Making Retirement Income Projections Useful

Plan participants need advisers to go beyond just awareness of their balance to thinking about that balance in the form of retirement income or an income stream.

Art by Scott Bakal


As the retirement industry increasingly focuses on helping plan participants not only with the accumulation of plan assets but with decumulation as well, there’s been deeper emphasis on the importance of making income projections as useful—and accurate—as possible.

“For the past 40 years, since ERISA, we have been telling people ‘Here’s what you need to do, how to think about saving, here’s an employer match’ but we never told them what their number should be,” says Sri Reddy, senior vice president, retirement income and solutions at Principal. “And that number varies by person. We don’t know what their lifestyles are and what their expenses are.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Many recordkeepers have been offering retirement income projection in some form for years, and the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement  Act of 2019 created a new requirement that the Department of Labor mandate and standardize the provision of recurring lifetime income projections for individual participants on an annual basis.

That’s a positive step forward for the industry, says David Stinnett, principal, and head of Vanguard Strategic Retirement Consulting Group.

“It’s a very helpful evolution for participants to go beyond just awareness of their balance to thinking about that balance in the form of retirement income or an income stream,” he explains. “Because many people see the balance and the next logical question is ‘Is this good? Is it enough? Will it last?’”

Reaching the unengaged

Participants who hadn’t previously seen retirement income illustrations within their website account should have at the latest received the data with their third-quarter statement. Just because such illustrations are available, however, does not mean that participants are seeing them. Reddy points out that many participants don’t regularly check their 401(k) statements—and they’re even less likely to do so when markets are down as they currently are.

“There’s a self-selection bias in our industry, and the people who are predisposed to use these tools are the ones who are already more engaged in their finances and they’re already doing OK,” says Nathan Voris, director, investments, insights and consultant services for Schwab Retirement Plan Services.. “We need to think about how to reach those folks that aren’t engaged.”

Voris says that advisers can add value there, by creating content and other connection opportunities to reach those participants. For the unengaged, simply looking at the retirement income projections and starting to think about their progress toward retirement could be a major step and enough to spur them to engage further with the plan.

“We have to make sure we’re delivering simple advice for folks who have a simple scenario,” Voris says.

Of course, for those with a more complicated financial picture, retirement income projections are only useful if recordkeepers can capture a participant’s assets from different sources—a system which some recordkeepers have in place now. However, even the most robust digital tools require engagement from the participant to log in and input information about their external assets such as IRAs, pensions or 401(k)s from a former employer; Social Security projections; spousal assets; debt; age of planned retirement; and other factors.

More education needed

In addition to understanding how their current 401(k) balance fits into their broader financial picture, participants need assistance in creating a plan for how to efficiently tap into those and other funds that they have available.

“If you don’t provide education around how to think about longevity and drawing down their income, participants over assume how much they can take out,” Reddy says.

At a minimum, advisers should be working with sponsors to make sure that dynamic lifetime income calculators and tools are front and center on the participant platform for those who want to go deeper than the static number they find in their account statement, says Stinnett.

“When people are logging on, they shouldn’t have to hunt around for it,” he adds. “And there should be an effort into encouraging plan participants to log in and engage with that tool.”

There is also an opportunity for advisers, who can assist participants gather the relevant information and help them make sense of the income projections that the data creates.

“As a company, we are trying to use those digital tools to do this type of planning at scale, but there has to be a human interaction, encouraging participation in that process,” says Andrew Jefferys, senior vice president at OneDigital Financial Services. “For the 55-and-over crowd, they need full financial planning with a licensed and accredited counselor helping along the way.”

A personalized approach

Understanding retirement income projections is only one step in the process of planning for decumulation. Workers need to be able to put that figure into context based on their retirement income needs, but only 30% of workers have created a retirement savings goal based on their estimated expenses in retirement, and 21% don’t have a retirement savings goal at all, according to Principal data. More than a third of workers list ‘lack of retirement income planning’ as one reason they don’t feel they’ll be financially comfortable in retirement.

While advisers can help sponsors deliver financial wellness tools that address these issues at a high level, many individuals need more customized support to make sense of retirement income projections.

“Historically, especially in large plans, some advisers have shied away from engaging the participants on one-on-one levels,” Jefferys says. “But I think that’s the way of the future. As much scale as the world tries to achieve from profit margins and costs, ultimately. we should be encouraging sponsors to be advocates for financial advisers coming in to help participants in the workplace or at home.”

Six Misconceptions About Social Security That Can Affect Participants

Not recognizing the impact of claiming benefits early – or the benefit of waiting – is essential.

Art by Scott Bakal

 


Social Security is an important part of retirement income planning, but the rules are complicated and misconceptions about the program can cause people to make decisions that may not be in their best interests. The 2022 Schroders U.S. Retirement Survey found that 32% of respondents plan to claim benefits before age 70 because they are concerned that Social Security will be depleted and/or stop making payments. They may end up with reduced payouts for life—especially if they claim benefits before their full retirement age—because they didn’t realize that Social Security benefits are not about to stop entirely. “That’s the biggest misconception,” says Joel Schiffman, head of strategic partnerships at Schroders.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Understanding these misconceptions can help plan advisers educate participants about key Social Security concepts that can affect their claiming decisions and their retirement savings goals—and ultimately their retirement security.

