Funds Take in $26B in October

Investors contributed $26.8 billion to long-term mutual funds in October, about twice the previous month's tally, according to the latest Morningstar fund flow data.

A Morningstar news release said the difference is owed to a slower pace of U.S. equity redemptions and one big distortion in international stock flows.

According to Morningstar, outside of U.S. equities, every asset class had positive inflows. International-stock funds had their best month since April, although this owed primarily to continued strong flows into diversified emerging-markets equity funds.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

Balanced funds also turned in their best month since April, with $2.3 billion in positive flows, according to the data. As has been the recent trend, investors embraced the two poles within the group–world-allocation and conservative-allocation funds. BlackRock Global Allocation led the world-allocation category with nearly $1 billion in inflows.

Demand for taxable-bond funds remains steady with $20.6 billion in contributions. According to the data, intermediate-term bond funds continued to lead the way, with $5.6 billion in inflows, but short-term bond funds have been supplanted in the rankings by world-bond and multisector bond funds, which absorbed $3.7 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively.

Ebbing Muni Bond  Interest  

On the other hand, investor enthusiasm appears to be ebbing for municipal-bond funds. While this group took in $1.8 billion in October, inflows have been declining since September 2009. This could be considered somewhat surprising, given the possibility of higher tax rates in the future, but it may also owe to concerns over municipal finances.

The pace of U.S. equity fund redemptions declined significantly in October to $6.3 billion from $18.3 billion the previous month. In fact, this past month’s outflows were the smallest since May’s flash crash. But this still marks the sixth consecutive month of outflows, despite a powerful recent U.S. equity rally, Morningstar said. .

Nevertheless, investor aversion to U.S. equities remains, as $64.2 billion has now left these funds in 2010. However, passively managed funds remain popular, enjoying inflows of $2.2 billion versus $8.5 billion in outflows for actively managed funds. While investors are embracing risks in other parts of the market, U.S. equity manager risk is not one of them, Morningstar commented.

For those leaving U.S. equities, large-cap funds continued to be a favorite source of liquidity. The three major large-cap categories accounted for the vast majority of outflows, a combined $6.7 billion, Morningstar said. As occurred last month, large-growth funds endured the worst of it. This category’s $7.3 billion in September outflows was more than the combined redemptions in the large-value and large-growth categories. Although the absolute level of outflows fell in October, the trend was even more acute, as the $4.3 billion that fled large-growth funds was almost twice the combined $23 billion that left the large-value and large-blend categories.

Outside of the United States, demand for emerging-market equities remains strong with $2.3 billion in October inflows. However, that understates their increasing popularity. Vanguard announced in late September that it would replace Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index, Vanguard European Stock Index, and Vanguard Pacific Stock Index with Vanguard Total International Stock Index in its target-date lineup and with three funds-of-funds.

Morningstar said this led to significant swings within the international stock asset class. Vanguard Total International Stock Index gained $10.7 billion in flows last month versus $2.5 billion in outflows for Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index.  

As yields have fallen in recent years, investors have become bolder. However, rather than go farther out on the yield curve, they have instead gone down the credit ladder. Inflows into long-term bond funds of all stripes remain fairly tepid. On the other hand, within both the taxable- and municipal-bond universes, this quest for yield has come at the expense of short-term bond funds.

Advisers Have Untapped Opportunities with Gen X/Y

More than one-third of Generation X and Y (Gen X/Y) investors surveyed by MFS Investment Management say their need for advice has increased since the downturn.

The study showed that when compared with their older peers, Gen X/Y are more likely to express an unmet need in all areas of an advised relationship – particularly for portfolio management and account review/rebalancing.   

According to a press release, perceived cost is the main barrier to obtaining financial adviser services. When asked why they do not have an adviser, 53% of Gen X/Y said it is not worth it or did not want to pay for it.   

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

A third of survey respondents said they do not need an adviser (they do it themselves or use friend/family member); 22% cited a lack of trust; 28% said they do not have enough assets to warrant an adviser; 10% do not know how to go about finding an adviser; and 12% reported never being contacted by an adviser.   

“Considering the median household investable assets of Gen X/Y surveyed was $260,000, their responses about financial advice are staggering – a significant portion of a large demographic group with considerable assets to invest does not understand the value proposition of an adviser,” said Bill Finnegan, director of Global Retail Marketing for MFS, in the press release. “Advisers need to consider what motivates younger investors and how they prefer to do business and then develop new strategies to engage them. Failing to engage with Gen X/Y now potentially limits advisers’ ability to sustain and grow their practices and may damage Gen X/Y’s ability to establish both strong investing and saving habits as well as long-term plans for life’s goals.”  

MFS surveyed investors with at least $100,000 to invest and asked them to compare their attitudes and behaviors about investing today with those before the recent economic downturn and recession.

«