Plan Sponsors Make More Changes

A survey by the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans (IFEBP) found defined contribution sponsors are making plan changes in the face of the economic downturn.

An IFEBP news release said 13% of DC plan sponsors have changed their investment product offerings as a result of the crisis—almost double the 7% who reported doing so six months earlier. Of the 13% who have implemented changes, 21% added more low-risk investment choices, 18% increased diversification, 16% added lifecycle (target-date) funds or money market funds, and 15% added government-backed options.

The poll found 16% of DC plan sponsors reduced or eliminated employer matches as a result of the economic situation. Of those who report having changed their match, 44% have reduced the amount of the match and 52% have suspended the match all together. Corporations are the most likely to have taken this action, IFEBP said.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Forty-four percent of DC sponsors report a decrease in participants’ overall amount of contributions—representing a sharp uptick since October when just 28% of plan sponsors reported this trend. Even more notable, 40% of DC sponsors report an increase in the number of participants stopping plan contributions altogether.

DB Plans

Defined benefit (DB) sponsors are also making changes. IFEBP found 42% of DB plan sponsors changed their strategic asset allocation—more than double the 20% who reported having done so in a poll six months earlier. The most common changes are increasing fixed-income assets (37%), reducing U.S. equity allocations (17%), and increasing alternative fund investments (13%).

DB sponsors are also taking another look at offering a pension plan at all. Some 27% have discontinued offering pension benefits for all or some employees, and 21% have closed their plan to new participants, the survey found.

“Six months ago, many retirement plan sponsors reported they were ‘taking the long view’ of the situation,” said Sally Natchek, senior director of research at the International Foundation, in the news release. “Now, employers seem to view the crisis as more severe. There’s been a jump in the number making changes to their offerings, categories of employees covered, asset allocations, and employer matches.”

Hardship Withdrawals

Hardship withdrawals and loans from DC plans are also on the rise, with 42% of plan sponsors reporting an increase in the number of participants making hardship withdrawals and 40% reporting an increase in those borrowing from retirement accounts, the IFEBP survey found.

That is in contrast to six months ago, when 29% of plans sponsors reported an increase in hardship withdrawals and 28% indicated an increase in loans.

The survey included responses from 1,305 U.S. pension plan sponsors of corporate plans, public and governmental plans, multiemployer plans, and others.


Pension Plans: Impact of the Financial Crisis, May 2009 can be purchased by nonmembers for $50 here.

 

Provider Offers Custom Asset Allocation Portfolios

McCready and Keene announced it offers custom risk-based and age-based portfolios within the same retirement plan, utilizing an asset allocation strategy composed of a plan's core fund lineup.

According to a news release from the company, the offering is complemented by providing participants access to a risk-based questionnaire, which will guide them to their proper portfolio based on a scoring system.

As an open-architecture provider, the firm said it is able to meet the demands of advisers and financial service professionals regardless of their compensation arrangements (fee-for-service, flat fee, wrap fee, commission-based, etcetera). In addition, as an independent full-service recordkeeping provider, the firm does not offer investments, allowing advisers to design and offer custom portfolios to their clients without proprietary requirements, the company said.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

McCready and Keene suggested that risk-based portfolios provide participants with an asset allocation model that remains in effect until the participant elects to make a change if their risk tolerance has changed; while age-based portfolios can be set up by the adviser and plan sponsor as the plan’s default investment and will automatically move participants to their proper asset allocation based on age.


 

 

More information is available at www.mcak.com.

 

«