Auto Features Boosting Participation, Savings Rates

Retirement plan participation and savings rates are rising due to adoption of automatic plan features, says Vanguard in “How America Saves 2014.”

Automatic enrollment increases participation, but it also has a positive effect on other auto features, the analysis finds. Among plans that automatically enroll employees, 69% also automatically increase their contribution rates annually and 98% use target-date funds, a balanced investment option or managed account as the default investment option. Vanguard’s report is an annual look at investor trends in the 401(k) and other defined contribution (DC) retirement plans that the firm administers.

The use of auto features has a particularly positive impact on low-income, young, and minority workers, who are showing gains in participation and contribution rates, the report says. By income level, workers earning less than $30,000 showed the most dramatic gains in participation, when comparing voluntary enrollment (34%) with automatic enrollment (78%). As income levels increased, the gain dropped; among the highest paid workers participation from voluntary enrollment was 88% versus 96% from automatic enrollment.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Other stark gains are seen in enrollment by race when auto enrollment is implemented. Among African Americans earning less than $29,999, participation was 35% with voluntary enrollment and 93% with auto enrollment. Hispanics in the same income category show participation rates of 36% and 94%, respectively. Both demographics have some economic challenges. (See “Hispanic Americans Face Saving Challenges” and “Progress, Hurdles Continue for African Americans.”)

These improvements in savings, and in increases, in enrollment from the use of auto features will continue to push upward, says Jean Young of Vanguard’s Center for Retirement Research and lead author of the report.“We predict over half of Vanguard participants will be using professionally managed options in five years,” Young tells PLANADVISER

Young adds that “in 2013, 62% of new plan entrants joined through automatic enrollment,” noting that initially, auto enrollment applied only to new hires in many plans, but is now increasingly used for eligible nonparticipants in half of those plans. Employees who joined their plan through automatic enrollment had an overall participation rate of 82%, compared with a participation rate of 65% for employees who joined through voluntary enrollment.

Auto Investment Choices

Among the auto enrollment plans that use TDFs, a balanced fund, or managed account as the default investment, nine in10 use TDFs.

TDFs have several advantages over managed accounts or balanced funds, Young says. Among other things, they may help participants focus on a specific year they might retire, perhaps acting as an engagement device. “TDFs, especially indexed TDFs, tend to have a lower cost structure,” Young adds. “The advantage of this lower cost structure compounds over time. Most participants aren’t confident in their ability to construct portfolios, but they do have a sense of when they plan to retire.”

In 2013, 40% of participants were solely invested in an automatic investment program, compared with 22% at the end of 2008. Of those, 31% were invested in a single TDF, another 6% held a balanced fund, and 3% used a managed account program. These options can dramatically improve portfolio diversification compared with participants making choices on their own. With the growing use of TDFs, Vanguard anticipates 58% of all participants and 80% of new plan entrants will be entirely invested in a professionally managed option by 2018.

Young states emphatically that professionally managed accounts help improve outcomes for participants. “Professional management gives participants consistently better outcomes compared to those participants who construct their own portfolios,” she says. If left to their own devices to “do it on their own,” she says, the outcomes can be quite scattered. “Some do it right, but is it skill, or is it luck?” she asks.

Design for Success

“A quarter of Americans are estimated to be partially prepared for retirement but need help getting the rest of the way,” Young says. Another one-quarter are thought to be at risk for not being able to save enough for retirement altogether. Plan features such as automatic enrollment, annual savings increases and balanced default investment options are ways for employers to do more to help both these groups, she suggests.

Young also recommended re-enrollment, another emerging plan design strategy, in which plan sponsors address portfolio construction issues by moving participants into investments such as TDFs, balanced funds and managed accounts.

Other findings of "How America Saves 2014" include:

  • The average participant account balance was $101,650 in 2013. Among continuous participants—those with a balance between year-end 2008 and 2013—the median account balance rose by 182%, reflecting both the effect of ongoing contributions and market returns during this period. "Balances are now well ahead of the peak levels achieved prior to the global financial crisis. The effects of the market decline on retirement savings are now firmly in the past," Young says.
  • Given the growing focus on plan fees, more plans are offering a wider range of low-cost index, or passive, funds. In 2013, nearly half of Vanguard plans offered an index core, which is a comprehensive set of low-cost index options that span the global capital markets.
  • Large plans have adopted this approach more quickly, resulting in about 60% of all Vanguard participants offered an index core. Factoring in indexed TDFs with their equity and fixed-income mix, 84% of participants hold equity index investments.

 

”How America Saves” is based on an analysis of Vanguard’s recordkeeping plans. The findings are based on overall retirement saving and investing behavior of Vanguard’s more than three million participants, and the report includes supplemental reports about participant patterns in the defined contribution (DC) retirement plans of 12 industries. The report can be accessed from Vanguard’s website.

