Deals & People June 23, 2015

Anova Consulting Expands with Three Hires

Anova Consulting Group has added two executive interviewers and one senior research analyst to its staff.
Reported by

Louise Revers, Laurie Grabner and Mardan Flynn have been named to new positions at Anova Consulting Group.

Revers, who has been hired as an executive interviewer, brings more than 25 years of experience in marketing and business development to conduct in-depth interviews for Anova’s technology clients. She has extensive experience managing market research initiatives spanning diverse industries in start-up and growth environments. Previously, as director of client services she drove client satisfaction for leading global brands at Communispace. Prior to that, Revers was the senior manager of market intelligence and analysis at Genuity, one of the first Internet service providers. Revers also has extensive experience executing marketing communications and business development programs via her work as marketing director at International Data Corporation.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Flynn, who has been hired as a senior research analyst, will utilize her decade-long experience in the financial services industry to work with Anova’s defined contribution (DC) clients, creating customized research programs, analyzing the findings, and providing actionable recommendations. Before coming to Anova, Flynn was a senior research relationship manager at Cerulli Associates and a senior associate in client management at Cambridge Associates.

Grabner, an editor and executive interviewer, will conduct research projects for clients across Anova’s DC and investment management practices. During her career, Grabner ran a successful consulting business providing marketing strategy and communications for a variety of retirement and financial services clients including Bank of America, Fidelity, John Hancock Funds, UPromise, SBLI, ING and Putnam Investments. She has also worked in senior-level sales and marketing roles at Scudder Kemper Investments and Columbia Management Group.

Anova Consulting Group is a market research and consulting firm based in Brookline, Massachusetts.
Data & Research June 23, 2015

Personal Analysis Needed for Faculty Reluctant to Retire

Unconfirmed assumptions often appear to underlie a reluctance to retire.
Reported by

The retirement patterns of senior faculty are an issue of ongoing interest in higher education: If a significant share of tenured faculty works past “normal” retirement age, challenges can arise for institutional leadership focused on keeping the faculty workforce dynamic for purposes of teaching, research and service.

TIAA-CREF’s Faculty Career and Retirement Survey finds tenured faculty age 50 or older can divided into three groups—35% expect to retire by normal retirement age; 16% would prefer to retire by normal retirement age, but expect to work longer (they are “reluctantly reluctant”); and 49% would like to and expect to work past normal retirement age (they are “reluctant by choice”). Personal finances are a particular barrier for those reluctantly reluctant. Psychosocial factors are the issue with those reluctant by choice.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

However, one-half to two-thirds of those reluctantly reluctant appear to be assuming a financial barrier because they have not done a careful evaluation of their retirement finances. In addition, among those reluctant by choice, anywhere from 60% to 90% have not seriously considered what they could do with their time in retirement.

Faculty reporting a defined benefit (DB) pension as their primary retirement plan are 20 percentage points more likely to expect to retire by normal retirement age than are faculty with a defined contribution (DC) plan as their primary retirement plan.

Approximately 40% of traditional retirees and those reluctant by choice are very confident they will have enough money to live comfortably throughout retirement. At the same time, 14% of those reluctant by choice and 8% of traditional retirees are not confident about having enough money during retirement. By comparison, 28% of those reluctantly reluctant are not confident in their retirement income prospects, and only 16% are very confident.

NEXT: Addressing assumptions.

While finances are a driving barrier among those reluctantly reluctant, less than one-half (47%) report having done a careful evaluation of their financial situation and when they can afford to retire. A greater share of both traditional retirees (68%) and those reluctant by choice (62%) have done so.

Furthermore, 53% of reluctantly reluctants have received retirement planning advice from a professional adviser within the past three years, and among these, 58% received advice regarding when they can afford to retire. This means only 31% of reluctantly reluctants have received advice from a professional adviser about when they can afford to retire. In essence, one-half to two-thirds of those reluctantly reluctant to retire assume that they cannot afford to retire, as opposed to know that they cannot afford it.

Their assumptions need to be tested since they may or may not be correct; a financial review could reveal that an individual is actually able to retire at his or her preferred time, TIAA-CREF says in its survey report. In cases where assumptions are validated by a review, the review would quantify the magnitude of the shortfall and the time needed to make it up. It may also reveal manageable changes in saving behavior that would speed recovery time. Financial reviews beginning in mid-career could pre-empt the situation of someone approaching retirement age with (the perception of having) inadequate financial assets, TIAA-CREF suggests.

An analogous dynamic is at play among those reluctant by choice regarding how they could spend their time if retired; 39% report having done a careful evaluation of this. The figure among those reluctantly reluctant is also 39%, but it’s 50% among traditional retirees. And again, this likely overstates the degree of evaluation that has actually occurred.

Less than 10% of those reluctant by choice have worked with a professional adviser in considering how to spend their time if retired. So anywhere from 60% to 90% of those reluctant by choice have not seriously considered what they could do with their time in retirement. This implies that pulls to retirement exist that many have not considered them, and these pulls might outweigh pulls to continued work for an unknown share of those reluctant by choice, TIAA-CREF says.

TIAA-CREF’s survey report is available here.

«