Taking the Pulse of Top-Performing DC Advisers

The strongest-performing advisers are leading the way on aggressive plan design, embracing re-enrollment, stretching the match and making sure plans work for participants as they’re designed to. 

Each year J.P. Morgan brings together more than 100 of its strongest-performing defined contribution (DC) plan advisers for a DC summit—to hear about what is working on the ground and where improvements can be made from a product and process standpoint.

This year the firm invited PLANADVISER to sit in on the conversation, and to say that there are more than a few items of concern out there right now for plan advisers is a serious understatement. John Galateria, head of the North America institutional business for J.P. Morgan Asset Management, opened the summit by running through a list of 10 themes that will be very familiar to those working every day in the advisory industry—observing that each has a chance of derailing hard-won progress made by advisers and their clients in recent years, but also of shaping and propelling new advances. 

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

“On the list of top priorities right now are fees, litigation, core menu simplification, the benefits of white labeling, target-date fund (TDF) glide path evaluation, unbundling of large plans for more transparency, alternatives in defined contribution plans, retirement income security, the growth/transfer of wealth to the Millennial generation, and the power of auto-features and re-enrollments,” Galateria said. “These are the issues our advisers tell us they are tackling on the ground and discussing with plan sponsors and other providers every day—and they are also a very big focus here in the home office.”

Adding an 11th item to the list of potential disruptors, Galateria later cited the ongoing efforts by more than half of state governments to introduce mandatory workplace savings schemes. “With so much disruption to overcome, it’s increasingly becoming clear that bold thinking and courageous action on the part of advisers are needed to protect the progress we have made and to push the industry to the next level of performance,” Galateria noted. “It’s up to the folks in this room right now to solve the retirement challenges our nation faces. We know that the we can’t leave it up to individual investors to do it themselves, nor can we wait for the government to step in with solutions that are going to be effective.”

Echoing the sentiment of many in the room, Galateria noted that all of these factors present a real risk of slowing or halting the progress the industry has made in the 10 years since the ratification of the Pension Protection Act (PPA). “We have heard clearly from all the advisers here today that their plan sponsor clients are really laser-focused on their litigation risk under ERISA,” he said. “Many are holding off on moves they feel would be the right thing to do, simply because they’re confronted with so much perceived litigation risk.”

 NEXT: Optimism abounds as well 

Joining Galateria in opening the summit was Anne Lester, head of retirement solutions for J.P. Morgan's global investment management solutions group. She echoed Galateria’s list of challenges, citing the 10-year anniversary of the PPA and the ongoing rollout of the Department of Labor’s (DOL) new fiduciary regulation as two major milestones for the industry.

She also warned that the wider demographic trends in the United States are quickly and powerfully reshaping the work advisers are called on to do. “There are a few statistics that sum up the demographic trends quite well,” Lester said. “For example, we can see clearly now that by 2030, the U.S. will have more people who are over the age 75 than who are at any other age. In other words, there will be more people over the age of 75 than there are young people in the workforce. It’s going to have a big impact on the U.S. and global economies.”

Lester encouraged advisers in the audience to look to places like Japan for an example of what this will look like: “That country is going through some well-publicized challenges related to having a very top-heavy population. Growth is weaker and the quality of life of older and younger people is being strained due to a lack of income.”

To avoid the same fate in the U.S. may be impossible given how difficult it is for either government or business to shape demographic trends. “But what we in the advisory industry can do is start making sure wealth is being built up among the younger segments of the population,” Galateria observed. “We can’t allow the problem to get worse and worse by allowing Millennials to fall behind on their own savings needs.”

Advisers in the audience agreed—with a few pointing out that their plan sponsor clients are starting to tune into these demographic issues, given that their own workforces are skewing older and older. One even suggested a few clients have started bringing Millennials formally onto the retirement benefits committee, in a clear attempt to be more forward-thinking.

“This is the type of bold action that is going to be invaluable in keeping the industry on track and making sure DC plans work for people in the decades to come,” Galateria concluded. “I’m actually very optimistic that the DC system we are still building out day by day will serve Millennials well, especially if we can impart all of this messaging to them now, while they have the power of time on their side.” 

Funding a Top Focus of DB Plan Sponsors

While they work to fund their plans, however, uncertainties make it more difficult to calculate liabilities and returns over the long term.

A fully funded defined benefit (DB) plan reduces future financial risk to the company sponsoring the plan and enables the consideration of different investment strategies available to maintain full funding, notes a survey report from Prudential.

It can also lay the groundwork for the next stages of DB risk management, such as transferring pension obligations to a third-party insurer.

Want the latest retirement plan adviser news and insights? Sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters.

The survey shows that, while some companies still need to improve just to reach the minimum funded level required by law, others are working towards higher funded ratios. Sixty-four percent of respondents report either that their companies have already increased contributions (15%) or that they are likely to do so within two years (49%).

The issue of funding pension plans has risen to the attention of companies’ leadership. When asked if their board of directors and senior management are focused on the financial risk of their DB plans, four times as many respondents agree (48%) as disagree (12%). The remainder neither agree nor disagree.

However, uncertainties about the timing of interest rate increases, continued volatility in equity markets, and increasing life expectancies make it more difficult to calculate liabilities and returns over the long term. Accordingly, half of the firms in the survey (49%) report that they have modeled future DB contributions based on assumptions of extreme market volatility, while 62% have modeled for increasing longevity.

One way to manage volatility is through the use of liability-driven investing (LDI). Seven out of 10 respondents (71%) report that their companies already invest some portion of their DB plan assets in LDI strategies. Thirty-five percent (35%) of this year’s respondents view LDI as an initial step towards full DB liability transfer, and 32% say their adoption of LDI has significantly reduced DB risk.

NEXT: Preparing for longevity risk

In addition to volatility, longevity risk continues to garner increased attention. The Society of Actuaries has published new mortality tables based on longer life expectancies, with the result that projected liabilities may increase for some companies.

The survey shows that most companies are preparing to account for the increase in life expectancies in their calculations. About six in 10 respondents (61%) say either that they have reviewed participant mortality experience within the past 12 months (46%) or are planning on doing so within the next 12 months (15%).

One option for managing the risk involved with mortality assumptions is longevity insurance. Nearly one-quarter of respondents (23%) believe that these types of transactions could be relevant for their own companies.

However, the largest proportion of respondents (35%) say that they do not yet know enough about the longevity insurance transactions to have an opinion, and an additional 9% are not aware of the transactions at all.

In a recent conversation with PLANSPONSOR, Rohit Mathur, head of Global Product & Market Solutions, Pension & Structured Solutions at Prudential Retirement in Newark, New Jersey, said borrowing to fund is a viable funding strategy for nearly all DB plan sponsors.

Results of the sixth annual survey CFO Research has conducted with Prudential Financial, are based on survey responses of 180 finance executives, most of whom (78%) work at large U.S. companies with more than $1 billion in annual revenues. All of the companies in the survey also have DB plans with more than $250 million in assets; 31% have between $1 billion and $5 billion in assets, and an additional 31% have more than $5 billion in assets.

«