Complying With ‘FAIR Act,’ SEC Eases Fund Research Distribution Restrictions

The SEC says these changes are needed to reduce obstacles to providing research on investment funds, and to harmonize the treatment of such research with research on other public companies.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted rules and amendments designed to promote easier sharing of research on mutual funds, exchange‑traded funds, registered closed-end funds, business development companies, and similar covered investment funds.

According to SEC Chairman Jay Clayton, the changes reduce obstacles to providing research on investment funds by harmonizing the treatment of such research with research on other public companies. He adds that the Commission took this action “in furtherance of the mandate in the Fair Access to Investment Research Act of 2017 (FAIR Act).”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

“These rules will promote greater access to research for investors in funds,” Clayton says. “Our response to this legislation is crafted to facilitate more informed decisions, which in turn should improve the quality of a market that has become important to our Main Street investors.”

The rules and amendments “generally establish a safe harbor for a broker or dealer to publish or distribute research reports on investment funds under certain conditions.” According to an SEC synopsis, this safe harbor is established by the new Rule 139b and is “similar to a regulatory safe harbor that currently exists for research reports about public companies.”  

Under the final rule, if certain conditions for the safe harbor are satisfied, the publication or distribution of fund research in itself would be deemed not to be an offer for sale or offer to sell the covered investment fund’s securities for purposes of Sections 2(a)(10) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933.

With respect to the Investment Company Act of 1940, SEC will now exclude a covered investment fund research report from the coverage of Section 24(b) of the Investment Company Act (or the rules and regulations thereunder), “except to the extent the research report is otherwise not subject to the content standards in self-regulatory organization rules related to research reports, including those contained in the rules governing communications with the public regarding investment companies or substantially similar standards.”

Another rule amendment made final by SEC would “permit distribution participants, such as brokers or dealers, to publish or disseminate any information, opinion, or recommendation relating to a covered security if the conditions of Rule 139b (or, alternatively, the conditions of Rule 1388 or Rule 139 under the Securities Act) are satisfied.” According to the SEC, this proposed conforming amendment is intended to align the treatment of research under proposed Rule 139b with the treatment of research under Rules 138 and 139 for purposes of Regulation M.

Attorneys Report Settlement in Duke University 403(b) Plan Cases

One case focused on excessive fees for recordkeeping, administrative, and investment services, and the other focused on revenue sharing.

A case accusing fiduciaries of the Duke Faculty and Staff Retirement Plan of causing the plan to pay unreasonable and greatly excessive fees for recordkeeping, administrative, and investment services has been reported settled by the university’s counsel as well as the plaintiffs’ counsel.

Likewise, the docket report for a second complaint against Duke University—this one focusing on revenue sharing it took but didn’t deliver for distribution to plan participants—says the parties have settled. A stipulation of dismissal for both lawsuits was due by December 2, but neither has been filed yet.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

No details of a settlement have been reported to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.

Higher education institution 403(b) plans have been the target of Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) litigation in the past two years. In the first to go to trial, a lawsuit alleging imprudence in the management of two New York University (NYU) 403(b) plans was decided in favor of the university, although the judge did find some concerning lack of knowledge among some plan committee members.

In other similar lawsuits, universities’ motions for dismissal have been approved.

«