to new research by the Defined Contribution Institutional Investment Association.

A decade of low interest rates (as well as current rates, which are still historically low) and high inflation may be eroding the success of retirement income planning, with retirees at risk of turning to savings at a faster rate than expected, DCIIA members wrote in the report.

“Retirees and near-retirees are generally more exposed to interest rate and inflation risks in their portfolios, given higher levels of fixed income holdings and a shorter investment horizon,” the DCIIA report said. “After an extended period of low interest rates, this demographic today may be more at risk of experiencing income shortfall, price depreciation and purchasing power erosion.”

People with heavy exposure to fixed-income investments, such as bonds, will likely face lower regular payments from the investment because they were purchased when rates where low, the association said. Meanwhile, inflation can cut into buying power, as the cost of everyday items increases at a higher rate than bond yields.

“If inflation continues to hold at rates higher than prevailing bond yields, retirees may suffer prolonged and possibly permanent loss of purchasing power if they are forced to withdraw larger amounts from their savings to fund their retirement expenses,” DCIIA said.

Target-date funds, which gradually shift savers into more conservative, fixed-income assets, are a key reason for this potential shortfall, the report said. Since TDFs are used by a whopping 81% of participants, according to Vanguard, many people with workplace plans who are close to or in retirement have been weighted toward fixed income investments.

“The shift into TDFs over the past 15 years, in addition to the enormous growth of DC plans, has led to more fixed-income assets being held by participants ages 55 and older just as interest payments retirees can expect to receive from fixed income have decreased.”

Contributors to the report included researchers from industry players Capital Group, Institutional Retirement Income Council (which advocates for retirement income strategies in DC plans), and PGIM, the investment management business of Prudential Financial.

The ‘Retirement Tier’

While investing in TDFs has been an effective strategy for accumulating assets, their success in providing regular income in retirement—or the decumulation phase—has not been tested, DCIIA said. That has led to an industry-wide effort by asset managers, recordkeepers and insurers to create products that can link TDFs with income-focused strategies to help retirees and near-retirees.

According to DCIIA, plan sponsors are more frequently giving “retirement-tier” participants some options. Though each has its own limitation in the current financial environment, the most popular include:

  • Fixed Income Annuities: These insurance contracts are a popular way to provide regular payments in retirement. However, they tend to mirror bond interest rates and so, if purchased in a low-interest-rate environment, will return lower yields than their historical average, DCIIA said.
  • Bond Laddering Strategies: This strategy involves buying multiple bonds with different maturity dates, then reinvesting the principal into new bonds if they are offering higher rates. This strategy can be difficult to personalize within a defined contribution plan, DCIIA said.
  • Systematic Withdrawal Strategies: This basic approach is for the retiree to withdraw a specific amount of money, adjusted for inflation, out of retirement each year. Here again, providing a solution that can withdraw the correct amount can be hard to personalize within a defined contribution retirement plan.

The limitations of these offerings, combined with the current low-rate environment, inflation and growing interest in retirement income, has kicked off increased innovation in defined contribution plans, DCIIA said. Some newer, but even less-tested strategies include:

  • Deferred fixed annuities attached to a TDF series: This strategy automatically shifts a TDF’s glidepath to a retirement income option. Instead of moving retirement savings into only fixed income as people age, it puts their money into annuities that can offer a regular paycheck when they retire.
  • Guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefit attached to a TDF series: This strategy uses a variable annuity within a TDF, giving participants the ability to take part in growth when markets rise, while also baking in a floor to protect them at least to a certain level when markets decline. Both fixed and variable annuities have been criticized for high fees.
  • Social Security optimization through a DC bridge strategy: If a retiree delays taking Social Security, it can increase payments by about 8% every year, DCIIA noted. A bridging strategy has retirees tap their defined contribution assets as a “bridge” to get to a higher Social Security payout.

While many of these options have either been available or in discussion for years, “plan adoption has been modest,” the DCIIA report stated. The current moment may push these strategies forward as near-retirees realize their savings and income options may not be enough.

“Plan sponsors that serve retirees in-plan are in a unique position to potentially offer a higher level of retirement security than counterparts that offer only accumulation-oriented, pre-retirement solutions in-plan,” the DCIIA report said. “Plan sponsors may want to consider helping them mitigate challenges posed by persistently low interest rates and rising inflation.”