Early Financial Lessons Can Deliver

Even basic financial education in high school may help people feel more comfortable with financial matters later in life, according to a survey from MoneyRates.com. 

The survey suggests relatively few Americans—and especially few women—have received much financial education in a formal academic setting. Respondents who received little or no financial education were much less likely to rate themselves as proficient in financial concepts than the respondents who reported receiving more financial education in high school.

According to MoneyRates.com, the women surveyed reported receiving significantly less financial education than their male counterparts, though the poll results indicate that both sexes benefit from this type of education. Overall, nearly two-thirds (64%) of respondents indicated they received little or no instruction on financial topics in high school. Selecting for the sexes, just 29% of women in the survey said they received some or a lot of financial education in high school, compared with 43% for men.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Poll participants were asked about how much financial education they received in high school: a lot, some, a little or none. Then they were asked how knowledgeable they are about personal financial issues as adults, allowing for a comparison between how much instruction they received in high school and how comfortable they are with the subjects today.

This analysis shows people who received financial education in high school are much more likely to be comfortable with financial topics today. Sixty-one percent of adults who say they received a lot of personal finance instruction in high school now characterize themselves as fluent in both basic and advanced financial topics. This number drops substantially, to 22%, for people who received only “some but not a lot” of instruction, and falls even lower for people who received little or no personal finance education (19%) in the classroom.

Interestingly, the survey found most people think financial education should be offered in school—or even required. In fact, 62% of poll respondents said that financial education should be a requirement in high school, with an even stronger majority (88%) indicating it should at least be available.

Eighty-two percent of women who received some or a lot of financial education in high school said they have a strong understanding of at least basic financial concepts, compared with just 71% of women who received little or no education. Among men, that gap was slightly larger (85% versus 64%). So while men seem to benefit more, both sexes appear to be helped significantly by financial education in high school.

More on the survey results is available here.

Retirement Plan Size, Equity Holdings Drive Fees

Plan size, average participant account balance, and percentage of plan assets invested in diversified equity holdings are drivers of defined contribution (DC) plan fees, a study finds.

Specifically, for the companies surveyed, plans with more participants and higher average account balances typically had lower all-in fees, benefitting from economies of scale by spreading fixed administrative costs over more assets and participants. In addition, plans with higher allocations to diversified equity holdings tended to have higher all-in fees as a percentage of plan assets, consistent with the fact that equity investment options generally have higher expenses than other types of investments.

“Consistent with prior years, this study helps to differentiate the factors that drive fees from a number of other plan features that do not appear to have a significant impact on fees for the companies studied,” explains Scott Parker, a principal with Deloitte Consulting LLP who led the research effort. “It’s notable that the primary drivers of fees continue to be the size of the plan as measured by number of participants and average account balance, as opposed to other features that might be associated with complexity in servicing plans, which did not appear to have a significant effect on fees.”

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The study looks at total fees charged across a broad sample of 357 employers, representing 361 DC plans with $1 million or more in plan assets. These plans had a range of plan sizes, service levels, investment offerings, retirement service providers, and fee structures. Using an exclusive survey that gathered data from each of the plans studied, Deloitte researchers calculated an “all-in” fee for each plan. The all-in fee captures administrative, recordkeeping, and investment-related fees—whether paid by the plan sponsor, the participant, or the plan—as a percentage of plan assets.

Though any individual participant’s experience depends on the DC plan offered by his or her employer, the median DC plan participant is in a plan with an all-in fee of 0.67% of assets, based on plans included in the study. Across all participants, the all-in fee ranged from 0.29% of assets (the 10th percentile participant) to 1.29% of assets (the 90th percentile participant). The median annual “all-in” fee per participant translates to about $267.

Deloitte ICI study all in fee range

“401(k) and other DC plans represent about one-quarter of Americans’ retirement assets and play a vital role in Americans’ retirement security,” says Sarah Holden, ICI senior director of retirement and investor research. “This study can inform policymakers, employers, plan service providers, and workers about what plans cost and what factors are the key drivers of plan fees.”

The 361 plans were surveyed from June through December 2013, and collectively, the sample covered 2.7 million participants and $240 billion in plan assets.

To better represent the universe of 401(k) plans, survey responses were weighted according to Department of Labor (DOL) data based on plan assets and number of plan participants. Though 87.3% of all 401(k) plans have fewer than 100 participants, large shares of assets (45.5%) and participants (40.9%) are in plans with 10,000 or more participants. 

To focus on the fee experience of workers in 401(k) plans, all-in fee results in the report typically are calculated on a participant-weighted basis. Because the sample included plans with $1 million or more in assets, results were weighted to the comparable DOL universe of 401(k) plans with $1 million or more in assets.

The study report, “Inside the Structure of Defined Contribution/401(k) Plan Fees, 2013,” is here.

«