Inflation Pressures and Real Estate Opportunities

Market experts say historically low interest rates, coupled with rising inflation, are currently supportive of real estate asset class valuations, creating a “sweet spot” for investment in core real estate.
PA-012721-OSC 1 Alternatives illustrations_Melinda Beck-web

Art by Melinda Beck

Fueled by historic levels of fiscal stimulus and loose monetary policy, inflation has surged at its fastest 12-month pace since June 1982—rising to 7% in December, according to the Department of Labor (DOL). As more investors seek protection from the threat of rising interest rates, they are increasingly focused on both real estate and real estate investment trusts (REITs) as alternative return sources.

With a constantly shifting investing environment, real estate is experiencing a dramatic revival, according to J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s most recent “Global Real Estate Outlook” report. In the coming 12 to 18 months, the firm expects to see real estate continue to deliver strong risk-adjusted returns, with a meaningful inflation protection element in a rising rate environment—as long as economic growth continues unabated.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

Historically low interest rates coupled with rising inflation are currently supportive of the asset class’s valuations, creating a “sweet spot” for investments in core real estate, the outlook notes. Since the economic recovery began in late 2020, there has been unprecedented fundraising by non-traded private REITs and an acceleration of institutional portfolio rebalancing. As investors come under increasing pressure to find yield-producing assets, J.P. Morgan says it expects to see capital flows into real estate increase sharply.

According to the Defined Contribution Real Estate Council (DCREC)’s “2021 Defined Contribution Survey,” there is rising interest in investing in real estate among defined contribution (DC) investors, with the median assets under management (AUM) of an investment manager managing dedicated DC real estate strategies increasing more than 50% over the past five years, and overall AUM increasing 24%.

Almost half of real estate investment managers responding to the survey are actively managing DC capital within their real estate portfolios. Another 47% of managers are considering or actively developing offerings for the DC market, suggesting the scale of interest in the DC channel is growing every year.

In the current market environment, investors are worried about whether returns for equities and fixed income will be enough for DC savers and how they can include further diversifiers that will be beneficial in the long term, says DCREC co-president Sara Shean. With more plan customization options available, investors are also paying attention to what is structured in a way that can be easily added into a multi-asset portfolio.

The top reasons investors have shown interest in adding private real estate to their plans were diversification, risk-adjusted returns, inflation and downside protection, Shean says. Private real estate investments tend to hold up well when the market is more volatile. Since they move more slowly than the rest of the market, they don’t fluctuate as much either on the downside or upside and can help to “buffer the ride” in the typical portfolio, she explains.

Additionally, Shean says, there have been great strides by the industry over the past 10 years to standardize many of the operating principles and mechanics to help make offering private real estate more attractive vehicles for the DC market.

Interest within the industry has shown that investors want to be able to add real estate to custom target-date, off the shelf target-date or balanced funds, Shean says. There is typically a combination of both public and private real estate offered together in the DC space for multi-asset portfolios.

In the case of private real estate specifically, because it is an illiquid investment, it’s best to combine it into a multi-asset solution that has liquidity from other options within the fund, Shean says. This buffers the participants from periods where they need liquidity to make transactions.

“Private real estate sits right between fixed income and equity. So it gives you the benefit of income, like fixed income, and it also gives you more upside than fixed income,” Shean says. “It sort of sits right in between there and it’s a very steady ride.”

On a standalone basis for DC plan investors, REITs would work best and are beneficial because they are fully liquid and an efficient way to access commercial real estate markets, Shean says. Since REITS are traded and priced daily, they fluctuate more but tend to outperform private real estate by a small margin in the long term. REITs can also be offered in multi-asset solutions and, in some cases, they pair well with private real estate, which can help when the market is more volatile.

When investors use REITs, they are investing in office property, apartments or self-storage, which are all business- and economy-driven. REITs are not the same as owning a home or townhouse, a common misconception, Shean notes.

Additionally, according to J.P. Morgan, historical performance supports the argument for using REITs for their inflation-hedging and income-generating properties. In 83% of the rising rate periods between 1992 and 2020, U.S. REITs delivered positive total returns, and in 50% of those periods, U.S. REITs also outperformed the S&P 500.

