Most Americans Identify Themselves as Savers

Financial wellness programs can leverage employees' financial personalities to decide their approach to financial wellness programs, PwC says.

Asked about their attitude towards money, 51% of Americans, the largest percentage, say they are savers, according to PwC’s 2018 Financial Wellness Survey.

In fact, this is true for each generation: Millennials, Gen X and Baby Boomers. However, nearly one-third of savers have less than $50,000 saved for retirement, and more than one-third would not be able to meet basic expenses if they were out of work for an extended time. Furthermore, one-quarter of savers are having a hard time meeting monthly household expenses or are using credit cards to pay for necessities.

This shows that savers need help, PwC says. They good news is that this group is motivated, so financial wellness programs should encourage people to check in with a coach for periodic financial check-ups, PwC says. “This group welcomes opportunities to talk periodically with a financial coach to refine what may be vague retirement goals, find out if they’re on track, and develop bite-sized action steps for follow up and accountability,” PwC says. “This approach helps improve employee confidence and opens the door for future financial coaching on other topics.”

Givers, which 18% of the American population identifies themselves as, are risking their own financial security and need help understanding the ramifications of this, PwC says. Nearly half have less than $50,000 saved for retirement, and two-thirds either don’t have sufficient emergency savings or do not know what to do. Only 35% are confident they will be able to retire, compared to 55% of savers. One-quarter of givers have taken out a loan from their retirement account.

To serve this population, financial wellness programs should—ever so gently, as this group’s heart is in the right place—explain the impact of putting someone else before themselves, such as paying for a child’s education rather than saving for retirement. It would also be helpful to show this group how much they need to save for retirement, as this might inspire them to get on track.

Sixteen percent of the population identifies themselves as spenders. Not surprisingly, 75% of this group consistently carry credit card balances, and 45% have taken out a loan from their retirement account. This group is the most likely to stress out over their finances.

This group is particularly receptive to financial wellness programs from their employer that help them manage cash and debt, PwC says. “Given that spenders are the most likely to find it embarrassing to ask for help with their finances, it’s critical that financial wellness program messaging acknowledge that it is not a sign of weakness to seek help,” PwC says. “Make sure to emphasize that working with a financial coach doesn’t mean they’ll be judged or tested on their financial knowledge.”

Nine percent of the population says they are risk haters. Less than one-third of this group is confident they will be able to retire. This group could best be helped by estimating their insurance needs, PwC says. They are also receptive to getting a second opinion from a financial coach.

Finally, 5% of the population say they are hands off when it comes to money, and 1% say they are gamblers. More than half of the hands-off group are stressed about their finances, with emergency savings and retirement being their foremost concerns.

Even though hands-off and gamblers may not be receptive to a financial wellness program, if it embraces their autonomy but offers the resources of a financial coach, they might participate in such a program, PwC says.

PwC’s findings are based on a survey of 1,600 workers. The report can be downloaded from here.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Views of ESG Investing Changing Among Institutional Investors

The percentage of U.S. institutional investors that reject ESG outright shrank dramatically year over year, from 51% to 34%, according to RBC Global Asset Management’s third annual Responsible Investing Survey.

Institutional investors in the U.S. continue to view the application of environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles in investing more cautiously than other countries, but the percentage that reject ESG outright shrank dramatically year over year, from 51% to 34%, according to RBC Global Asset Management’s third annual Responsible Investing Survey.

Forty-three percent of institutional investors incorporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into their investing, up from 22% in 2013, according to a report from Callan.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

RBC’s global survey found a dramatic shift in attitudes toward ESG analysis is visible among U.S. institutional investors, as 24% said they believe an ESG-integrated portfolio would outperform its counterpart, nearly five times the percentage in last year’s survey. About 18% of U.S. respondents still said they believe the ESG-integrated portfolio would perform worse, but that negative sentiment is down from 26% in the 2017 survey.

One of the key issues in the responsible investing debate is whether ESG analysis should be considered a source of alpha, and U.S. investors reported sharply higher confidence in 2018, with 39% now saying ESG analysis generates alpha, more than double last year’s 17%. As the U.S. has been one of the biggest holdouts against wider adoption of ESG principles, this increase is a meaningful indication that opposition is eroding, RBC contends.

In 2017, just 28% of respondents said they thought ESG could be a risk mitigator; this year, that number climbed to 54%. The number of U.S. respondents who said otherwise nearly halved: to 24% this year from 50% last year.

The 2018 survey also shows a turnaround regarding the question of fiduciary duty. More than half of all respondents that incorporate ESG factors into their investment approach now say that doing so is part of their fiduciary duty, double last year’s level.

Equities have long been the primary focus of ESG analysis and investing and that remains true among many institutional investors according to this year’s survey: However, ESG analysis is moving beyond equities. Alternatives, which ranked fifth overall in ESG integration, came in third in the U.S. behind equity and fixed income and ahead of infrastructure and real estate. Thirty-percent in the U.S. said it is important to incorporate ESG into fixed-income. Asked directly whether they incorporate ESG into fixed-income management, 52% of U.S. investors that use ESG said yes.

As responsible investing has developed, the discussion about how to apply the principles in a portfolio has evolved from negative screens (often excluding so-called ‘sin’ stocks such as alcohol, tobacco and firearms companies) to a range of approaches that are more nuanced and more multifaceted. Discussions about exclusion have in many cases evolved and now encompass a range of different approaches to responsible investing. When RBC asked if respondents required asset managers to apply socially responsible screens to portfolios, 76% of all respondents said no. Resistance to such screens was higher in North America and the UK, where no more than 20% of respondents use screens.

“As industry acceptance of ESG integration has accelerated and becomes mainstream, there will be greater focus on ESG-related investment research and its application in the portfolio management process,” says Habib Subjally, senior portfolio manager and head global equities at RBC Global Asset Management (UK) Limited. “And as the demand for responsible investment solutions grows, asset managers and consultants will increasingly be called upon to offer guidance to their clients about responsible investing options that support their long-term financial goals.”

«