Participant Education Requires Innovation, 1-on-1 Coaching in Hybrid Labor Market

PLANADVISER spoke to experts about how they provide financial wellness education to meet the needs of today’s participants.
Special Coverage

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, company leaders have had to rethink the environment they provide for workers, from managing a workforce with hybrid schedules to abandoning office space altogether. But the need to provide retirement plan participant education and engagement, particularly in light of Peak 65 retirement in 2024, has only increased.

The challenge, then, is for plan advisers to help their clients navigate these new workforce norms while, ideally, increasing participant offerings.

“I think a hybrid work force makes it hard to engage with participants because you can’t go into an office and see them,” says Jason Chepnik, senior vice president of retirement and wealth at OneDigital. “The last three and a half years have been challenging to find new tricks and new things to do. “

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Chepnik says against the backdrop of economic uncertainty, it has been challenging to get people to slow down and think about decisions they are making. Advisers must constantly re-evaluate their menu of services to ensure they can meet the ever-changing needs of participants.

Best Ways to Connect

“I think what plan sponsors really enjoy the most is having access to the one-on-ones, especially as most people are moving to virtual or hybrid work environments,” Chepnik says.

He says his advisory team is getting a lot of “positive feedback” from 20-minute, one-on-one meetings with participants. OneDigital has also found success segmenting the business by small, mid and large clients, he says. Depending on the pricing, they can generate education programs that fit client needs while also being profitable for the firm.

“For our larger plans and larger market clients, we’ll do custom events,” he says. “We will do a wellness event, something fun and engaging. It depends on market size and the clients’ budget.”

SageView Advisory Group has been providing participant education in the form of group meetings, one-on-one coaching and education for many years, says Kerry Woods, SageView’s vice president of participation education and engagement. Woods joined the firm in January in conjunction with the launch of PersonalSAGE, its financial wellness platform. She says the popularity of financial wellness offerings largely depends on the plan sponsor and its employees.

“We see heavy engagement within group meetings and webinars,” Woods says, though digital and online tools draw even more traffic.

Woods says that there is no one-size-fits-all solution to improve participant education, but SageView tries to offer something for everyone, be it a new employee entering the workforce or an employee two months away from retirement.

Matt Rafeld, director of financial wellness at the Alera Group Inc., agrees there is no blanket solution for participant education.

“We know that the most effective way to engage participants and drive positive outcomes is to meet them where they are,” he says. “That means being able to customize solutions and pull multiple levers that include technology and active coaching.”

Staffing and Fees

Providing personalized, and often one-on-one, education, however, requires commitment and resources. OneDigital, a large and growing advisory, continues to staff sectors dedicated to participant education, says Chepnik.

“We make sure we have enough resources by market or by the region to handle the traffic that’s coming in,” he says.

With the growing level of engagement in digital one-on-one meetings, SageView has also been growing its team, Wood says. The firm has been hiring new employees to take calls and offer one-on-one coaching.

“It truly varies based upon location, but we do have people that are well-versed in providing their education located throughout the U.S.,” Woods says. “We hire as needed within the field in order to bridge any of those gaps.”

Within the financial wellness suite of solutions, fees are typically paid for at a plan sponsor level, she says. She recommends that plan sponsors pay for the service out of a human resources expense budget. However, if a plan has some type of ERISA budget, a company can also use that to pay for services.

Increasing Engagement

Woods says participant engagement varies greatly across client bases. Some sponsors take a very paternalistic view of their employees, while others take a more hands-off approach.

“Some [plan sponsors] want to offer a financial wellness solution just to check that box,” she says. “We see more [participant] engagement rates from employers who truly take a deep dive within their employees, and you can feel that they want to be heavily engaged. We’ve seen better adoption rates from those employers.”

Christian Mango, executive vice president of retirement plan services at Alera, says he believes the greatest levels of engagement occur when there is a high level of leadership buy-in. The more company leaders understand employees’ financial needs, the more committed they will be to helping staff improve their financial well-being and engage more with their benefits.

“Depending on that level of commitment, we may see engagement rates range from 10% to sometimes north of 50%, and those rates typically climb over time,” Mango says.

The challenge for plan sponsors and advisers is creating a program to meet participants where they are, Mango says. That not only means dealing with the challenge of dispersed and remote workers, but also identifying and responding to how those workers want to engage. 

