Eighty-five percent of Millennials believe it is important
to start saving for retirement before age 28, but, in fact, among people of all age groups, only 55% start saving before that time,
according to Cerulli. The most frequently cited reason for not starting to save
for retirement is that they do not make enough money.
“For Millennials, who are generally at the lower end of the income spectrum and
face a host of competing financial priorities, this is often a legitimate
reason,” says Cerulli Analyst Dan Cook. “Thinking of retirement, which is 30 to
40 years away, in the same light as immediate savings needs such as rent,
mortgage and groceries is also a challenge for this group. Education on topics
such as personal budgeting, student loan debt and adjustments to spending
habits can help Millennials free up funds for retirement savings that they
previously thought were unavailable.”
Company matches can also motivate Millennials to start saving, Cerulli says, as
79% of those younger than 30 and 70% of those between the ages of 30 and 39
said company matches would be very motivating to them to increase their
401(k) contributions. “This group of younger investors communicates that, if
their employer were to offer greater matching contributions, they would be
highly likely to save more for retirement,” Cook says.
Millennials also greatly value online tools; 37% of those younger than 30 and 45% of those between the ages of 30 and 39 value 401(k)
online tools. By comparison, only 4% of those older than 70 find online
tools valuable.
“Members of this demographic frequently interact with digital bands and applications
such as Amazon, Uber and Facebook,” Cook says. “Providers should recognize that
Millennials are accustomed to these digital interactions and seek to engage
them in this fashion.”
Benchmarking Managed Accounts Against Participant Goals
Some industry experts believe managed account performance should
not be benchmarked against an index but instead against an investor’s unique
individual goals.
A critical question for advisers to ask when suggesting
managed accounts to a plan sponsor client is whether it is possible to
benchmark a managed account’s performance in a consistent way across the plan
population.
Since each managed account will be customized for an
individual participant, taking into consideration their risk tolerance, account
balance, compensation, deferral rate and outside assets, the process of benchmarking
managed accounts can get quite complicated.
As Kendrick Wakeman, president of FinMason, an investment
analytics firm in Boston, puts it, “A managed account is designed to take into
account a participant’s specific tolerance for risk and their financial
situation to determine how much investment risk they should have in their
portfolio.” Given the wide range in individuals’ financial circumstances across any employee
population, it’s reasonable to assume there will be some diversity in their
managed account construction.
Jason Grantz, director of institutional retirement
consulting at Unified Trust Company in Highland Park, New Jersey, says it is
important for managed account providers to understand what sponsors would like
to see their plans accomplish. “For instance, if the goal is to replace 70% of income in retirement and they are starting out at a 40% level, measuring
how that improves is a good way to benchmark the progress of a managed
account.”
Since a managed account is really a service rather than a
product, Grantz says, it really does not make sense to benchmark the managed
account’s performance against an index. “If you are invested in a large-cap
core fund, you do want to benchmark it against a large-cap core index to see if
it is hugging the index,” Grantz says. “But a managed account is a customized
service, and it should be measured against the participant’s stated objective.”
Anton Honikman, CEO of managed account provider MyVest in
San Francisco, agrees: “The traditional concept of benchmarking a mutual fund
is inappropriate for a managed account due to its customization. If you are
personalizing an investment solution, you are doing so to meet the
plan participant’s goals, be they to replace a certain percentage of their
final income or to have a certain amount of money saved.”
NEXT: Behavioral
benchmarks can be used
There are other aspects to a managed account that advisers
should assess as well in determining whether the managed account succeeds in
achieving a participant’s desired retirement outcome, says Ken Verzella, vice
president, innovation of investment solutions at MassMutual Workplace Solutions
in Enfield, Connecticut. “To determine whether the managed account is of value,
foremost to look at is fees,” Verzella says. “The adviser should look at how
they are constructed, whether they are flat or tiered, and whether they
decrease as assets in the account increase.”
The next is to assess the construction methodology of the
managed account provider, he says. “The major providers of managed accounts
make this readily available. The role of the financial intermediary is to help
the plan sponsor understand the methodology because it gets very technical.”
Then, naturally, the adviser should be monitoring the funds
in the plan, which are selected for each managed account, Verzella says.
“There are behavioral benchmarks associated with managed
accounts, as well,” he says. “Advisers should be looking at whether managed
accounts prompt participants to save more and whether they stay the course.”
However, Kyle McCauley, managing partner of City Center
Financial in Troy, Michigan, believes that by determining what portion of a
managed account is invested in equities, bonds or other types of investments,
it is possible to benchmark the performance of each managed account against a
traditional index.
“A managed portfolio can generally be benchmarked by keeping
the relative allocations split between the known benchmarks,” McCauley says.
“An example of this would be a managed portfolio that consists of 60% equity
positions and 40% bond positions. For such a managed portfolio, you would
generally be fine to use 60% of the S&P 500 Total Return Index performance
and 40% of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Total Return Index.”
Thus, it is possible to benchmark a managed account, whether
it is against a participant’s stated goals or a traditional index.