Retirement Losses among Worst Effects of Recession

Some 56% of respondents in a recent survey said their retirement savings losses were among the most significant impacts on their lives from the economic downturn.

An American Express news release about its spending poll also reported that 54% of respondents cited stock market losses, while 74% pointed to the trauma of seeing family and friends affected by the recession as key impacts the recession had on their lives.

Among the 40% of respondents who said they would spend less in the next 30 days, the top three reasons were “trying to save money,” “reducing debt,” and that they “have the money but feel now is not the time to spend.” Further, when asked what they would do with $500 of found money, 26% would save it, while one-third of respondents said they would pay off their regular monthly bills.

American Express said young professionals were more optimistic about the economy and more likely to increase spending during the next 30 days (24% versus 14% of the affluent and 10% of the general population).

The American Express poll was completed online among 2,032 consumers aged 18 and older. Interviewing was conducted by Echo Research between August 28 and 30. The poll divided into two subsets: affluent respondents (having a minimum annual household income of $100,000) and young professionals (younger than 30 years of age, having a college degree, and a minimum annual household income of $50,000).

Boeing Change to Retiree Health Benefits Gets Court Approval

A court ruled that Boeing Co. did not violate the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) or the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA) when it presented changes to retirees' health benefits in a 2006 collective bargaining agreement (CBA).

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois has rejected the United Auto Workers’ argument that benefits as set out in previous CBAs were vested and could not be changed. According to the opinion, previous CBAs stated the benefits would be provided “for the duration of the Agreement.”

Union officials said there was no language in the agreements because there had always been an understanding between the union and the company that the benefits would be provided to retirees and their beneficiaries for life.

In addition, the court found there was nothing in the CBAs that restricted Boeing’s right to make changes to its retiree health benefits, and that since the CBAs required that Boeing provide the retirees with the same coverage as that provided to active employees, Boeing could make changes to retiree benefits that put them in line with those of active employees without violating the CBAs.

The CBAs at issue in the case covered employees and retirees of Boeing Rotorcraft. The 2006 CBA made changes to medical plan options, and increased deductibles, copayments, and benefit payment levels. It also froze the amount of Medicare Part B premium reimbursement provided per month for eligible retirees and dependents.

The opinion in Boeing Co. v. March is here.

«