As long as the supply-demand dynamic remains healthy—and the economic rebound is not derailed by new coronavirus variants or undermined by poorly controlled inflation in the coming 12 to 18 months—real estate should provide investors with a consistent source of alpha, income and diversification, J.P. Morgan says.

Retirement Income and Alternative Investments

Every level of private equity investment modeled by EBRI resulted in additional 401(k) participants being able to retire at age 65 without running short of money in retirement.
PA-012721-OSC 4 Alternatives illustrations_Melinda Beck-web

Art by Melinda Beck

Swapping target-date fund (TDF) equity allocations for private equity investments in defined contribution (DC) retirement plans resulted in more participants being able to retire at age 65 without running short of money in retirement, according to new research from the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI). 

Jack VanDerhei, director of research at EBRI, examined the impacts of replacing TDF equity allocations with 5%, 10% or 15% allocations to private equity in a research paper, “The Impact of Adding Private Equity to 401(k) Plans on Retirement Income Adequacy.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

“We found that every level of private equity modeled resulted in additional 401(k) participants (who are currently ages 35 to 64) being able to retire at age 65 without running short of money in retirement,” the paper states.

EBRI used its Retirement Security Projection Model (RSPM) to estimate that the total retirement deficit for all U.S. households between the ages of 35 and 64 was $3.68 trillion in 2020. The study noted that not every U.S. worker has access to an employer-sponsored DC plan, despite several legislative efforts to increase access, including the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act of 2019, and the push for additional legislation to build on those policies.

For example, EBRI says, the SECURE Act’s provisions to expand access to employer-sponsored DC plans were estimated to reduce this deficit by $114.9 billion.

But, aside from expanding worker access to DC plans, another approach to improving retirement readiness is to boost expected investment returns. To determine how to improve such returns, EBRI examined the impact on participants’ retirement readiness with greater allocations to better-performing investments and the attendant impact to EBRI’s Retirement Savings Shortfalls (RSS), which calculates the present value of the simulated retirement deficits at retirement age.

“When 15% of the equity in the TDFs is assumed to be replaced with private equity, the RSS reduction varies from 4.8% for the youngest cohort to 2.1% for the oldest cohort,” the paper states. “The RSS reduction varies from 3.2% for the youngest cohort to 1.5% for the oldest cohort when 10% of the equity in the TDFs is assumed to be replaced with private equity, and it varies from 1.8% for the youngest cohort to 0.8% for the oldest cohort when 5% of the equity in the TDFs is assumed to be replaced with private equity.”

EBRI also used its Retirement Readiness Ratings (RRRs) to estimate the effects of changing allocations to participants’ retirement income and peg the probability that a household will not run short of money in retirement.

“For the youngest cohort (those currently ages 35 to 39) who have the longest period to benefit from the change, the RRR increases by 1.3 percentage points,” the paper states. “This differential decreases with age, and those currently ages 50 to 54 are simulated to have RRR increases of 0.6 percentage points.”

The scenario modeled in this paper would only impact some of the current aggregate retirement deficit, since some households will be simulated never to have a 401(k) plan, and even those who do would need to be simulated to invest in a TDF for this scenario to apply.

Last year, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) published an Information letter about adding private equity investments as a component of asset allocation funds offered as an investment option for participants in DC plans.

The letter stated that a plan fiduciary would not violate the duties of a fiduciary solely by offering a professionally managed asset allocation fund with a private equity component as a designated investment alternative. The letter did not authorize plan sponsors to make private equity investments available for direct investment on standalone basis.

Despite the favorable stance from DOL under then-President Donald Trump, Serge Boccassini, head of institutional global product and strategy at Northern Trust Asset Servicing in Chicago, previously told PLANSPONSOR that plan sponsors in the U.S. might have concerns about including private investments in DC plan fund menus.

The EBRI research was completed before the DOL, now under President Joe Biden’s administration, issued a supplemental statement last month to clarify the 2020 letter. 

The recent DOL supplemental statement cautioned plan fiduciaries against the perception that private equity is generally appropriate as a component of a designated investment alternative in a typical DC plan, in response to stakeholder concerns.

Editor’s note: This article was originally published as ‘Increasing Exposures to Private Equity Boosts Retirement Security’

«