State Street Global Advisors Survey Finds Increased ETF Use by Advisers

ETFs have a long way to go before they overtake mutual funds in the DC space, but data from State Street Global Advisors suggested they could be on the way to catching up. 

State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) published a new survey showing financial advisers and wealth managers are widely using exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to gain more nimble exposure to individual sectors or industries within client portfolios.

The survey polled more than 400 advisers, finding the strong majority (85%) are using ETFs in this way. More than one-quarter of survey respondents further report that over 20% of their assets under management are allocated to sector/industry ETFs.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

It should be noted that SSGA is a prevalent provider of this type of ETF via its SPDR product line, but the firm says “the lower for longer return environment” has undoubtedly inspired investment professionals to take “a more precise approach to asset allocation.” This favors the nimbleness and lower costs of ETFs over mutual funds, according to SSGA, and it also suggests sector-aware investing is increasingly important over traditional style-based investing,

Advisers’ top reasons for incorporating sector and industry ETFs into client portfolios include portfolio diversification (cited by 66% of respondents); expressing tactical views (65%); obtaining alpha (49%); and managing risk in the equity market (42%).

According to Nick Good, co-head of the global SPDR business at State Street Global Advisors, from 2000 to 2015, the average yearly difference between large cap growth and value was under 8%, while the average difference between the best-and worst-performing sectors was 36%.

“Given this divergence, advisers are increasingly relying on sector and industry strategies to meet the needs of their clients,” he proposes.

Across all types of investment professionals, the use of sector and industry ETFs is most prevalent by private wealth managers, with 92% reporting they had some exposure to the sector and/or industry funds. This is followed by independent and regional broker/dealer advisers (87%), national B/D advisers (86%) and registered investment advisers (80%). The most important variables these investment professionals consider when choosing a specific sector or industry ETF are liquidity, expense ratio and the fund’s holdings.

In terms of forward-looking data, SSGA finds that nearly all (95%) financial advisers polled plan to either increase (45%) or maintain (50%) their use of sector and industry ETFs in the future.

A full copy of the report can be downloaded on SSGA’s website

TIAA Analysis Measures Persistent Gender Gap In Savings

“Women face hurdles during their savings years and then face a second, equally difficult, set of challenges throughout retirement,” a new TIAA report warns. 

A new report from TIAA, “Income Insights: Gender Retirement Gap,” suggests the barriers women face when it comes to planning for retirement are very significant and very long-lasting.

Diane Garnick, managing director and chief income strategist at TIAA, penned the report.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

“We live in an era where gender equality is increasingly becoming the norm, but we also happen to live during a time with ample access to the data and tools necessary to draw more accurate conclusions,” she suggests. “The data enables us to identify the obstacles women face during their savings and retirement phases. The tools enable us to provide the clarity necessary for resolving the problem at hand.”

According to TIAA, the data points speak for themselves: In order for two recent college graduates to have the same amount of money saved for retirement, the average man would need to save 10% of his salary, while the woman would need to save 18%. At the same time, generally speaking, TIAA finds women work for less years and receive fewer salary increases compared with men, among other issues.

“Many retirement strategies assume workers will be in the workforce for 40 years,” the TIAA report says. “The data demonstrates that neither men nor women tend to work that many years. Frequently, women take time off to have children, and then do so again later in life to care for elderly parents. These career breaks add up, resulting in women spending significantly fewer years in the workforce.”

In terms of the real data, men work an average of 38 years, while women average 29 years.

“This nine-year shortfall means that women work 75% of the years that men work,” TIAA observes. “This fact alone makes it immediately obvious that women need to save a higher percentage of their salary while they are working.”

NEXT: Work patterns have shifted 

Interestingly, TIAA finds the number of women opting to leave the workforce to care for their children is on the rise. According to the Pew Research Center, at the turn of the century, 23% of working age women considered themselves to be stay-at-home mothers. Today the number is nearly 30%.

“The largest share are married women with working husbands,” TIAA explains. “This may seem surprising given the increase in educational achievement over that period. In 1970 only 7% of this group were college graduates, compared to 25% today.”

Further complicating the picture is that despite how long women work, the gender pay gap persists. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in the general population, women still only earn 78 cents on the dollar relative to men.

“Women classified as professionals are even worse off,” TIAA warns. “Professional women earned $996 per week in 2015, compared to professional men who earned $1,383. Stated another way, that is 72 cents on the dollar.”

TIAA goes on to observe that women live longer than men, adding yet another challenge in the form of increased spending, especially on health care. Once they reach age 65, women outlive men by 2.5 years with life expectancies of 85.5 and 83, respectively.

“Frequently, women interpret these statistics to mean they will live 2.5 years longer than their spouse, which is not generally the case,” TIAA adds. “This would only be true if the spouses were the same age. In the U.S. today the average age spread between spouses is 2.1 years.”

TIAA concludes that these problems are indeed daunting, but there is real hope of solving them with a fairly simple formula of higher contribution rates; improved employee education about retirement prep; selecting a qualified default investment alternative (QDIA) with higher levels of equity risk; or building a guaranteed lifetime income option within the retirement plan. 

A full copy of the report is available here

«