Chepnik believes organizations need a diverse group of educators that are “different ages, different genders, different walks of life.”

“Younger generations like everything electronic, whereas older generations like things on paper and in person,” Chepnik says. “We have to make sure we’re constantly thinking about whether we have enough in our menu of services that we can address these challenges differently.”

Participant Goals Show Need for Plan Design Improvements

Many participants want to save more and retire at the traditional age, which will require advisers to help with thoughtful plan design.
Special Coverage

When considering the average participant’s current saving situation, there is one clear theme: Their workplace savings plan can do more to support their saving and retirement goals.

In the most recent participant survey from PLANSPONSOR, which, like PLANADVISER, is owned by Institutional Shareholder Services Inc., participants reported a strong desire to leverage workplace savings to fund retirement. But there was also a disconnect between their retirement savings goals and the amount they are putting away to meet them.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Some of the highlights from that report can help inform what plan advisers can focus on to improve plan design.

Goals vs. Reality

Industry reports and surveys continue to highlight many people’s plans for “phased retirement,” in which they continue to work beyond the traditional retirement age, either to keep busy or out of necessity.

In PLANSPONSOR’s participant survey, however, about 50% of workplace savers still expect a more traditional retirement, either with Social Security and retirement savings or based on just their own assets. The reality, however, is that people are living longer, which makes income needs in retirement greater than in the past, says Michael Doshier, senior defined contribution adviser strategist for T. Rowe Price.

Plan advisers and sponsors are aware of this trend, which is why more of them approach plan design with a participant’s full lifecycle in mind, Doshier says.

“Plan sponsors have recognized [the longevity issue] and are considering these strategies of guaranteed target dates or managed accounts or other type of personalized solutions,” Doshier says. “The climbing of the mountain and the descending are inextricably linked.”

For plan advisers, Doshier says, it is important to have a process to evaluate how many participants may be staying in their workplace plans into retirement. That can influence everything from the automatic deferral rate to auto-escalation plans to the investment mix. In addition, if a large number of participants may be using their plans in retirement, considering retirement income-oriented products is important, he says.

“As of now, about 13% of consultants and advisers have already done that, but 33% are interested in adding that in coming years,” he says. “I think that needs to be 100% in coming years, or otherwise you’re facing fiduciary risk.”

Definition of Retirement

Delayed retirement (work until age/health forces retirement)
22.1%
Traditional retirement (age when eligible for Social Security benefits)
36.5%
Modern retirement (save enough to reach true financial independence)
22.8%
Phased retirement (reduce workload at current employer/industry)
9.0%
Semi-retirement (flexible work)
6.9%
Temporary retirement (plan to go back to work later)
2.0%
Unsure
0.8%
Source: PLANSPONSOR 2022 Participant Survey

Income Sources in Retirement

DC plan accounts at current employer
84.0%
DC plan accounts at prior/partner's employer(s)
54.9%
IRAs (Traditional, Roth, or Rollover)
45.8%
Nonqualified plan
23.5%
Real estate equity
26.4%
Any other accounts designated for retirement
26.9%
Social Security
59.6%
Inheritance
29.8%
Traditional pension plan
30.5%
Other
14.0%
Source: PLANSPONSOR 2022 Participant Survey

Expectations for Future Pension/DB Benefits

Currently collecting pension from a current/prior employer
22.2%
Expect to receive accrued pension from current employer
16.6%
Expect to receive accrued pension from prior employer
4.9%
Not expecting
48.6%
Unsure
7.8%
Source: PLANSPONSOR 2022 Participant Survey

Increasing Chances of Success

Plan design is the main area in which advisers bring significant value to retirement outcomes, as investment mix options tend to be strong, says Craig Stanley, a lead partner of retirement plan consulting at Summit Group 401(k) Consulting, an Alera Group company.

Advisers can also guide toward quality personalization options if a participant will engage in them, but “human inertia” will often win out, causing many participants simply to stay in their plans in retirement, Stanley says.

“There’s just a general element of human inertia that’s never going to go away,” Stanley says. “We look to design great plans where those terminated employees feel comfortable and confident staying in it and can continue to use it [if they do not roll out to work with a financial adviser].”

