Advice on Equity Compensation Can Increase Retirement Security

Employees who receive equity compensation advice feel much more confident about retirement than those who have not received help from a financial adviser, a survey finds.

UBS Wealth Management Americas’ third edition of UBS Participant Voice, an industry wide survey of equity plan participants, called “The multiplier effect,” found 45% of employees see little value in equity awards, even though companies grant billions in equity awards each year.

However, when employees take three specific actions—planning, advice and diversification—they perceive twice as much value in their equity compensation. Among participants who took none of these actions, only 36% are confident that they will achieve their financial goals.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Sixty-nine percent of employees who incorporate equity awards into their financial plans feel confident about achieving their financial goals versus 43% of those without a plan. Similarly, 61% of employees who receive equity compensation advice feel highly confident about retirement versus 41% who have not received help from a financial adviser.

Employees see the most value in advice on diversification strategies, managing the risks of concentrated positions and setting a target price for selling shares.

More information from the survey is here.

GAO Gives DOL Recommendations to Encourage Lifetime Income Options in 401(k)s

In a report, the GAO notes that concerns about legal risks and recordkeeper constraints may deter many 401(k) plan sponsors from offering lifetime income options in their plans.

A Government Accountability Office (GAO) questionnaire from 11 401(k) plan recordkeepers showed that most plans covered by the questionnaire had not adopted products and services that could  help participants turn their savings into a retirement income stream. 

GAO noted that responses to the questionnaire represented more than 40% of all 401(k) assets and about one-quarter of plans at the end of 2014. GAO found that of the plans covered by the questionnaire, about two-thirds did not offer a systematic withdrawal option—payments from accounts, sometimes designed to last a lifetime—and about three-quarters did not offer an annuity.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Concerns about legal risks and recordkeeper constraints may deter many plan sponsors from offering lifetime income options. The GAO pointed out that the Department of Labor (DOL) has prescribed steps plan sponsors can take to satisfy their fiduciary duties when selecting an annuity provider for a 401(k) plan. However, according to industry stakeholders GAO interviewed, those steps are not often used because they include assessing “sufficient” information to “appropriately” conclude that the annuity provider will be financially able to pay future claims, without providing clear definitions for those terms.

Further, GAO found that a mix of lifetime income options to choose from is not usually available. The DOL provides an incentive in the form of limited liability relief to plan sponsors who, among other things, provide participants at least three diversified investment options. However, no such incentive exists for plan sponsors offering a mix of lifetime income options. Without some degree of liability relief, plan sponsors may be reluctant to offer a diverse mix of lifetime income options to their participants.

Stakeholders also told GAO that recordkeepers may make only their own annuities available to the plans they service. The DOL provides guidance on selecting service providers, but it does not encourage plan sponsors to seek choices from their service providers, which may prevent plans from having appropriate annuity options available to offer participants.

The DOL’s guidance on default lifetime income is focused on a particular annuity type used only by a few plans. By issuing guidance encouraging plans to consider letting required minimum distributions (RMDs) be the default distribution process for retiring participants, the DOL may help create lifetime income for participants who do not choose an option, the GAO said.

GAO made seven recommendations to the DOL, including that it clarify the criteria to be used by plan sponsors to select an annuity provider; consider providing limited liability relief for offering an appropriate mix of lifetime income options; issue guidance to encourage plan sponsors to select a recordkeeper that offers annuities from other providers; and consider providing RMD-based default lifetime income to retirees. The DOL generally agreed to the recommendations and told the GAO it would take actions to address them.

The GAO report may be downloaded from here.

«