Addressing the following six misconceptions can help when planning education programs about Social Security for participants:

Believing that Social Security benefits will be discontinued. Every year, when the Social Security Trustees’ report comes out, the news is filled with headlines about the trust fund running out of money, which prompts some people to take benefits early because they worry they won’t get anything if they wait. That’s not what would happen, however.

Instead, if nothing changes by 2035, benefits would be slightly reduced but not eliminated. “If we hit 2035 and nothing has changed, that doesn’t mean benefits just stop being paid,” says Tim Steffen, director of tax planning, private wealth management, for Robert W. Baird & Co. “As long as there are people working and paying taxes into the system, there will be money to pay benefits of some kind. Social Security estimates that benefits would fall by 20%—but 80% of benefits is still a lot better than nothing.”

This is also assuming that Congress doesn’t make any changes before then, such as putting more money in the trust funds, increasing the payroll contributions, or increasing the full retirement age, says Schiffman.

Not recognizing the impact of claiming benefits early—or the benefits of waiting. Even though you can claim Social Security benefits as early as age 62, your monthly payouts will be permanently reduced by 25% to 30% from your full benefits. Some people need the money early—almost one-third of the respondents in the Schroders survey said they planned to take benefits before age 70 because they expected they would need the money sooner. But some don’t realize the benefits of waiting: Participants can delay receiving benefits until up to age 70, and monthly payments will increase by 8% for every year they wait past full retirement age.

Schiffman recommends reminding participants to review their Social Security statements each year, which shows the different monthly payout estimates based on the year they start claiming benefits. People can access their statement any time by setting up a MySocialSecurity account, which can happen at any age regardless of when they plan to claim benefits.

Thinking the full retirement age is still 65. For years, the age for receiving full Social Security benefits was 65. But that hasn’t been the case for a while. If you were born between 1943 and 1954, your full retirement age is 66, and the age gradually increases by a few months for every birth year, until it currently tops out at age 67 for people born in 1960 and later.

The full retirement age not only affects the size of benefits, but also has an impact on other issues—for example, taking benefits before the full retirement age could affect survivors’ benefits for a spouse.

Also, if a participant is still working and is younger than full retirement age, Social Security benefits may be temporarily reduced if they earn more than a certain amount from working. However, after the full retirement age is reached, earnings won’t affect benefits.

“People do not understand the impact of their income if they are working in retirement, and we see an increasing number of people who want to work in retirement,” says Keri Dogan, senior vice president of retirement income solutions for Fidelity, which recently launched a personalized Social Security benefit calculator.

Not realizing that the Medicare age is still 65. “If you’re retired, you need to apply for Medicare at 65, even if you choose to delay Social Security to age 70,” says  Steffen.

Participants already receiving early Social Security benefits before age 65 will be enrolled in Medicare automatically. But everyone else needs to take steps to enroll in Medicare themselves at the Social Security Administration website during the initial enrollment period, which begins three months before the month they turn 65 and lasts for three months afterwards—even if they aren’t ready to start taking Social Security benefits yet.

Unless the beneficiary or spouse are still working and have health insurance from a current employer, they need to sign up for Medicare at age 65 or be subject to a late enrollment penalty. If the health insurance is from an employer with fewer than 20 employees, participants may still need to enroll in Medicare at 65 to avoid coverage gaps. More information about the Medicare enrollment rules can be found online.

Not realizing that Medicare premiums are subtracted from Social Security benefits. If both Social Security and Medicare are being received, in most cases Medicare premiums are subtracted automatically from Social Security benefits.

Most people don’t pay a premium for Medicare Part A because they or their spouse paid Medicare taxes from working for at least 40 calendar quarters (10 years). But most people will pay $164.90 per month for Medicare Part B in 2023. High earners pay more. Single people with a modified adjusted gross income as of the last tax return on file (generally 2021 for 2023 premiums) was more than $97,000 if single, or $194,000 if married filing jointly, they must pay a high-income surcharge, called an “income-related monthly adjustment amount,” that boosts monthly premiums to $230.80 to $560.50 in 2023, depending on income. Withdrawals from tax-deferred retirement savings are included in the adjusted gross income calculation—which can be one reason to consider saving some money in Roth accounts.

If income has changed since the last tax return on file because of certain life-changing events, such as retirement, divorce or death of a spouse, you can request the Social Security Administration to base premiums on more-recent income and reduce or eliminate the surcharge.

Not realizing how Social Security benefits are taxed. The taxation of Social Security benefits is tricky, but many people pay taxes on at least part of their benefits. “The good news is that at least some portion of your Social Security benefits will be tax-free,” says Steffen.

If a person’s “combined income,” which includes adjusted gross income, plus nontaxable interest and half of Social Security benefits, is from $25,000 to $34,000 for single filers ($32,000 to $44,000 for married filing jointly) then they may have to pay tax on up to 50% of Social Security benefits. If your total income is above those levels, up to 85% of your benefits may be taxable.

Knowing these tax rules can be important to keep in mind when deciding which accounts to tap for retirement income each year, especially if they have some tax-free money in a Roth that won’t be included in this calculation. “If they just retired and are looking to generate income, which levers can they pull?” says Dogan. They can look at various withdrawal options and the impact on taxes and other benefits, he says.

Knowing how the states’ tax Social Security benefits can also affect retirement budget. “Most states don’t tax this income, either—something to consider as you think about relocating for retirement,” says Steffen.

«

 

You’re viewing the third of three free articles.

  This is your final free article. 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.

Close