Higher Education 403(b)s An Opportunity for Advisers

As 403(b) plans continue to evolve, there are still ample opportunities for plan advisers to help plan sponsors improve their plans and processes.

The fifth annual 403(b) plan survey, from the Plan Sponsor Council of America (PSCA) and sponsored by the Principal Financial Group, found 403(b) plan sponsors continue to make changes to improve the value of their plans and the retirement readiness of participants (see “403(b) Sponsors Continue to Improve Plan Value”). But, the data points to several areas that could improve.  

For example, the survey found higher education institutions on average make 65 funds available for participant contributions, two to three times higher than other industries in the survey. Aaron Friedman, national nonprofit practice leader at The Principal, noted that nearly half (47.9%) of these institutions still use more than one provider, and for 40% of them, it’s been at least five years since their last request for proposals (RFP). He thinks the problem is “historical.”   

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

“What happens is there are personnel coming into higher education institutions that may have already [gone] through a 403(b) plan consolidation, and they want that, but existing staff have ‘pet’ investments or providers,” Friedman told PLANSPONSOR. However, institutions are beginning to see that having fewer choices is better for participant outcomes.

“Plan sponsors should work with the responsible parties at higher education institutions to convince them of behavioral and administrative advantages,” he suggested, adding that advisers must be diligent in working with the appropriate people and not expect it to be easy. “It is an evolution and will take some time,” he said.  

In addition, advisers can use the survey to help clients benchmark their plans, and “to demonstrate that other 403(b) plan sponsors use half the number of investments,” Friedman recommended.  

Other survey findings that indicate opportunities for advisers in the 403(b) market in general include: 

  • 34.3% of organizations offer more than one type of retirement plan to essentially the same group of employees; 
  • Plans offer an average of 27 funds for organization contributions and an average of 31 funds for participant contributions; 
  • 24.1% are unsure if their plan has an investment policy statement; 
  • 46% of organizations retain an independent investment adviser to assist with fiduciary responsibility; 
  • 24.4% of organizations offer investment advice to participants;  
  • 15.7% of organizations are re-evaluating the allocation of plan-related expenses; and
  • 1.9% of plans state that they never review fees. 

Rollovers Rule the IRA Roost

Roth individual retirement accounts (IRAs) get the most contributions, and IRAs funded by rollovers hold the most money, the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) found.

Of the new contributions, most go into Roth IRAs, but most of the assets are held in traditional IRAs, where the money originated from a rollover from other tax-qualified retirement plans (such as 401(k) plans) and not from new contributions, according to research by EBRI.

The latest report from the EBRI IRA Database finds that 26% of Roth IRA owners contributed to their accounts in 2011, compared with just 6% of traditional IRA owners. For traditional and Roth IRAs combined, 13% received contributions that year.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The data also shows that individuals with a traditional IRA originating from rollovers had the highest average and median balances ($110,920 and $31,940, respectively). Roth owners had lower average and median balances, at $25,230 and $11,340.

And in the 2011 EBRI IRA Database, rollovers to IRAs contributed almost 13 times the dollar amount of new contributions that went into the accounts. IRAs hold more than 25% of all retirement assets in the U.S., making them a vital component of the nation’s retirement savings.

Overall, the total average IRA account balance in 2011 was $71,900, while the average IRA individual balance (all accounts from the same person combined, since many individuals own more than one IRA) was $87,670. The median account balance was $19,620, and the median individual balance was $23,785.

The EBRI IRA Database is unique in its ability to track people who own multiple IRAs, providing a measure of people’s consolidated IRA holdings. For instance, it shows that the overall cumulative IRA average balance was 24% larger than the unique account balance, providing a far more accurate picture of the assets held in these accounts. 

“The results show the importance of being able to measure an individual’s combined account balances to determine the potential total retirement savings he or she has by the aggregation of multiple accounts,” said Craig Copeland, EBRI senior research associate and author of the report.  

The EBRI IRA Database contains data collected from various IRA plan administrators on 20.5 million accounts owned by 16.6 million unique individuals with total assets of $1.456 trillion. EBRI is building a database that will allow it to track the flow of retirement assets saved in 401(k) plans and other tax-qualified plans and transferred to IRAs and spent in retirement as people leave the work force.

Among the other findings in the EBRI IRA report:

  • Males had higher individual average and median balances than females: $114,745 and $30,704 for males, respectively, vs. $66,529 and $21,642 for females. The median balance for males reached $72,971 for those ages 70 or older, compared with $42,926 for females of that age.
  •  Of those individuals contributing, 47% contributed the maximum amount. Just over one-half (51%) of those contributing to a traditional IRA contributed the maximum, while 44% did so with a Roth IRA.
  • While more than 1.6 million accounts received contributions and approximately 1.1 million accounts received rollovers in 2011 in the database, almost 13 times the amount of dollars were added to IRAs through rollovers than from contributions.
  • More contributions were made to Roth accounts than to traditional IRAs in the database. However, at $3,879, the average contribution to a traditional account was higher than the $3,633 average contribution to a Roth account. Yet, a higher overall aggregate amount was contributed to Roth IRAs ($3.7 billion for Roths compared with $2.3 billion for traditional accounts).
  • Roth IRAs had a higher percentage of younger individuals contribute to them than did traditional IRAs, as 24% of the Roth accounts receiving contributions were owned by individuals ages 25 to 34, compared with 9% for traditional IRAs.
  • The EBRI IRA Database can track consistent contributors. Those who contributed one year were far more likely to contribute the next year, the data found. Among traditional and Roth IRA owners, 7% made contributions in both 2010 and 2011, and of those who contributed in 2010, 65% contributed again in 2011. Roth IRA owners were both more likely to contribute to their IRA and more likely to contribute to the IRA in subsequent years: 17% of Roth IRA owners contributed to their IRA in both years, compared with 3.2% of traditional IRA owners. With Roth IRAs, younger owners (over the age of 25 up to age 50) had higher persistence rates in contributing in both 2010 and 2011) than those 50 or older. With traditional IRAs, persistence rates increased with age through age 49, and then started to decline through age 70 or older.

Full details of the report are available online at www.ebri.org, in the May 2013 EBRI Issue Brief, “Individual Retirement Account Balances, Contributions, and Rollovers, 2011: The EBRI IRA Database.”

«