Millennials Learned Lesson About Saving

A majority (80%) of Millennial Americans say the recession of 2008 taught them they have to save “now” to “survive” economic problems down the road.

More than half (55%) are saving for retirement; however, 45% are not, according to the Wells Fargo Millennial Survey. The savings picture varies by gender, with 61% of men and 50% of women reporting they are saving.

Wells Fargo says this difference in saving rates may hinge on the fact that the median annual household income reported by Millennial men is $77,000 versus $56,000 for women. For college-educated Millennials, median annual household income is reported to be $83,000 for men and $63,000 for women.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

About half of all Millennials report they are “satisfied” with their savings at this point in their lives, but the gender discrepancy is pronounced, with 58% of men feeling satisfied, versus 41% of women.

Of those Millennials who have started saving, nearly half (46%) are saving between 1% and 5% of their income for retirement; 31% are saving 6% to 10%; and 18% are saving more than 10%. The percentage of income saved by men and women greatly varies, with half of women (53%) saving between 1% and 5%, versus 39% of men. The percentages of men and women who are saving at the 6% to 10% level are both about one-third; however, more than one-quarter of Millennial men (26%) are saving at a rate greater than 10% versus only 9% of women.

Seven in 10 (72%) Millennials are confident they will be able to save enough to create the lifestyle they want in the future, but Millennial women are far less confident than their male counterparts, with 63% expressing confidence versus 80% of men.

Of the Millennials who are not saving yet, 84% say they are not doing so because they “do not have enough money to save right now,” with no difference between the genders. The survey found 55% of Millennials favor a mandatory retirement savings policy.

Debt Dilemma

Millennials are struggling under the pressure of debt, with 42% saying "it is their biggest financial concern currently.” Four in 10 say their debt is "overwhelming." By gender, 45% of Millennial women feel “overwhelmed” by debt, versus 33% of Millennial men. More than half of Millennials (56%) say they are “living paycheck to paycheck,” regardless of gender.

When asked to rank their number one financial concern after paying day-to-day bills, Millennials cite paying off student loans (29%). When asked to estimate certain categories of debt as a percentage of monthly pay, Millennials report their debt breaks down, on average, as follows: credit card debt, 16%; mortgage debt, 15%; student loan debt, 12%; auto debt, 9%; and medical debt, 5%. Among all Millennials, 47% are allocating 50% or more of their paychecks to these types of debt.

Though college debt makes up a big part of the Millennial financial picture, three-quarters (76%) of Millennials who attended college agree that their college education was worth the cost. More than half of Millennials (56%) report relying on student loans to finance college. Since debt is a top financial concern for most Millennials, the most important financial advice they would impart to someone starting out is: “Don’t spend more than you earn” (33%), followed by “Get educated about your personal finances” (17%), and “Start saving for retirement now” (16%).

Financial Confidence

Despite debt concerns, three-quarters of Millennials are confident they have the knowledge to address any financial problems in the next 10 years, with 70% of Millennial women agreeing with this versus 84% of Millennial men. While their confidence is high, when it comes to estimating their retirement needs, 40% of Millennials say they have “no idea” what amount they will need. Nearly one-third (31%) say they will need less than $1 million, while 15% say they will need $1 million to $2 million.

Millennials feel confident in many aspects of their personal lives, with seven in 10 (69%) saying they feel better off financially than others in their own generation. In addition, 68% of Millennials expect their standard of living before retirement to be better than their parents.

When asked whom they trust for credible information to help them make financial decisions, a majority cited “family” (57%), followed by “financial institutions” (54%) and “personal finance experts/personalities” (50%). More than half of Millennials (55%) do not think they have enough money to have a financial adviser, but 16% are using a paid professional, up from 8% a year ago. Similar to last year, 59% of Millennials who do not use a paid adviser say they would prefer a “seasoned adviser” with years of experience, but there was a slight rise this year (from 20% to 26%) among those who want an adviser closer to their age, who can potentially better understand their financial goals.

Despite the ups and downs of the market, 59% of Millennials say the stock market is the best place to invest for retirement, representing a roughly 10 percentage point increase from last year’s study. However, the genders view the stock market differently, with only half of Millennial women (49%), and 69% of Millennial men agreeing that the stock market is the best place to invest for retirement.

One-quarter of Millennials who are saving for retirement are “not sure” how much of their savings are invested in stocks or mutual funds. About one in five (18%) say they are invested 100% in stocks or mutual funds, 26% say they are in a range of 50% to 75% in stocks or mutual funds. Thirty percent say they are invested 25% or less in stocks or mutual funds.

The 2014 Wells Fargo Millennial study was conducted online by Harris Poll on behalf of the Wells Fargo Wealth, Brokerage, and Retirement (WBR) team between April 15 and May 2. Survey respondents included 1,639 Millennials between the ages of 22 and 33, as well as 1,529 Baby Boomers between the ages of 49 and 59.

«