Public Retirement Plan Mortality Tables Released by SOA

The Society of Actuaries points out that the financial impact of implementing the new public pension mortality tables will vary based on each individual job category, as well as the relative mix of member ages and other demographics in each pension plan.

The Society of Actuaries (SOA) released first-of-its-kind public retirement plan mortality tables, Pub-2010, which includes the individual mortality experience for teachers (school teachers, college professors), public safety professionals (police, firefighters, correctional officers) and general employees (judges, military, administrative staff).

The SOA is releasing public plan mortality tables to give pension actuaries and plan sponsors current information to assist in setting mortality assumptions. This is the first time it has studied public retirement plan mortality separately from the private sector.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Last August, the SOA released an exposure draft of the new public retirement plan mortality tables and requested comments. It developed the new tables once it was determined that public pensions have differing levels of mortality than private pensions.

The SOA’s mortality tables include 46 million life-years of exposure data and 580,000 deaths from 78 public pension plans and 35 public pension systems across the country. Analysis of the dataset reveals that teachers have the longest age-65 life expectancy of the job categories studied. Further, the amount-weighted, deferred-to-62 annuity values produced by the public-sector teachers’ tables were consistently larger than those produced by corresponding public safety and general employee tables. Generally speaking, this means that pension obligations for teachers are greater than obligations for other job categories, when comparing the same benefit amount.

The tables also suggest that higher income is correlated with lower mortality, as income succeeded job category as the most statistically significant mortality factor across all job categories.

The SOA points out that the financial impact of implementing the new public pension mortality tables will vary based on each individual job category, as well as the relative mix of member ages and other demographics in each pension plan. It encourages professionals in the field to perform their own analysis to understand the impact of these tables on their own plan. “It is ultimately up to plan sponsors, working with their plan actuaries, to determine how to incorporate emerging mortality and mortality improvement into their plan valuations,” the SOA says.

Baby Boomers Far More Confident About Retirement Than Gen X

Three-quarters of Baby Boomers think they will have enough money to live comfortably during retirement, but only 35% of Gen Xers share this optimism.

Seventy-five percent of Baby Boomers think they will have enough money to live comfortably in retirement, but this is true for only 35% of Gen X, according to a new report from Retirement Living, “Retirement Preparedness Study 2019: Baby Boomers vs. Generation X.”

Boomers are relying primarily on pensions and 401(k) plans, while Gen Xers are relying on 401(k)s and individual retirement accounts (IRAs). Both Boomers and Gen Xers are relying or expect to rely on Social Security for a portion of their monthly income. Seventy-three percent of Boomers rely on Social Security for 25% to 100% of their monthly income—and 85% of Gen X’ers expect to do the same.

Fifty percent of Boomers and Gen Xers have saved or are on track to save $700,000 or less. Generally, Boomers think that is adequate savings, while Gen Xers do not.

The survey found 65% of Boomers saving for retirement are men and 35% are female. Among Gen X, this is evenly split at 50% for each sex.

Boomers, when asked that they would have done differently with regards to their retirement savings, say investing differently or playing the stock market better, reducing spending and living on a budget, and investing more in a Roth IRA rather than a traditional IRA.

Among the 14% of pre-retirees not saving for retirement, stagnant wages, student loan debt and the cost of living were cited as reasons.

Retirement Living’s findings are based on a survey of 562 adults. More about the study may be found here.


Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

«