Tackling the Industry’s Diversity and Inclusion Problem

Even though African Americans make up about 13% of the United States population, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports this group accounts for only about 7.6% of financial services professionals.

During a far-reaching discussion at the 2019 PLANSPONSOR National Conference in Washington, D.C., Jonathan McBride, managing director and global head of inclusion and diversity at BlackRock, admitted candidly that in a perfect world, his job wouldn’t exist.

“The only reason I can have a title like ‘global head of inclusion and diversity’ is because people still don’t believe that corporations, whether we’re talking about financial services companies or any other sector, can grow to be fully diverse and inclusive on their own,” McBride said. “My title is an acknowledgement that there is a problem with inclusion and diversity that must be tackled head-on.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

The numbers bear this out, McBride said. Right now just 19% of financial advisers in the U.S. are women. When one considers the professional fields that intersect with the financial and retirement advisory space the problem is thrown into sharper relief; fully 52% of accountants are women and 32% of attorneys are women. At the same time, even though African Americans make up about 13% of the United States population, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports this group accounts for only about 7.6% of financial services professionals.

McBride talked about his own background as a mix-raced man working in corporate America, noting that he has been thinking about diversity and cultural inclusion issues throughout his professional life. Notably, McBride worked for the Obama Administration, first serving as Deputy Director of Personnel and then later as the full Director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office.

In recent years, McBride said, the conversation about inclusion and diversity in the corporate office setting has slowly but surely grown to be more pressing and sophisticated. This has occurred for many reasons, he said, including the fact that Millennials—the most diverse generation in U.S. history and also the largest—now make up a sizable and growing portion of the workforce. He contrasted the current diversity discussion with work that was being done by financial services firms in the 90’s and early 2000’s.

“At that time, there was actually some short-lived success bringing people of color and more women into the financial services field,” McBride explained. “However, firms quickly proved to be pretty poor at retaining these people. A big reason why this occurred, and why the industry returned to a bad state from the diversity perspective, is that many firms did very little to make sure people felt like they belonged. They thought getting diverse candidates in the door would be enough.”

In 2019, McBride said, there is more of an understanding that people from different cultural backgrounds can and should have different expectations about the workplace. Importantly, there is a growing understanding that these differences in expectations represent an opportunity for employers rather than a burden.  

“Employers are starting to understand that they can’t just bring in diverse people and pretend everyone is exactly the same,” McBride said. “This is why you will hear more and more about the concept of ‘belonging’ in the workplace. This idea is based in the belief that homogeneity is not a strength, necessarily, and that supporting people with different outlooks and expectations will result in a stronger and more loyal workforce.”

McBride encouraged all employers, even those that are already diverse and inclusive, to think about how they can inspire “emotional ownership” among their employees.  

“The concept of emotional ownership is what sets a truly great company apart from a good company,” McBride said. “The CEOs and executives at great companies have figured out how to get employees to take their jobs personally. They empower people at all levels of the organization to feel like owners.”

On this point, McBride said that an employer’s attitude about paid time off and work-life balance is critically important.

“For some reason, what we are willing to do for our clients doesn’t always match up with what we are willing to do for our own employees,” McBride observed. “Many companies will do whatever it takes to make a loyal customer happy and to be flexible for them, but so many companies don’t give this same flexibly and understanding to their workers. This needs to change.”

Sponsors Seeking Advisers with CIT, ESG Expertise

Many retirement plan participants want to deploy their values in their portfolios, as do portfolio managers; advisers can help make this happen.

The second day of the 2019 PLANSPONSOR National Conference, held last week in Washington, D.C., included a timely, in-depth panel discussion about new investment ideas for defined contribution (DC) retirement plans, with a particular focus on the subjects of environmental, social and governance investing (ESG) and collective investment trusts (CITs)

The expert panel included Todd Kading, president and co-founder of LeafHouse Financial; Cameron Kleinheksel, senior consultant with Plante Moran Wealth Management; Rita Fiumara, senior vice president and institutional retirement consultant at UBS Financial Services; and Brent Sheppard, partner and financial adviser at Cadence Financial Management.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Starting with ESG, Kading explained that the basic subject can be thought of as having two poles. On the one side, ESG can be “values-driven,” meaning that an investor wants to use environmental, social and governance investing approaches in order to express a specific belief or intention—for example addressing climate change or workplace inequality. On the other hand, ESG investing approaches that are “values-based,” in Kadin’s explanation, are embraced by those investors that see ESG as an opportunity for risk reduction and potential long-term outperformance.

Under this nomenclature, given the importance of the fiduciary duty and the need to consider the economics of a particular investment first and foremost, retirement plans that have or will embrace ESG are much more likely to be in the “values-based” camp.

Sheppard and Fiumara emphasized that the conversation about “ESG in DC plans” today is much more sophisticated than it was say, five or 10 years ago. There are many more ESG-labeled products on the shelf today, they explained, and the ESG theme is being programmed into many funds and investment products that do not explicitly carry an ESG label. Additionally, plan sponsors are running analyses of their existing fund menus to rate them from an ESG perspective, and using this type of thinking to help steer decisions about tailoring the investment menu.

“There has been a lot of progress, but the ESG investing landscape is still in its early stages,” Kleinheksel said. “Millennials will drive this trend moving forward. As early as 2025, 75% of the workplace could be made up of Millennials, and they are very plugged into this topic.”

“There is also more diversity in the participant base,” Fiumara observed. “They want to deploy their values in their portfolios, as do portfolio managers. The DOL’s position is still that fiduciaries may not sacrifice performance for any outside agenda. This used to be thought of as a hurdle to ESG, but now there is an understanding that ESG can drive outperformance. Corporations are recognizing their own opportunities having to do with sustainable practices. It’s about reputation, quality control and sustainability.”

Turning to the topic of collective investment trusts, the panel stepped through some of the key differences between CITs and mutual funds. They said the basic differences comes from the fact that CITs don’t have to abide by various reporting and disclosure rules put in place and policed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which leads to potential cost savings. One other point of difference is that providers of CITs have more freedom versus mutual fund providers to create special pricing breaks and discounts for large or long-tenured clients. Advisers serving multiple clients can also help plan sponsors pool their resources to gain access to customizable CIT products.

“One suggested downside is that transparency for CITs isn’t as strong, but that argument makes less sense today, as the industry has evolved and digital reporting technology has become so prevalent,” Kleinheksel said. “Is one better than the other, mutual funds or CITs? It depends a lot on what size of entity you are and what your relationships with advisers and providers look like.”

Sheppard observed that CITs have evolved alongside the race to the bottom that has occurred in the passive mutual fund space.

“The fee reductions we’ve seen in passive mutual funds have, perhaps, undercut some of the appeal of CITs, but we should point out that fee reductions have occurred much more on the passive side, while active fund management fees remain higher,” Sheppard said. “For this reason, more and more asset managers are creating CIT versions of their most popular active mutual funds, so plan sponsors may want to look into that.”

Fiumara concluded that the use of CITs is one area where advisers can help sponsors a lot, especially those with good relationships with the various recordkeepers and asset managers that are influential in the DC space.

“The top recordkeepers often have special selling and service agreements with all the asset managers out there, which, in turn, makes it easy for us as advisers to create custom portfolios,” she explained. “Custom CITs can encompass more complex investment options that you don’t want to offer as standalone funds. There is an opportunity to build a unique fund-of-funds that matches the needs of the participant base, or even to create a CIT with a target-date structure.”

«

 

You’re viewing the third of three free articles.

  This is your final free article. 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.

Close