Reach Out and Touch an Adviser: Repeat

Financial service providers are reaching out to advisers more than ever before, according to a report by Cogent Research.

“We’re seeing that providers are taking a multifaceted approach to adviser communications, including increased interactions with advisers via social media and other newer mediums,” Meredith Rice, senior product director at Cogent, told PLANADVISER. “However, advisers still largely rely on, and expect the same frequency of communication, via emails and wholesaler visits.” Rice is author of the “Advisor Touchpoints 2013” study.

Providers communicate using newer media, such as webinars and social media, the report said, instead of depending solely on email and print mailings. On average, the report found, advisers receive 126 contacts per month from product manufacturers, up from the more than the 110 touches per month reported a year ago and the 103 contacts per month reported five years ago.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANADVISERdash daily newsletter.

“The fact that adviser touches are at a five-year high, yet many providers still lag the optimal frequency, was somewhat surprising,” Rice said. “Providers need to focus on the issues and ideas that matter most to advisers in order to break through the clutter.”

Provider email and external wholesaler visits are generally regarded by advisers as the most effective modes of communication, according to the report, a finding similar to previous years. Preference for specific types of communication varies significantly by the type of communications advisers receive. This year’s report reveals that providers have significantly increased their reach across a variety of other mediums, including print mailings, webinar invitations, internal sales calls and social media. 

According to Rice, advisers prefer different types of communication, depending on the message.  Email is best for updates on performance or product changes. “Visits from wholesalers are ideal for learning about a new product and business building strategies,” she said. “Advisers have come to expect a multifaceted approach from providers. In fact, ETF [exchange-traded fund] providers are targeting advisers most frequently through social media.” These ancillary, often newer, mediums reinforce the overall relationship between adviser and provider.

Since raising the overall volume of touches, financial providers are getting closer to striking the right frequency advisers prefer, the report said, but companies must also ensure their messaging addresses adviser needs. “In terms of content, advisers are looking for thought leadership on investment strategy topics and market updates and commentary,” Rice said.

With thought leadership, providers face the arduous task of not only creating cutting-edge material, but also addressing the subjects that advisers view as timely and informative, Rice said. With so many providers clamoring for attention, there is an immediate need for providers to pinpoint the issues and ideas that matter most to advisers.

The annual Advisor Touchpoints study is based on a survey of more than 1,700 financial advisers in the U.S.

Cogent Research, a division of Market Strategies International, provides custom research, syndicated research products and evidence-based consulting to financial services organizations. More information about the report is on their website.

Indexing in DC Plans Rises Sharply

Research from Vanguard's Center for Retirement Research examines how the adoption of index target-date strategies has transformed the composition of defined contribution (DC) plans.  

Strongly associated with indexing as a core investment philosophy, Vanguard looks at the evolution of indexing within Vanguard-administered DC plans in “Indexing in Defined Contribution Plans 2004-2012.” Although the research is specific to Vanguard, the paper states the firm’s belief that an analysis of the Vanguard experience is a useful benchmark for assessing the relationship of target-date funds (TDFs) and indexing in DC plans over time.

By the end of the eight-year period, nearly half of Vanguard DC plan assets were invested in index funds, and $1 of every $6 was invested in index target-date options. As recently as 2008, the fraction of actively managed assets exceeded the fraction of indexed assets within Vanguard DC plans. By year-end 2012, 45% of Vanguard DC plan assets were invested in indexed or passively managed options, 31% were invested in actively managed options, and the remaining 24% were invested in “non-indexable” assets—money  market, stable value and company stock options.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANADVISER newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan adviser news.

Several trends are reshaping the composition of DC plan assets, according to Vanguard’s paper. As noted in earlier Vanguard research, the growth of TDFs is transforming participant investment allocations, whether through default or voluntary choice mechanisms.  (See “More Participants Seeking Managed Investments.”)

At the same time, sponsor scrutiny of recordkeeping and investment fees in DC plans has spiked. Sponsors have been considering how to use passive investment strategies to reduce investment costs, as well as reduce active management risk exposure and improve diversification.

Menu composition has changed during the eight years Vanguard examined. The average number of options offered increased, from 18 to 27, because of the addition of index target-date options to plan menus. Plan sponsors adding index target-date options to plan menus replaced actively managed funds. With the introduction of index TDFs within Vanguard-administered DC plans, the fraction of indexed assets has increased sharply.

TDFs Transform DC Menus

This change underscores the fact that the composition of DC plan menus is being changed by the rapid adoption of target-date strategies. Moreover, the choice of active versus passive TDFs is driving changes in the composition of a DC plan’s active/passive mix and its investment cost structure. Sponsors seeking to lower aggregate plan costs and reduce participants’ active risk exposure should consider choosing a passive target-date series. Sponsors choosing active target-date strategies should weigh the long- term effect of that decision on aggregate plan investment costs and aggregate active risk exposure among participants.

Passive TDFs were introduced on Vanguard’s recordkeeping system in late 2003. As a result, the absolute level of indexing among clients choosing Vanguard as a recordkeeper is higher than industry averages. For example, in 2011, an estimated 20% of all assets within DC plans were passively managed, compared with 41% of all DC plan assets at Vanguard.  

Since the study evaluates aggregate plan allocations at the end of each calendar year, the sample gives a snapshot of plans over time. The year-end 2012 sample included approximately 2,000 DC plans covering nearly 3.4 million participants, including both active and deferred participants.  The study begins with an analysis of the allocation of plan assets among active and index investment choices, and how this allocation has changed over time. Vanguard considers the changing composition of DC plan menus and highlights the strong relationship between menu lineups and plan asset allocation.

“Indexing in Defined Contribution Plans 2004-2012” can be downloaded here.

«