According to “Pensions Funds DIY: A Hands-On Future for Asset Owners,” driving this change is the challenge of building a holistic view of risk across a multi-asset portfolio while aggregating risk data from multiple managers, aligning interests and managing costs. “Pension funds’ desire to deliver strong investment returns to their participants coupled with improved oversight and governance and is leading to a need for more in-house accountability for asset and risk management,” says Martin J. Sullivan, head of Asset Owner sector solutions for North America, State Street. “However, this undertaking requires pension funds to carefully evaluate how to achieve a balance of in-house and external talent, tools and technologies.”
A research survey of 134 pension fund executives conducted in conjunction with the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) finds a majority of pension fund respondents (81%) indicate they are exploring bringing more asset management responsibilities in-house over the next three years. This is due in part to cost concerns, with 29% indicating it is a challenge for them to justify the fees of their asset managers.
As part of this shift, a majority of pension funds (53%) are expecting to use more lower-cost strategies to achieve desired investment outcomes, as well as expanding the number of technology platforms and software solutions they employ (43%). More than half (51%) of funds place a high priority on strengthening their governance over the next three years.
Three-quarters of pension funds surveyed will ramp up their risk appetite as the search for returns intensifies in a tough investment climate. The survey results show private equity will be the biggest winner from a surge in alternative investments by pension funds. Emerging market investments are also becoming more important.
“While the largest and most sophisticated funds can handle most aspects of multi-asset class portfolios in-house, the majority of pension funds will need to make a choice about where to be a specialist and when a sub-contractor is needed,” says Sullivan. “This shift underscores pension funds’ need for new, more collaborative partnerships with asset managers who can offer them transparency and effectively tailor investment ideas and solutions to their unique needs.”
On behalf of State Street, the EIU conducted a global survey of institutional asset owners during July and August of 2014, spanning both defined contribution and defined benefit assets. Forty-two percent of respondents were from the Americas, 36% from Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) and 22% from Asia Pacific. Fifty-two percent of respondents came from public sector pension funds, 31% from private sector pension systems and 16% from superannuation funds.
In some ways, women suffer the
burden of the loss more intensely than men, according to the 2014 New York Life
“Loss of a Spouse Study,” with 40% of widows reporting negative lifestyle
changes the year following the loss, compared with 24% of widowers.
The financial impact was even
greater: two thirds of widows experienced a significant financial change
compared with half of widowers. The top five life changes following the loss
were financial, with a greater percentage of widows feeling the punch of a
financial blow. Here are some examples:
Adjusting to a negative change in income level (55% of
widows vs. 34% of widowers);
Budgeting for one income (46% of widows vs. 32% of
widowers);
Cutting discretionary spending (38% vs. 24%);
No longer being able to afford a vacation (22% vs.
13%); and
No longer adequately saving for retirement (21% vs.
10%).
Lifestyle changes were even more
dire for some widows; two in five widows without life insurance at the time of
the loss (39%) reported they were struggling to meet basic needs within the
first year of the loss.
Every day, advisers help prepare
clients for loss, says Chris Blunt, co-president of the insurance and
agency group at New York Life. First step is a needs analysis, Blunt tells
PLANADVISER, which is simply sitting down with a family at their kitchen table
to discuss the income needs of the household and how those needs are being met.
“Then the discussion moves to
thinking through what would happen with the loss of one of the partners,” Blunt
says. “Do both spouses work? What happens if there is a loss of one income? If
one partner is a stay-at-home spouse, how would the responsibilities of that
person be met if he or she passed away?”
The best thing an adviser can do is
get the spouse involved ahead of time, says Steven Dimitriou, managing partner of
Mayflower Advisors in Boston. “Even if she is not making the current decisions,
at least providing an education on the financial plan and making sure she is
aware of all assets, where those assets are held and whom to contact can be an
enormous benefit that clears the fog of confusion and fear,” Dimitriou tells
PLANADVISER.
The loss of potential income, or
increased cost to cover the spouse who stays at home, is not the only
consideration, Blunt notes. The cost of the mortgage, any educational
costs—current and future—and retirement savings must be addressed.
Easing Worry
Blunt recommends working with an
adviser to help with financial decisions when a family’s finances are
insufficient. “Ideally, it is an adviser who they already have a relationship
with,” he says. “That way, there is a trusted relationship that can help
alleviate some of the worry and burden.” Advisers provide a strong sense of
support following the loss of a spouse, the New York Life study found, and the
majority of widows continue to retain their financial adviser. Of those widows
who had a financial adviser, 87% were able to rely on that adviser and 85%
retained the adviser they had before the loss.
In Dimitriou’s view, the top three
items on a to-do list are: update beneficiaries; identify goals; and get the
right education. “You would be surprised how often a surviving spouse forgets
to update beneficiary information on IRAs, 401ks, annuities, insurance
policies, and so on,” he says. If these issues are not properly addressed ahead
of time, they can lead to enormous issues in an estate and conflicts with
wills.
Next, he says, a widowed spouse who
finds herself in the driver’s seat may have very different goals for how she
wants to use money and live the rest of her life. “The first thing she should
do is figure out what she wants,” Dimitriou says. “Perhaps she wants to live
closer to the beach than the golf course, or be closer to the grandchildren. Maybe
she is not comfortable with the same level of volatility or does not need as
high a monthly income.” It may sound simple, but actually identifying goals,
creating a plan and tweaking a portfolio to is important and provides a strong
sense of control.
Last, Dimitriou says, people tend
to fear what they do not know. He recommends that women take the time to learn
about their assets and liabilities, the investment products they are using and
their financial plan. “The power and control they gain over their lives by
doing so can be liberating and help them to better identify who should be
helping them,” he says.
Planning Is Key
The financial plan a household has
should ideally meet these financial needs if one spouse should die, Blunt says.
“However, our survey found that this often was not the case for many Americans.
In fact, approximately half of women (47%) report that they wish they had some
or more life insurance to help cushion the financial impact of their loss. Many
couples need to pay more attention to their financial plans before the loss of
a spouse to ensure their financial security blanket is enough.”
New York Life identified a number of
tasks widows wished they had done before the loss of a spouse, which can be
used as lessons learned for couples or women who want to be better prepared.
Something as simple as organizing
important papers—wills, insurance and bank documents—in one central location
along with passwords can be helpful during a stressful time. Many widows wished
they had had a good financial plan in place, with a number citing “more savings”
and “more life insurance.” A financial adviser should make sure a family’s
financial plan is designed to accommodate the needs if one spouse dies. Widows
wished they had discussions about what would happen financially if one of the
couple passed. Even though it can be an uncomfortable discussion, it is one
widows wished they had had.
Most recently widowed spouses are
so overwhelmed by other events that the last thing they want to deal with is
another huge unknown, Dimitriou says. “If the adviser has never communicated
with the spouse in the past, he has built no level of trust and personal comfort,”
he points out. “That is why the majority leave the husband’s financial adviser
in favor of someone that will just take care of things for her.”
The 2014 New York Life “Loss of a
Spouse Study” analyzed how the loss of a spouse impacted widows and widowers
from both a financial and emotional perspective. The 897 widows and widowers,
widowed within the past 10 years, were age 65 and under (33%) or over the age
of 65 (67%) when the study was conducted online in June by GfK’s public affairs
and corporate communications division.