Predictions of Growth and a ‘Status Quo’ Presidential Election

Are earnings estimates too high? Is the trade progress substance or show? How long can a recession be avoided? What might the election mean for the economy?

Continuing an annual tradition, Bob Doll, senior portfolio manager and chief equity strategist at Nuveen, aired his 2020 market predictions during a conference call with reporters.

Doll noted that eight of his 10 predictions for 2019 panned out, though he emphasized that he and others did not foresee the magnitude of growth enjoyed by U.S. markets.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

“For 2019, we had the direction right for the equity market, but we didn’t predict the magnitude of growth,” Doll said. “2019 delivered double the U.S. market return that we expected, fueled by a massive pivot by the Federal Reserve.”

Looking to 2020, Doll said, the U.S. economy is “OK, probably a little better.” He said the most common client questions for the year are as follows: “Are earnings estimates too high? Is the trade deal between China and the United States more substance or show? How long can a recession be avoided? What might the impeachment or the election mean for the economy?”

Doll said he expects U.S. GDP will grow over 2% during 2020, while global GDP growth could top 3%.

“Not the strongest numbers, but it’s a sign of a good economy, and especially improvement outside the U.S.,” Doll noted. “Inflation and interest rates will creep higher, to potentially 2% to 2.5% for both.”

Doll argued there will be no cheap asset classes in 2020. Bonds are fairly expensive. Stock valuations are fairly high relative to history.

“Non-U.S. stocks could outpace U.S. stocks,” Doll posited. “That prediction has been made, wrongly, for some years now. Last year, we predicted that shift for the first time, and got it wrong—but we are repeating the prediction for 2020. The U.S. dollar must weaken for this prediction to come true.”

Sector-wise, Doll said, financials will be attractive, even after improvements in price late last year, in part because bank balance sheets are strong and improving. Tech stocks will be attractive but volatile, and health care stocks may outperform as well.

Another notable prediction Doll made was that the majority of active managers will outperform their index for the first time in a decade. He pointed to various factors supporting this hypothesis, for example the improved outlook for small cap stocks and the rosier conditions in emerging markets.

Stepping back from the markets, Doll offered some detailed predictions about what may happen in the 2020 federal elections—including the race for President.

“I believe we will see a status quo election, meaning the reelection of President Trump, Democrats holding the House and Republicans controlling the Senate,” Doll said. “This is simply a historic call, rather than being based on some special insight. When an incumbent U.S. President is running for reelection and there is no recession and no strong opposition within his own party, that candidate has basically always won, historically. This time could be different, of course, and the polls will be all over the place leading up to the election.”

Lessons from 2019

In separate commentary shared with PLANADVISER, John Lynch, chief investment strategist, LPL Financial, said 2019 was a difficult one to forecast, after 2018 ended with the worst December since the Great Depression. 

“While our positive stock market outlook proved too conservative, we are pleased to report we got more right than wrong for 2019,” Lynch said. “Now we know our 3,000 target [for the S&P 500] was overly conservative. We ended up taking risk down by reducing our equities allocation recommendation from overweight to market weight in March and April 2019. In retrospect, staying aggressive would have captured additional upside in model portfolios. Nonetheless, we consider maintaining a market-weight equities allocation since March as stocks surged a victory.”

Lynch pointed out that, “though the path on trade was longer and bumpier than anticipated,” the large cap Russell 1000 Index has outperformed the small cap Russell 2000 Index by a substantial margin. Furthermore, favoring the most economically sensitive, or cyclical sectors, worked in 2019, Lynch said, particularly technology, which so far has topped all S&P 500 sectors.

The next-best performers—communication services, financials, and industrials—also are cyclical and have each posted 2019 returns near 30%.

“Not favoring 2019’s worst performing sector—energy—was also helpful, though we did maintain limited exposure to underperforming but higher-yielding master limited partnerships in income-oriented portfolios during the year,” Lynch said.

Citing other lessons learned form 2019, Lynch said trade tensions escalated further and lasted longer than his firm had anticipated, “which put emerging markets in the miss column—although the 18% year-to-date return is certainly respectable.”

“Although this was clearly a miss, credit-sensitive positioning of our fixed-income allocations within portfolios was beneficial and provided an offset to our decision to emphasize short- and intermediate-term rather than long-term bonds,” Lynch concluded.

Judge Dismisses Charles Schwab Antitrust Lawsuit on Technical Issue

Corporate entities, such as the advisory firm suing to halt the Charles Schwab/TD Ameritrade merger on antitrust grounds, must be represented by qualified counsel.

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has dismissed on procedural grounds an antitrust lawsuit filed to stop the merger of Charles Schwab and TD Ameritrade.

In November 2019, the Charles Schwab Corporation and TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation announced their entrance into a definitive agreement for Schwab to acquire TD Ameritrade in an all-stock transaction. At the beginning of 2020, BlackCrown Inc., an independent Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registered wealth management firm, filed a civil antitrust action to prevent the combination of Charles Schwab and TD Ameritrade.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

In a quickly issued and brief ruling, the New York District Court has dismissed the action “sua sponte” and without prejudice, because the plaintiff BlackCrown Inc. is not represented by counsel.

“Corporate entities—such as BlackCrown Inc.—must appear before the Court through counsel,” the dismissal decision states, citing a 1993 case Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, and a 1997 decision in Pridgen v. Anresen.

“It is well established that a layperson may not represent a corporation,” the decision says. “In other words, BlackCrown Inc. must retain an attorney should it wish to prosecute this case. Because BlackCrown Inc. has attempted to proceed with this action pro se, it must be dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.”

The complaint, now dismissed but free to be refiled, argues that the secession of competition between TD Ameritrade and Charles Schwab will harm consumers and independent financial advisers—particularly those with less than $200 million in client assets. According to BlackCrown, TD Ameritrade’s custodian services and technology are the only competitive alternatives to Charles Schwab for independent wealth management firms with smaller assets under management.

«