As the results showed, employee matching is the most common tool used to try and encourage participants to save, available to almost 70% of participants. Yet most participants reported saving less than 5% of their paycheck (50.7%), and many (37.5%) opted for the automatic default rate, rather putting in additional funds.

Those statistics show there is certainly room for more savings, some of which may be done through plan design, re-enrollment programs and participant education campaigns.

Employer Contributions to DC Plan Accounts

Match
69.1%
Fixed/profit sharing
15.1%
Both match and fixed
5.9%
No employer contribution
5.7%
Employer contribution suspended
1.4%
Unsure
2.7%
Source: PLANSPONSOR 2022 Participant Survey

Contribution/Saving Rate

50.7%
5.1% – 7.0%
17.6%
7.1% – 10.0%
14.9%
>10%
14.2%
Unsure
2.7%
Source: PLANSPONSOR 2022 Participant Survey

How Current Contribution/Savings Rate Determined

Accepted the default
37.5%
Wanted to receive maximum employer contribution
27.8%
Save maximum allowable by law
11.1%
Targeted a specific level of savings
11.5%
Received advice from spouse/friend/adviser
3.9%
Automatically increased to the current level
3.0%
Unsure
5.3%
Source: PLANSPONSOR 2022 Participant Survey

Wellness Needed

Plan adviser Stanley says, despite the element of natural inertia, there is a call by plan sponsors for more personalized retirement services for participants than in the past. Much of the push is geared toward people with smaller balances that “can’t afford or do not need a high level of sophistication outside of a plan. It’s really just trying to provide more to them so that they feel comfortable and confident.”

A key to this financial education, he says, is helping participants match their goals to their needs. Goals will naturally influence how much should be set aside, the types of investment made and, ultimately, what system is used to access retirement funds.

“It’s not necessarily a matter of what [a participant’s] balance is, as much as: How is that money going to play a role in their retirement?” Stanley says. “Is it going to be money that they absolutely need every month to live off of to supplement their income, or is it the gravy on top for travel or the extra things that they want to do that aren’t critical for retirement?”

According to PLANSPONSOR’s survey, less than half (44%) of people live paycheck-to-paycheck. That said, many (41%) are paying off credit card debt monthly or can cover a one-time, unexpected expense of $500 (32%).

On a positive note, the large majority of participants (81%) reported finding financial wellness tools either extremely helpful or helpful. As 41.6% reported not having access to financial programs from their employer at the time of surveying, there is room for improvement that plan advisers and sponsors can help facilitate.

Household Current Financial Situation

Living "paycheck to paycheck"
43.4%
Credit card balances paid in full each month
40.7%
Formal budget for household spending
29.3%
Can cover a one-time unexpected $500 expense
31.9%
Home owner
42.9%
Paying off student debt/loans
15.6%
Rent an apartment/home
18.2%
Saving for college
15.6%
Source: PLANSPONSOR 2022 Participant Survey

Employer Offering Financial Literacy/Wellness Program

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't know / Unsure
Source: PLANSPONSOR 2022 Participant Survey

Helpfulness of Financial Literacy/Wellness Program in Improving Financial Status and Reducing Financial Stress

Extremely helpful
43.5%
Very helpful
37.3%
Somewhat helpful
15.2%
Slightly helpful
2.9%
Not at all helpful
1.1%
Source: PLANSPONSOR 2022 Participant Survey

Preferred Communication Vehicles

Short brochure summarizing 3-5 actionable steps mailed to your home
15.1%
Participate in a 90-minute, instructor-led group seminar
13.6%
Review a periodic newsletter via email
14.7%
Browse an interactive, online library that allows for self-paced learning
14.9%
Meet one-on-one with a financial adviser for 30 minutes
28.9%
Listen to an informative 30-minute podcast
12.8%
Source: PLANSPONSOR 2022 Participant Survey

PLANSPONSOR’s ninth annual participant survey was done in partnership with first-party data company Dynata. It was fielded through the Qualtrics online survey platform from September 29 through October 13, 2022 and included 774 full- and part-time employees who currently participate in an employer-sponsored DC plan and provided information about their current savings vehicles, household financial situation, retirement expectations and goals and benefits and financial wellness programs available through their job.

«