In the teleconference, Borzi said the proposed updates to the definition of who is a fiduciary will allow the DoL to better protect plan participants and beneficiaries (see “DoL Broadens Fiduciary Net“).
She expanded on EBSA’s reasoning for updating fiduciary guidelines in a blog post issued after the call: “Since 1975, despite major changes across the retirement landscape, the definition of a fiduciary for purposes of providing investment advice to employee benefit plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), has remained the same. The current definition requires a cumbersome and fact-intensive five-step analysis to determine who is considered a fiduciary. This analysis is increasingly difficult to administer in today’s marketplace given the complicated nature of new investment products, a dramatic shift from defined benefit plans to defined contribution plans, and complex inter-relationships between and among plan advisors and their affiliates,” wrote Borzi.
Borzi said EBSA’s investigations and enforcement actions “have made it clear that current rules under ERISA and subsequent guidance have hindered the department from protecting participants and establishing who is a fiduciary and who is not.” The proposed rule changes the defenses some entities have used to get out of personal liability for faulty advice or conflicts of interest.
For example, Borzi said, appraisers providing evalutations for ESOPs; any investment adviser under the Investment Company Act of 1940; and those who hold themselves out as fiduciaries yet use current rules to avoid liability when something goes awry, will always be considered fiduciaries under the proposal.
The two main implications for those who find themselves a fiduciary under the new definition are that they will be subject to a duty of loyalty and prudence and they will be personally liable for a breach, according to Borzi. She added that the new definition will weed out those who are giving shabby advice.
Borzi noted the new definition will really help small and medium-sized plans that face liability because they are relying on advice by an entity that could use current rules to avoid fiduciary status. “We will be able to hold accountable those who are really responsible for the plan injury,” she stated.
Fred Wong, senior employee benefits law specialist, and author of the proposed regulation, said it is not designed to treat as a fiduciary a target-date fund investment manager for selecting underlying funds.
Wong also noted that the proposal will not only affect employer-sponsored arrangements, but also those IRAs subject to ERISA, as the rule extends to the Department of Labor’s authority under Section 4975 prohibited transaction rules.