Northern
Trust added client collateral to the categories managed by its Exposure
Analysis tool, to help institutional clients collect complex information at the
fund or plan level.
Exposure Analysis offers institutional investors and asset
managers an understanding of the effect that a single entity has on a fund or
plan as soon as market events occur.
Available on Northern Trust’s Web portal, Passport, the tool
provides information on collateral positions in an entity as well as market
exposure to physical assets and counterparty exposure to over-the-counter
derivative transactions.
“As the market has evolved and clients seek more transparency
[in] their portfolios, our tools have been enhanced to allow our clients to
monitor their exposure to determine how their fund or plan may be impacted,” said
Debra Clayton, product manager for corporate and institutional Services.
Clients worldwide can enter a security identifier or issuer
name via the tool and immediately receive total client collateral positions in
any one entity across asset types and accounts. Exposure Analysis shows clients
their collateral positions through amount, location and status of collateral.
The addition of collateral exposure to market, counterparty and securities
lending positions expands clients’ view of portfolio exposure to help them
ensure that they have effective risk management and compliance oversight
programs in place.
By using this site you agree to our network wide Privacy Policy.
Because of continued market volatility and record-low
interest rates this year, the average funded status of U.S. corporate pensions
dropped 2.9 percentage points in July, to 68.7%—the lowest since 2007. The goal
of the survey was to determine the investment challenges and strategies that
had the greatest impact on pension management in the U.S. and Canada this year.
The future remains uncertain. More than half (55%) of pension plans surveyed are either
closed or frozen, meaning new employees cannot participate, but only 1% of
plans have begun the termination process. An additional 37% said their pension
is 81% to 90% funded; only 11% admitted having a plan that is below 70% funded.
In the U.S., 27% of plans surveyed currently fail to meet the federal funding
minimum of 80%, the poll found.
When asked whether or not they would terminate their plans
if they were fully funded, 44% of respondents said they would terminate the
plan but continue to offer an alternative retirement benefit such as a 401(k),
and 56% said they would not terminate because the pension is too critical a
part of the benefits structure.
U.S. MAP-21 to leave contributions largely unaffected. Less than half (43%) of U.S. respondents believe MAP-21 –
the recent law that changes how liabilities are calculated, potentially
lowering contributions in the immediate future – will be effective, while
almost one-quarter (21%) said it was too early to gauge the impact.
Popularity of alternatives declines in 2012. In previous polls, alternatives in portfolios steadily
increased (78% in 2011). However, this year’s poll saw a slight decline in use
(down to 65%), the same percentage as 2010. This decrease had the greatest
impact on plans with more than $1 billion in assets, which dropped usage by
25%.
(Cont...)
Liability-driven investing and glidepath strategies remain
popular. More than half (52%) of
respondents currently invest a portion of their pension portfolios in
liability-driven investing (LDI) strategies. The largest group (17%) allocates
between 21% and 30%. Furthermore, the survey found that plans that are 71% to
80% funded have the highest use of LDI strategies (63%); those below 70% funded
use LDI strategies the least (29%); and about half (56%) of plans that are 91%
to 100% funded are invested in LDIs.
Regarding glidepath strategies, 40% of survey participants
are either using or currently developing one.
The biggest investment challenge of 2012. The low interest rate environment of the U.S. and Canada
was the top challenge listed by poll participants. A few named difficulty
predicting returns and liability valuation, discouragement in implementing LDI
strategies and the negative impact on funding status. The second most common
lament was market volatility, making predicting returns and developing funding
strategies more difficult. The third most commonly listed challenge was funding
requirement and cash contributions. As liabilities are artificially
inflated, many organizations are forced to contribute cash to their plans to
meet funding requirements. This impacts financial statements and other
investments, such as work force expansion or new product launches.
The poll was conducted from July to August 2012 and
collected responses from 110 U.S. and Canadian executive overseeing corporate
pension assets ranging from $25 million to over $1 billion. Forty-eight percent
oversee more than $300 million in assets. None of the respondents were institutional
clients of SEI.
The full survey results are available by emailing
seiresearch@seic.com.